We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
close notification
Date
: 18/10/2005
Source:Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism
Title: van Schalkwyk: National Consultative Conference on Climate
Change
Opening speech by Marthinus Van Schalkwyk, Minister
of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, at the National Consultative
Conference on Climate Change in Gauteng
NATIONAL CONSULTATIVE CONFERENCE: A NEW APPROACH TO CLIMATE
CHANGE
Introduction
Five years ago, at the start of the new Millennium, a small baby
girl named Rositha Chirindza was born in Mozambique. What made her
birth unusual was the fact that, at the moment of her delivery, her
mother Cecilia was sheltering on a flimsy platform, built hastily
in a tree. One month ago, six-year old Ariel Valteau was reunited
with her family, a week after she had been separated from them in
the American city of New Orleans. One week ago rescue workers in
the village of Santa Tecla were still searching for the bodies of
10-year old Alejando Gonzalez and his four-year old sister
Francisca – believed to have been killed in one of more than
200 deadly mudslides to hit El Salvador.
Apart from their innocence and their youth we should be asking what
it is that these four children have in common. What golden thread
binds together four young people so widely separated by language,
geography, and nationality? The answer is as simple as it is
frightening – weather events so extreme that they have shaken
the foundations of our global society. Rositha and her family came
to represent the more than 2 million Mozambicans who lost their
homes and livelihoods in the devastation of the floods in 2000.
Ariel was one of more than 2500 children reported missing in the
aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Alejando and Francisca are amongst
the estimated 1200 deaths caused by Hurricane Stan in El Salvador,
Mexico, Costa Rica, Nicaragua and Honduras.
If there is one global truth rapidly emerging from the chaos of our
changing weather patterns, it is that no nation, no community and
no person can rest assured of their security.
Conference Aims to Produce SA National Action Plan
In the light of such directly observable changes and the
overwhelming weight of scientific evidence which is being presented
and reviewed at our parallel Science Conference, this National
Consultative Conference takes on added significance. Our
discussions about the most appropriate response by South Africa to
global climate change are less and less about abstract concepts,
and more and more about the lives and future welfare of our
people.
This is why our department is co-ordinating the efforts across all
departments to draft, consult and guide through Cabinet our
National Climate Change Response Strategy. It is our hope that the
outcome of this conference will lay the foundation for the
development of concrete National Action Plans, to translate this
strategy into mainstream government policy, daily action in the
private sector, and positive changes in daily household
routines.
Most vulnerable nations least able to afford climate change
impacts
One of the staggering facts about the recent devastation of
Hurricane Katrina in the United States is the estimated cost of the
recovery and rebuilding efforts. The conservative estimate is that
America will spend more than $200 billion. For perspective, compare
this with the situation of the South Pacific Island nation of
Tuvalu, which averages an altitude of only one meter above sea
level. The leaders of Tuvalu have estimated that, should sea levels
continue to rise at current rates due to global warming, their
country will be largely underwater within 50 years. In spite of the
fact that Tuvalu is one of the nations of the world most at-risk
from climate change – it is also amongst the least able to
adapt or prepare for it – with a total Gross Domestic Product
of less than $13 million – about 17 000 times less than the
costs to America of Katrina’s devastation.
This example is instructive because it brings home the point that
the nations most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change
– and South Africa is one of them – are also the ones
least able to afford the added risks. The least developed countries
– especially in Africa - and the Small Island Developing
States cannot bear the brunt of these costs. What is needed, as a
next step, in addition to the other policies and measures under
discussion within the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change (UNFCCC) and under the Kyoto Protocol, is global
commitment and mechanisms to provide new and additional finance,
capacity and technology, sourced primarily from developed
countries, to assist affected countries and populations to cope
with the consequences of climate change.
A new approach to climate change for the developing world
The first meeting of the parties to the Kyoto Protocol, following
its coming into force, will be held in Montreal in November this
year. The meeting will also mark the opening of talks about
post-2012 commitments for the developed countries bound by Kyoto.
It is important for developing countries like India, China, Brazil
and South Africa to acknowledge that we have a duty to do more to
address climate change. We must use this conference to reflect on
what kind of policies and measures are practical, affordable and
consistent with our development path.
