Policy, Law, Economics and Politics - Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
This privately-owned website is operated and maintained by Creamer Media
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
20 May 2013
   
 
 
 
DOWNLOAD
 

During the first year of my tenure (starting in September 2008), I had the privilege to meet a significant number of States‘ representatives and with all United Nations human rights treaty bodies. Many States expressed frustration in dealing appropriately with the multiple reporting obligations to which they had committed. In addition to reporting under the international human rights treaties these include for example reporting obligations under the Universal Periodic Review process (UPR) and several ILO conventions. Nearly all treaty bodies expressed deep dissatisfaction at the number of obstacles that limit their capacity to properly discharge their mandate, including lack of meeting time to review the growing number of States parties‘ reports and individual communications and the resulting backlog in their consideration, lack of timely translation of documents and the insufficient number of OHCHR staff supporting their work.

Report by Navi Pillay, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights

Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter
 
 
 
 
  Photos
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Advertisements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Topics on this page
 
 
 
Company
 
Industry Term
 
Person
 
Published Medium
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Online Publishers Association