We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
close notification
Date
: 25/03/2003
Source: South African Reserve Bank (SARB)
Title: Plenderleith: Operation of Monetary Policy
THE AIM AND OPERATION OF MONETARY POLICY, SPEECH BY MR IAN
PLENDERLEITH, DEPUTY GOVERNOR OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN RESERVE BANK, 25
March 2003
I was honoured and delighted to have the opportunity to join the
South African Reserve Bank as a Deputy Governor at the start of
this year. As still very much a newcomer to the South African
scene, I thought I might take this opportunity to share of few of
my early impressions of the South African economy - and
specifically of the operation of monetary policy, which is the
particular responsibility of the Reserve Bank.
I should say at the outset that these impressions are very
positive. There is, in my view, a great deal to be admired in the
performance of the economy, and in the contribution monetary policy
is making to promoting that performance; and in parallel, a great
deal of progress is being made in pressing ahead with structural
reform, across a wide front, in order to ensure that the economy
can fulfil its potential in the future.
Perhaps the most remarkable achievement that strikes me in the
economic sphere is that the South African economy has continued to
achieve steady and sustained growth over the past few years despite
the global economic slowdown in the surrounding world economy. As
the world economy has moved into slowdown over the past two years
or so, the South African economy has continued to grow at around 3%
- not, to be sure, as fast as one would hope to achieve in a more
favourable world environment, but nonetheless a great deal better
than many other economies have experienced. The current cyclical
upswing in the South African economy, which began in September
1999, has now been in progress for 31/2 years; and, looking ahead,
the prospects are encouraging for the economy to continue to
grow.
How has this been achieved? There are no doubt many contributory
factors, but I think an important one is the coherent and
responsible macroeconomic policy framework which the authorities
have steadily and consistently pursued over recent years, covering
both fiscal and monetary policy.
The fiscal side is not for me, as a central banker, to dwell on.
But there is no doubt that the steady commitment the government has
shown to keeping the budget deficit to low and manageable levels
and to containing the burden of public sector debt has delivered
real benefits in terms of a strong and sustainable structure in the
public finances. The result, as evident in the Budget last month,
is that, as the economy has grown and as revenue collection has
strengthened, there has been enhanced scope both to reduce taxes
and to continue building up essential spending programmes on a
sustainable basis.
In the monetary field, on which I want to say a little more, there
has similarly been a commitment to a coherent and responsible
framework steadily and consistently pursued. This is the
inflation-targeting framework, which mandates the Reserve Bank to
keep inflation low in order to deliver broad price stability across
the economy as a whole.
South Africa is, of course, not alone in setting price stability as
the priority for monetary policy. Maintenance of low inflation is
the universal aim that central banks around the world are set to
pursue. But in pursuing this aim within the framework of an
explicit low inflation target, South Africa is very much in the
forefront of international best practice.
Why this emphasis on low inflation and the commitment to price
stability? At one level, the socio-economic damage that flows from
a failure to control inflation is all too evident. High and
volatile rates of inflation disadvantage the poor, who are least
able to protect themselves from the ravages of inflation, to the
benefit of those more able to preserve their standards of living.
Inflation disadvantages in particular those living on fixed
incomes, often the elderly reliant on pensions or savings. Across
the board, inflation will tend to discourage savings and undermine
the ability of people to plan their future personal finances on a
prudent, long-term basis. By eroding values in a corrosive and
insidious fashion, inflation can undermine sociably responsible
behaviour and threaten the stability of society as a whole. Not for
nothing has inflation been called a silent and invisible
thief.
In more specifically economic terms, too, inflation is the enemy of
long-term sustainable economic growth, weakening the capacity of
the economy to achieve the rate of growth of which it is capable.
Past history, in South Africa and in many other countries,
illustrates this all too vividly. If demand in the economy is
allowed to grow faster than the output supply capacity of the
economy, the result is inevitably rising inflation. This is because
excess demand cannot induce the economy to deliver more output than
it is capable of producing: it simply bids up the price of the
output the economy can produce, generating inflation. If inflation
is allowed to gather pace, the process of reining back excess
demand, through higher interest rates, is inevitably more wasteful,
in terms of an extended period of growth below capacity, than if
timely action is taken by the monetary authorities to keep the pace
of demand in line with the supply capacity of the economy. To try
to maintain that balance, between demand and supply in the economy,
is essentially the task of monetary policy and the aim the central
bank is pursuing when it sets interest rates. If it succeeds,
inflation will be kept low and the economy can continue to grow at
a steady and sustainable rate on a continuing and lasting
basis.
