We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
close notification
Date
: 09/09/2004
Source: Ministry of Education
Title: N Pandor: Inaugural Nyerere Lecture
INAUGURAL NYERERE LECTURE ON LIFELONG LEARNING BY THE MINISTER OF
EDUCATION, NALEDI PANDOR, MP, University of the Western Cape, Cape
Town, 9 September 2004
Rector and Vice-Chancellor, Mr Brian O' Connell
Distinguished guests
Ladies and gentlemen
Former President of Zambia, Kenneth Kaunda, tells the following
story about former President of Tanzania, Mwalimu Julius Nyerere.
In 1998, a year before his death, Mwalimu Julius Nyerere met with
top-level staff at the World Bank in Washington.
"Why have you failed?" the World Bank experts asked him.
Nyerere answered: "The British Empire left us a country with 85 per
cent illiterates, two engineers and 12 doctors. When I left office,
we had 9 per cent illiterates and thousands of engineers and
doctors. I left office 13 years ago. Then our income per capita was
twice what it is today; now we have one-third less children in our
schools and public health and social services are in ruins. During
these 13 years, Tanzania has done everything that the World Bank
and the International Monetary Fund have demanded."
And Nyerere passed the question back to the World Bank experts:
"Why have you failed?" (1)
This story indicates the importance Mwalimu Nyerere placed on
self-reliance. It is interesting; by the way, that Nyerere was
called Mwalimu (teacher) as a title. I can think of no world leader
who has been given such a title.
Self-reliance was and is a two-sided coin. On the one side of the
coin, is economic self-reliance. Nyerere challenged the structural
adjustment programmes that the World Bank and the International
Monetary Fund, the two international bodies designed to prevent
developing countries from sinking into debt, imposed on them. He
saw correctly the damage that these bodies inflicted on poor
countries by limiting their investment in education and health in
the name of controlling inflation. He challenged the IMF policies
designed to help the rich world's private banks at the expense of
the developing world's struggling economies by removing barriers to
flows of trade and capital. With hindsight, and with the immense
influence of Joseph Stiglitz's (2) revelations of how the IMF set
about destabilising poor countries, we now have a much greater
understanding of why the Bank failed.
On the other side, is educational self-reliance? Nyerere believed
in lifelong education long before it became fashionable to talk
about the concept. He believed that poor countries should spend
more on primary education than on debt repayment.
This belief was part of his philosophy of ujamaa (familyhood or
community in Kiswahili). It was based on the concept of equality,
joint action, and unified responses. He believed there could be no
freedom or social justice without equality and it was that equality
that colonialism had fundamentally distorted and even destroyed.
The concept of self-reliance in education, which he developed in
his paper 'Education for Self Reliance' (3) was aimed at
transforming Tanzania from a colonial society into a society based
on the interests of all on equality and justice within the overall
framework of ujamaa. Where colonial education was formal and took
place in classrooms and schools, education for self-reliance was
informal, took place throughout society, and was aimed at
introducing a type of education that would prepare the youth to
play a constructive role in the development of a Tanzania in which
all members shared in all things equally and fairly. He believed
that education had a central role to play in overcoming colonial
neglect and underdevelopment, a word that was much in vogue in the
1970s after the great Grenadian historian, Walter Rodney, made it
famous in his book How Europe Underdeveloped Africa. Nyerere
believed that "Education (was) not a way of escaping a country's
poverty. It (was) a way of fighting it."
Julius Kambarage Nyerere was born on 13 April 1922 in Butiama, on
the eastern shore of lake Victoria in north-west Tanzania (then
Tanganyika). His father was the chief of the small Zanaki chiefdom.
He was 12 before he started school, to which he had to walk a
considerable number of miles each day. Later, he went to the Tabora
Government Secondary School, where Roman Catholic teachers shaped
his lifelong commitment to Catholicism. He went on to train as a
teacher at Makerere University in Kampala (Uganda).
