Universal succession of all plaintiff's rights and obligations under Japanese law after litis contestation - substantive application to substitute successor as the
plaintiff successful - validity of Rule 15 notice consequently not considered - s 15(2) of Prescription Act 68 of 1969 not set in motion by substitution.
On appeal from: Johannesburg High Court (Antrobus AJ sitting as court of
The appeal is dismissed with costs, including the costs occasioned by the employment of two counsel.
Tecmed v Nissho Iwai Corporation0.13 MB