https://www.polity.org.za
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / News / South African News RSS ← Back
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Embed Video

Radebe unaware of Simelane’s plans

22nd April 2010

By: Sapa

SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Jeff Radebe claimed on Wednesday that he was left in the dark on new national prosecutions chief Menzi Simelane's controversial plans to restructure the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA).

 

Advertisement

"I have not been briefed. That is why I have requested a briefing with the National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) so that I can understand the issues," he said, briefing Parliament's Portfolio Committee on Justice on his department's budget.

 

Advertisement

He announced that he would bring the long-awaited Superior Courts Bill to Cabinet next week, but the meeting was dominated by concerns over Simelane's plans, notably its perceived interference with the lauded Asset Forfeiture Unit (AFU).

 

"I was not consulted on it. He is the head of the NPA in South Africa and he may have taken a decision that is in the best interest of the NPA but ... I'm unaware of a formal discussion on those matters," he added.

 

The five-year strategic plan unveiled by Simelane last week included making the AFU and three other specialised units answer directly to provincial directors of prosecution, who, in turn, report to him.

 

The opposition Democratic Alliance (DA) protested that this amounts to "disbanding the AFU" and that the plan would be the "ruination" of the NPA because it undermines its independence and places its administration under the director-general of justice.


Radebe was adamant that the future of the AFU was secure, adding: "I haven't seen any motivation from anybody that we should disband the Asset Forfeiture Unit".

 

But he said that he supported an ultimatum given to Willie Hofmeyr by Simelane to choose between his twin posts as head of both the AFU and the Special Investigations Unit (SIU). He has been with the AFU since its inception in 1999 and joined the SIU two years later.


"Of that one I know. The work in the AFU demands that a person be dedicated to that unit."


Hofmeyr did not want to comment on the issue. He did however react to a clause in the NPA strategic plan demanding the return of all AFU investigators that have been seconded to the SIU.

 

Hofmeyr said that some 48 former members of the now defunct Scorpions were placed at the SIU but that since then about 30 had been offered positions at the AFU, enabling them to remain within the NPA.


The move would "not really" weaken the SIU as many had not started work there yet, he added.

 

Radebe said that he had not been aware of this either.


Concern over the future of the special units attached to prosecuting authorities grew this week when the NPA said that it could no longer tolerate a situation where asset forfeiture investigators reported directly to Hofmeyr.

 

Spokesperson Bulelwa Makeke said that it had caused a "disconnect" in that provincial directors of public prosecution were unaware of asset seizure case in their areas.


In future, AFU members would report directly to regional prosecuting authorities while the head of the unit, as well as those of the specialised commercial crime unit, the priority crimes litigation unit and the sexual offences unit, would serve as special advisors to Simelane.

 

Commentators have accused Simelane of trying to weaken the forfeiture unit with its success rate of some 85% and a history of going after high-profile suspects.

 

He raised eyebrows last month when he ordered the AFU not to pursue attempts to freeze the foreign assets of businessman and arms deal corruption suspect, Fana Hlongwane.


DA justice spokesperson Dene Smuts told reporters: "The fact is that the wrong man was appointed as attorney-general.

 

"It is our responsibility to stop this in its tracks - the whole strategic plan and the voting of R2,5-billion for Advocate Simelane to do what I consider to be the ruination of the NPA. "

 

Smuts said that she would not vote in favour of Simelane's budget and repeated an opposition demand that the Constitution be changed to remove a clause stipulating that the justice minister "must exercise final authority" over the NPA.


Smuts said that the issue must be resolved because it would be catastrophic for "the prosecution to become politically partisan" just as effect was being given to the constitutional provision that the courts be independent.

 

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE      FEEDBACK

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here


About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options

Email Registration Success

Thank you, you have successfully subscribed to one or more of Creamer Media’s email newsletters. You should start receiving the email newsletters in due course.

Our email newsletters may land in your junk or spam folder. To prevent this, kindly add newsletters@creamermedia.co.za to your address book or safe sender list. If you experience any issues with the receipt of our email newsletters, please email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za