On qualifying, he taught for three years and in 1949 he went on a
government scholarship to the University of Edinburgh where he
studied for an M.A. in history and political economy. He was the
first Tanzanian to study at a British university and the second
Tanzanian to gain a university degree outside Africa. In Edinburgh,
partly through his encounter with socialist thinking of the Fabian
kind, Nyerere began to develop his particular vision of connecting
African communalism with Fabian socialism.
On his return to Tanzania, Nyerere went back to teaching and then
became a politician, as he said, "by accident". Working to bring a
number of different nationalist factions into one grouping, in 1954
he facilitated the formation of TANU (the Tanganyika African
National Union). After independence in December 1961, he was
elected President, a post he held until he resigned in 1985.
In the 1960s Tanzania was one of the world's poorest countries.
Nyerere's solution to his country's poverty was set out in the
Arusha Declaration (1967): "The objective of socialism in the
United Republic of Tanzania is to build a society in which all
members have equal rights and equal opportunities; in which all can
live in peace with their neighbours without suffering or imposing
injustice, being exploited, or exploiting; and in which all have a
gradually increasing basic level of material welfare before any
individual lives in luxury" (Nyerere 1968: 340).
In Europe and America the Tanzanian experiment with socialism was
widely regarded as a failure. In fact, this failure was still the
dominant theme in most of the obituaries written in European
newspapers on Nyerere's death in 1999. But the moving hand of
history may write a somewhat different reckoning of the man. We now
live in a period in which, hopefully, different hands write and
hands move on and ask different questions and receive different
answers. It can now be seen that Nyerere may well have understood
macro-economic policy and exchange rates poorly, but he had a
fairly clear understanding of what needed to be done as a critical
move toward full national freedom.
Not much is mentioned about the importance he attached to the role
of a national movement in a post-colonial society. He held the view
that the party should develop the ability to pronounce on policy
and to base policy on a clear national vision. When he resigned as
president he engaged in a massive grassroots programme of building
party structures, a programme directed at ensuring that policy
formulation would become a bottom-up process and that the party
would get its mandate primarily from an informed and participatory
citizenship. It would be wrong to pretend that he did not make
mistakes, in fact he admitted to some himself.
Nevertheless, his conception of self-reliance and community and
individual liberation are important principles that continue to
have merit today. As with Biko, Rodney, Garvey, and many others he
fully articulated the need for Africans to become adept at
determining their own destiny. He promoted mental and intellectual
freedom and attempted to formulate national responses that would
support such a paradigm.
He understood the concept of fair trade extremely well. And he
understood perhaps better than other African leaders that the
African continent was not getting a fair part of global
trade.
In the 1970s and 1980s the World Bank and the International
Monetary Fund did not see poverty in Africa as a threat to the
planet, as they do now. They did not seek to impose democracy and
good governance on those countries that they "adjusted
structurally". They did not, as they do now, see the national
ownership of poverty reduction programmes as essential. But Nyerere
did. He was espousing just these issues over thirty years ago when
all the IMF could tell him was to cut his social spending and to
devalue his currency. His slogan of "socialism and self-reliance"
has a powerful resonance today if understood as equity and fair
trade. He was decades ahead of his time in these matters. (4)
Few African leaders understood as he did the importance of ensuring
the total liberation of Africa and the vital need for the continent
to utilise regional trade co-operation as a building block to
continental unity, and thus as a means of positioning Africa to
compete with the rest of the world. Few leaders in the early years
supported or used his concept of ujamaa or joint community
action.
There was much more to Nyerere's socialism than ujamaa and
villagisation. His ideas on education are an essential part of his
legacy and an essential part of his economic philosophy, which we
would now regard as increasingly mainstream within the global
justice movement.
Nyerere was concerned to counteract formal colonial education. He
saw it as alienating and oriented to 'western' interests and norms.
