Policy, Law, Economics and Politics - Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
This privately-owned website is operated and maintained by Creamer Media
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
25 May 2012
   
 
 
Article by: Creamer Media Reporter

Nando’s strikes again - with a controversial TV ad campaign, leaving the South African community in stitches and Zimbabweans with a sour taste.

The new ad titled, The Last Dictator Standing, shows Mugabe alone at a dinner table reminiscing about the good times he had with his co-dictators who have passed on. It has only been a week since Nando’s launched the commercial on South African TV, but the ad has gone viral with over 258 000 views and Robert Mugabe’s youth supporters have already called upon all Zimbabweans to boycott Nando’s restaurants in their country as the ad undermines the President’s authority, which is a criminal offence in Zimbabwe. However, Mugabe and his officials have not laid a complaint regarding the ad.

According to Adams & Adams’ Trade mark Attorney and Advertising Law expert, Kelly Thompson, the commercial could possibly run into problems in South Africa too if a complaint were to be lodged. The ASA code says that advertisers should not portray living persons without their permission. However, there are a few exceptions to the rule, like occasions where the ASA does not believe the portrayal is inconsistent with the individual’s right to reasonable degree of privacy and does not believe that there has been an unjustifiable commercial exploitation of the individual’s fame or reputation.

Nando’s has been in hot water before with the ASA over a reference to the then CEO of South African Airways in an ad after substantial media coverage alleged that his wife had obtained a tender through her relationship to him. There, Nando’s argued that public figures have a lesser right to privacy. The ASA agreed because the facts surrounding the allegations had been widely broadcast and dismissed the complaint. Likewise, with the present ad, it is arguable that Robert Mugabe’s mis-deeds and the fact that he is a dictator have been so widely publicised that his right to privacy has been substantially diminished and this ad is not inconsistent with that right.

For more information contact:
Adams & Adams
Kelly Thompson – telephone 012 432 6000
Or on behalf of Adams & Adams
Megan Larter – telephone 083 605 8859

 

Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter
 
 
 
 
  Photos
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Map
 
 
 
 
 
 
Advertisements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Related social media
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Topics on this page
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Online Publishers Association