There is an important corollary of this process. This is that there
is not, in any meaningful sense, a trade-off between growth and low
inflation. It is not in practice feasible to contemplate living
with a somewhat higher rate of inflation, even for a period, in the
hope that this would bring higher growth. The reason is that low
inflation is not an alternative to growth, but a necessary and
essential pre-condition. Without a commitment - made and delivered
- to keeping inflation low, we will not achieve on a sustainable
basis the growth of which the economy is capable. With low
inflation, demand, and hence output, in the economy can continue to
grow on a steady and sustainable basis. In pursuing low inflation,
therefore, the central bank is aiming for exactly the same goals
that we all desire - continuing sustainable growth in output and
employment and living standards across the economy as a
whole.
The inflation-targeting framework in South Africa has a critical
role to play in maintaining low inflation. Its strength lies in the
fact that its structure contains what I believe to be the four key
elements for an effective monetary framework. Let me say a word
briefly about each.
First, the framework provides for an explicit target to be set for
inflation. This is currently that inflation, as measured by the
CPIX, should be brought back down to, and held within, a range of
3-6%. The value of setting an explicit target in this form is that
it helps to anchor inflation expectations to a low level. Business
and industry, and individuals, in making their own financial plans,
will hopefully do so on the basis that inflation will be kept in
that range over time; and on the basis that, if, as at present,
inflation moves outside that range, the policy stance will be
adjusted promptly to bring it back within range - as indeed was
done last year. Anchoring expectations in this way helps in turn to
build low inflation into the fabric of the economy as a whole. The
target also, importantly, provides a means, quite properly, of
holding the central bank to account for its performance. I shall
touch on this last aspect again in a moment.
Secondly, the inflation-targeting framework gives the
responsibility for achieving the target to the central bank, and
specifically to the Reserve Bank's Monetary Policy Committee,
acting independently and under a clear mandate to deliver the
target. It also gives the MPC the means to achieve the target,
through its decision on setting the Reserve Bank's repo rate at
each of its meetings. The framework thus ensures that there is a
clear allocation of responsibility; and it ensures that interest
rate decisions are taken by a competent authority dedicated to the
task and acting independently.
Thirdly and fourthly, the inflation-targeting framework is one that
delivers a high degree of transparency and accountability.
Transparency and accountability is achieved through the full
statement the MPC issues immediately after each meeting, through
the range of publications the Reserve Bank issues setting out its
view of developments, and through the public appearances the
Governor and his colleagues make in explaining the Reserve Bank's
policy activities. I think this is a very important and beneficial
part of the process for several reasons - partly because it is
right that in a democratic system public agencies should be
required to be open and accountable in explaining their activities;
partly because that process hopefully helps to maintain public
confidence in the performance of the agency and public support for
the objective of low inflation; partly because that in turn should
encourage business and individuals to conduct their affairs on the
basis that low inflation will be maintained; and partly because
openness and accountability helps promote a better public debate on
the issues. These are all elements that I believe help to
strengthen the effectiveness of the inflation-targeting
process.
This framework has, of course, been tested in the past 18 months by
the inflationary shocks the economy has faced from the fall in the
value of the rand in the latter half of 2001 and the accompanying
upwards pressure on food prices and fuel costs. The steps taken
last year to raise interest rates were necessary to prevent these
shocks generating a self-reinforcing process of rising inflation.
As indicated in the statement issued after last week's meeting of
the MPC, there are now signs that the inflationary pressures are
beginning to abate and that the outlook for inflation is improving,
though there is little room for complacency given the considerable
risks we still face.
But to return to my initial impressions, what is particularly
encouraging, I believe, is that the coherent and responsible policy
framework provided by inflation-targeting has demonstrated its
ability to address the shocks in a steady and considered manner
and, in doing so, has helped considerably to maintain confidence in
the economy. This is particularly evident in the international
markets, where confidence in the fundamentals of the South African
economy has undoubtedly been a factor in the recovery of the rand;
and it is evident, too, in the positive attitude to South Africa
encountered more generally abroad - notably, for example, in the
upgrades that have already been put in place by the rating
agencies, with further upgrades in prospect. This, more than
anything, - a well-structured policy framework, steadily and
consistently pursued - is what has helped the South African economy
to continue to grow through the current world slowdown. This is
strong evidence that a commitment to low inflation works, in
helping to maintain sustainable growth, and that it will help us to
achieve the future growth that is essential to enable all of us to
develop the huge potential of this fine country.
Issued by South African Reserve Bank (SARB)
25 March 2003
Source: (http:///www.reservebank.co.za)