He said: 'we have not until now questioned the basic system of
education, which we took over at the time of Independence. We have
never done that because we have never thought about education
except in terms of obtaining teachers, engineers, administrators,
etc. Individually and collectively we have in practice thought of
education as a training for the skills required to earn high
salaries in the modern sector of our economy'. (5)
Nyerere set out his vision in 'Education for Self Reliance'.
Education had to work for the common good, foster co-operation and
promote equality. Further, it had to address the realities of life
in Tanzania. He recommended the following:
* The importance of examinations and formal certification should be
downgraded
* Children should begin school at age 7 so that they would be old
enough and sufficiently mature to engage in self-reliant and
productive work when they leave school
* Primary education should be complete in itself rather than merely
serving as a means to higher education
* Students should become self-confident and co-operative, and
develop critical and inquiring minds. (6)
These policies were never fully implemented. They certainly sound
Utopian socialist in thought. But some of his ideas were
implemented. Primary education became virtually universal;
curriculum materials gained distinctively Tanzanian flavours; and
schooling used local language forms.
Nyerere was not only concerned with educating children. He was also
concerned about those adults whose educational opportunities were
stunted by colonialism. In the Declaration of Dar es Salaam Nyerere
made a call for adult education to be directed at helping people to
help themselves. He had broken free from formal education. He
thought of formal education as elitist. He recognised that learning
does not only take place in classrooms and that due weight and
recognition should be given to prior learning. His concept of adult
education was essentially pragmatic:
So if adult education is to contribute to development, it must be a
part of life - integrated with life and inseparable from it. It is
not something, which can be put into a box and taken out for
certain periods of the day or week - or certain periods of a life.
And it cannot be imposed: every learner is ultimately a volunteer,
because, however much teaching he is given, only he can
learn.
He was not talking about vocational education in which hand and
head were separated:
Further, adult education is not something, which can deal with just
"agriculture", or "health", or "literacy", or "mechanical skill",
etc. All these separate branches of education are related to the
total life a man is living, and to the man he is and will become.
Learning how best to grow soybeans is of little use to a man if it
is not combined with learning about nutrition and/or the existence
of a market for the beans. This means that adult education will
promote changes in men, and in society. And it means that adult
education should promote change, at the same time as it assists men
to control both the change which they induce, and that which is
forced upon them by the decisions of other men or the cataclysms of
nature. Further, it means that adult education encompasses the
whole of life, and must build upon what already exists. (7)
In practical terms Nyerere's approach was successful. Mass literacy
campaigns were initiated and various health and agricultural
programmes were mounted. Adult education initiatives made a
significant contribution to mobilising people for
development.
When Nyerere left Tanzanian politics in 1990, he devoted his time
to the South Commission, a body that set about seeking fair global
trade and investment. Nyerere remained committed to equity in
global economic governance. He was always a champion of the poor in
Africa. In the 1990s he also took on the role of African elder
statesman, working notably in conflict resolution. His role in
supporting our liberation has been acknowledged and needs to be a
constant affirmation by South Africans.
Rector, what did (or can) South Africans learn from Mwalimu?
In the 1990s we had to confront similar problems to those that
Nyerere faced in Tanzania in the 1960s. We had to reconstruct our
education system to eradicate racism. We had to undo the damage
done by decades of apartheid. We had to undo the damage done to the
majority of people who were denied an adequate education and we had
to create a new system that would equip our children to succeed in
a new world dominated by globalisation and information and
communication technologies.
We inherited a fragmented and dysfunctional system and we have
created a single system shaped by the imperatives of our new
constitutional dispensation that is committed to equality and
dignity and diversity. We had to look forward and backwards. We
have to look to our children and to our adults who have only
informal learning to show for themselves.
