https://www.polity.org.za
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Case Law / All Case Law RSS ← Back
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Embed Video

S v Thunzi and Another (CCT 81/09) [2010] ZACC 27

6th December 2010

SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

  • S v Thunzi and Another (CCT 81/09) [2010] ZACC 27
    Download
    0.10 MB
Sponsored by

On December 2, 2010, the Constitutional Court delivered a judgment regarding the parallel legislation governing the use of dangerous weapons in the territories of the former Transkei, Bophuthatswana, Venda and Ciskei (TBVC) states.


This matter is a follow-up to Thunzi (I) where in the course of considering the matter, it appeared that there was a substantial issue as to whether there was a constitutional obligation on Parliament to establish uniform legislation on the use of dangerous weapons in the former TBVC states. Skweyiya J found that the matter called into question the constitutionality of the existence of the multiple Dangerous Weapons Acts that continued to operate in South Africa and the former TBVC states. The Court then issued directions setting the matter down for further hearing on the issue.

Advertisement


In the papers filed before the Constitutional Court it became clear that the applicants, the Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development, the Speaker of the National Assembly and the Chairperson of the National Council of Provinces (Parliament) all agreed that Parliament has an obligation to rationalise the multiple legislation. Parliament further indicated that the process of rationalisation had begun and that the necessary legislation would be introduced in Parliament’s legislative programme for 2011. All notices triggering the operation of the offending provisions in the different pieces of legislation had already been withdrawn. The factual situation is thus that parallel legislation exists regulating the use of dangerous weapons in the former homelands, but none of the provisions are operational.


Froneman J, writing on behalf of the Court noted Parliament’s undertaking to rationalise the legislation in the 2011 legislative session. He found that in these circumstances it was not in the interests of justice to consider whether there was a constitutional obligation to rationalise the parallel legislation governing the use of dangerous weapons in the former TBVC states.

Advertisement


The matter has been postponed to Tuesday 29 November 2011, in order to allow parliament to rationalise the legislation as undertaken.
 

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE      FEEDBACK

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here


About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options

Email Registration Success

Thank you, you have successfully subscribed to one or more of Creamer Media’s email newsletters. You should start receiving the email newsletters in due course.

Our email newsletters may land in your junk or spam folder. To prevent this, kindly add newsletters@creamermedia.co.za to your address book or safe sender list. If you experience any issues with the receipt of our email newsletters, please email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za