Read the full judgment on Saflii 

The reasons for her order are multifarious and extensive; they range from questions around the likelihood of irreparable harm should the relief not be granted, to questions of self-created urgency.  While I am in no way bound by the order of Crutchfield J, and still less by the reasons for which she decided not to enrol the matter, and while I am required to consider afresh the question as to whether this matter should be entertained in the urgent court today,  I should indicate that I consider the reasoning of my learned sister in relation to the question of self-created urgency to be compelling.

I debated the circumstances under which those reasons might no longer be applicable at length with Mr Moela, who appeared together with Mr Rammai for the applicant. The applicant seeks to rely on what Mr Moela characterises as “new facts” that have emerged since the time of Her Ladyship’s judgment.