https://www.polity.org.za
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Statements RSS ← Back
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Article Enquiry

SA: Justice Portfolio Committee unhappy about lack of report on impact of court judgements

Close

Embed Video

SA: Justice Portfolio Committee unhappy about lack of report on impact of court judgements

SA: Justice Portfolio Committee unhappy about lack of report on impact of court judgements

14th March 2017

ARTICLE ENQUIRY      SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

/ MEDIA STATEMENT / The content on this page is not written by Polity.org.za, but is supplied by third parties. This content does not constitute news reporting by Polity.org.za.

The Portfolio Committee on Justice and Correctional Services today expressed concern regarding the non-availability of the final report on the impact of court judgements on socio-economic conditions.

Committee Chairperson Dr Mathole Motshekga emphasised: “It must be made clear that we (the Committee) want the original report and not a sanitised version.”

Dr Motshekga said the absence of the report makes it difficult for the Committee, as it lacks empirical evidence. He said the Committee noted that the completed report by Fort Hare University and the Human Sciences Research Council was sent to the Department, which then presented it to Cabinet.

According to a presentation by the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, the report was commissioned by Cabinet with the Department as the implementing agent.

Dr Motshekga further said the absence of the complete report presents a problem for the Committee, as it was made available to other government departments and municipalities. “We are now having an uninformed discussion and without the report we are disempowered.”

Advertisement

He made it clear that today’s meeting was not about the independence of the judiciary or the transformation of the judiciary.

During the meeting, the Committee heard that the report focused on the impact of judicial decisions and the extent to which these decisions have been implemented by government.

Advertisement

The Committee heard that the State operates on year budgets within a three year Mid-Term Budget Framework. This means that there may be insufficient funds to implement additional projects, as funds have already been allocated and budgeted for. Further reasons for non- or slow implementation include a skills shortage among government officials and a lack of material and financial resources.

Dr Motshekga also clarified that the initial report should also be presented to the Committee.

 

Issued by Parliamentary Communication Services on behalf of the Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Justice and Correctional Services, Dr Mathole Motshekga

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE ARTICLE ENQUIRY

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

 

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options
Free daily email newsletter Register Now