Policy, Law, Economics and Politics - Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
This privately-owned website is operated and maintained by Creamer Media
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
26 May 2012
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
DOWNLOAD
Tarfix (Pty) Ltd v MEC, Department of Public Works and Rural Development, Free State Province and Another (3452/2010) [2012] ZAFSHC 7 - 68 KB
 

The plaintiff is claiming provisional sentence relying on an agreement between the parties. The relevant aspect is the “payment certificate” by an engineer alleged to be the agent of the defendants. This aspect is denied by the defendants. The other defence raised by the defendants is that there is a counterclaim for damages as a result of breach of the provisions material to the agreement by the plaintiff.

Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter
 
 
 
 
  Photos
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Advertisements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Online Publishers Association