Policy, Law, Economics and Politics - Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
This privately-owned website is operated and maintained by Creamer Media
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
26 May 2012
   
 
 
Article by: Sapa

The Supreme Court of Appeal has found that trade unions can be held liable for damage caused by workers during strikes.

In the judgment on Tuesday, which upheld an earlier ruling by the Western Cape High Court, Justice Mahomed Navsa wrote that the country "could not be subjected to the tyranny of the mob".

"In the past the majority of the population was subjected to the tyranny of the state," the Cape Times newspaper quoted Navsa as saying.

"We cannot now be subjected to the tyranny of the mob."

The High Court ruling favoured eight people, including traders whose stalls were looted and smashed and motorists whose vehicles were wrecked, during a South African Transport and Allied Workers Union protest in the Cape Town city centre in May 2006.

The group is claiming R70 000 in damages.

Advocate Anton Katz, who took on the case pro bono with advocate Darryl Cooke and attorney Amanda Torr, welcomed the ruling, saying it would have "major implications" for other incidents where people's property had been damaged as a result of organised protests.

The matter was initially head by Western Cape Judge President John Hlophe who ruled in favour of the eight applicants.

Edited by: Sapa
 
 
Readers Comments
 
 
  Photos
 
 
 

																															(Picture by: Duane Daws)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Advertisements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Related social media
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Topics on this page
 
 
 
Industry Term
 
Person
 
Published Medium
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Online Publishers Association