We fully support the fundamental premise of the UNFCCC - that all
countries must take responsibility. In doing so we emphasise the
agreement that developed countries, who bear most responsibility
for causing climate change and who have the resources, must take
the lead in implementing solutions. We believe that our own
commitments may take a different form to those of developed
nations. Our message is that we stand ready to do more to
de-carbonise our development, but that we will expect, from
developed countries, a commitment to take the lead on deeper
emission reductions, new and additional financial support, improved
technology transfer and capacity building. I want also to emphasise
that when we engage on climate change at the international level,
we will work to shift the current bias from a focus primarily on
mitigation, to one which gives substantial content and resources to
adaptation measures.
While we stand ready to do more, our national circumstances must be
acknowledged. Any future commitments for developing countries must
be consistent with their capabilities, their sustainable
development objectives, and take into account the current structure
of their economies. Such commitments must ultimately map out a
proactive, sustainable and equitable growth path which meets our
objectives to eradicate poverty while at the same addressing
climate change. To assist South Africa in preparing for such
commitments, Cabinet has approved a process of scenario-planning
which will, within the next year, formulate and examine future
scenarios to proactively shape our longer term domestic policy and
capacity-building.
Multi-lateralism, partnerships and law hold key to reducing
emissions
Our government has made a choice – to be guided by the
overwhelming weight of scientific evidence that indicates climate
change is intensifying and that human activity is contributing to
the problem. Rather than engaging in futile academic debate with
fringe scientists and climate sceptics, it is our responsibility to
focus instead on how best to react. We must mitigate against
climate change and adapt our economies to enable communities to
face the reality of changing weather patterns.
In terms of the international response, our first choice is clearly
the multi-lateral approach – but we recognise that
partnerships can also add value – as long as they don’t
undermine that approach. We must work to build a more inclusive
international regime that addresses a broad spectrum of concrete
global actions in addition to the Kyoto mechanisms which will also
bring major developed country emitters like the United States and
Australia on board.
In our efforts to address climate change from within South Africa
– limited as our total contribution to global emissions may
be - our first choice as government will always be to work with
communities and business in a co-operative partnership, especially
in implementing our multilateral obligations. The agreement signed
yesterday with Business Unity South Africa (BUSA), to bring about
voluntary Greenhouse Gas emission reporting as part of a national
inventory, is a powerful example of such cooperation.
One of the aims of this conference is to focus government and our
private sector to do more. In the area of electricity generation,
for instance, ESKOM announced at the World Summit on Sustainable
Development (WSSD) the aspiration to reduce the percentage of coal
in our energy mix by 10% by 2012 – an ambitious but critical
goal. The challenge is to shift even more significantly from our
current levels of 92% coal dependence for electricity. Whilst
significant shifts in this direction will require major domestic
and international commitment and investment to achieve, it is
precisely this kind of aspiration that we should be discussing in
our deliberations.
Partnership and voluntary action alone may not be sufficient
however. We must also open the dialogue about how best to use
existing legislation in support of our climate change responses.
The new Air Quality Act for instance provides a number of tools
that have been designed to assist us in improving the atmospheric
health of our nation. Options such as the designation of controlled
emitters, controlled fuels and priority pollutants must be examined
in the climate change context if we are to give the force of law to
our Climate Change Response Strategy.
Conclusion
I would like to take this opportunity to thank every person,
organisation and institution that has made this ground-breaking
event possible – especially my Cabinet colleagues who have
served with us on the Inter-Ministerial Committee responsible for
this event.
It is now my distinct privilege to introduce our keynote speaker,
which provides me with the opportunity to pay tribute to her
leadership during her tenure as Minister of Minerals and Energy. It
was she who led the charge by finalising our White Paper on
Renewable Energy. It was she who signed off on our national energy
efficiency strategy; set cleaner fuel specifications; and guided
our Designated National Authority for carbon trading through
Cabinet. Her elevation to the position of Deputy President in June
has catapulted our energy and climate change priorities to the
highest echelons of government leadership. It gives me great
pleasure to ask you to join me in welcoming our Honourable Deputy
President, Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, to deliver the keynote address
of this conference.
Issued by: Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism
18 October 2005