Policy, Law, Economics and Politics - Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
This privately-owned website is operated and maintained by Creamer Media
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
26 May 2012
   
 
 

Mr Malema's suspension should not surprise anyone. Nobody in any organisation can alienate so many powerful factions so abrasively for so long without paying a price.

Whatever Malema's future may be the issues that he so aggressively articulates and the constituency that he claims to represent will not disappear.

One of the central challenges facing government - and indeed all South Africans - will be to restore some degree of hope to the millions of young - predominantly black - South Africans, whom Malema claims to represent. Our new society has failed them dismally: it has left most of them educationally crippled and 70% are unemployed.

All this makes them susceptible to the populist promises of demagogues. The nostrums that Malema prescribes are politically and economically illiterate but enormously appealing to these millions of young people subsisting on their siblings' children's allowances and their grannies' pensions.

The message is also fundamentally racist: "Look at the whites, the way they live. They stole all this from us and we must take it back. We must take back the land; we must take the companies on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange; we must nationalize the mines - all without compensation."

Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of Malema's demise was the fact that he was not found guilty of sewing racial dissension. The charge arose from his statement at a rally in Galishewe earlier this year when he had said, in President Zuma' presence, that whites are criminals who stole our land; that they should be treated as criminals and that their land should be seized without compensation.

He was cleared of the charge of fomenting racism, arising from this statement, because it was not proved on " balance of probabilities".

One wonders what aspect of Malema's Galishewe statement was ambiguous and what probabilities led the ANC's NDC to conclude that this was not blatant racism? What was the NDC saying about the ANC' commitment to non-racialism and what message was it sending to white South Africans?

Dave Steward: Executive Director

Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter
 
 
 
 
  Photos
 
 
 
SA former president FW De Klerk
 
SA former president FW De Klerk
 
 
 
 
 
Advertisements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Related social media
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Topics on this page
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Online Publishers Association