Policy, Law, Economics and Politics - Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
This privately-owned website is operated and maintained by Creamer Media
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
25 May 2012
   
 
 
 
DOWNLOAD
 

The appellants are participants in the unpolished diamond industry, some with dealers’ licences and one with a diamond exchange certificate, who approached the Pretoria High Court for an interim interdict. Their application was born out of the changes to the Diamonds Act, which came into effect on 1 July 2008. The South African Diamond Producers Organisation, of whom they are all members, launched an application to have the alleged offending provisions declared unconstitutional, and whilst that application is pending, they sought interim relief to preserve their business operations which developed in terms of the un-amended legislation. Their interim application failed in the Pretoria High Court and on appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal, their appeal was dismissed.

The Supreme Court of Appeal decided that the appellants failed to show that the tender and export businesses that they were conducting with unlicensed foreigners were legitimate in terms of the un-amended Act. In addition it found that the amending provisions that came into operation on 1 July 2008 merely sought to root out illegal trade in unpolished diamonds in express terms.
 

Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter
 
 
 
 
  Photos
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Advertisements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Related social media
 
Related social media terms:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Topics on this page
 
 
 
Facility
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Online Publishers Association