So we committed ourselves to reinventing the education and training
system so as to allow all our people to realise their full
potential. The vision for this was first set out in the Policy
Framework for Education and Training written by the Education
Department of the ANC in 1994: "All individuals should have access
to lifelong education and training irrespective of race, class,
gender, creed or age" (ANC, 1994, p.3). Lifelong learning is a
comparatively new paradigm that incorporates all forms of learning
in society. It is not a term that Nyerere ever used, but it can
easily be seen as a concept that is wide enough to fit in with his
notions of indigenous and informal learning.
We committed ourselves to three basic principles in education.
First, we committed ourselves to learning as central to both
economic prosperity and social cohesion; learning cannot simply be
driven by a need to secure economic prosperity. Second, we
committed ourselves to equity and redress. All our people have to
be given the opportunity to succeed.
Third, we committed ourselves to widening the access to learning in
our society. We committed to updating a vocational educational
system into a further educational system, in which the old skills
of an industrial era are no longer as valued as they were and in
which new skills required by an economy dominated by services and
finance industries shape the courses on offer and the shape of
institutions in which they are offered. The new educational
landscape has to be responsive to the modern global world.
Repeating that we must align courses with business requirements is
not an instrumental mantra, but an essential readjustment to a new
world that we risk ignoring only at our peril. We are committed to
making our people independent economic actors through offering them
a range of opportunities unheard of only twenty years ago.
In giving effect to these principles a great deal of store was
placed on the construction of a National Qualifications Framework;
it was to be the central lever for securing a lifelong learning
system. Lifelong learning, which is not only symbolic but also has
visionary, pedagogic and organisational implications, is a radical
way of thinking. It requires institutional structures to work in
new ways across old boundaries. There is only a limited tradition
of government departments, business and civil society working in
'connected up' ways. There are efforts by government to try to do
this, but we still have a long way to go.
The National Qualifications Framework is a flagship programme of
our democratic government. Its objectives embrace core values in
the transformation of the education and training system.
If Mwalimu were here to evaluate this transformative tool he would
probably say the initiative was excellent but the tool may be
difficult for the beneficiary to utilise effectively.
The NQF has a unique role because it is national in aspiration and
intent. It spans the entire learning system, and it is the chosen
framework in terms of which the standards of the national learning
system are set and its quality promoted and assured. It is regarded
by the Departments of Education and Labour as the vital aspect of
the national Human Resource Development Strategy, the National
Skills Development Strategy, and the transformation programmes in
higher, further and general education and training.
The NQF is a highly complex and challenging programme in several
respects. It embraces an extraordinary range of learning, including
all institution-based education and training at all levels and all
skills development in the workplace. It challenges inherited
notions of learning provision, since all learning providers,
assessors and certifying bodies must act transparently and put the
interests of the learner first. It is thus our response to the
challenge of building an education system directed at development
and full realisation of national and individual aspirations.
The challenge we face is to consistently and honestly assess
whether these progressive objectives are being met. Do our
institutions support and promote these ideals?
Significant changes have been made to education policy generally.
Much of the change overtly or at times subtly reflects the
aspirations of President Nyerere. We have not arrived at the point
of universal free primary education, but we do have free schooling
for those whose parents cannot pay. What is actually happening in
our schools? Are learners being prepared for self-reliance in a
developmental state? The new curriculum framework asserts the
development of such an individual, but unfortunately our schools
struggle to give effect to this approach. Many of our schools do
not have an African focus, the learning materials though different
do not mirror the full set of changes we need to see.
Even more telling in terms of assessment against Nyerere's
philosophy is the massive challenge of adult basic education and
illiteracy. The recent initiative of the extended public works
programme is an interesting model of community self-reliance. The
proposed link between education, skills training, and community
development will make a radical difference in the education and
progress of communities.
A sector that remains challenged is the higher education sector,
especially our universities. The current process of transforming
the institutional landscape often reveals the lack of progressive
ideals of some of our institutions.
Nyerere saw higher education as a site for intellectual growth, a
process through which Africans committed to national development
would progress, producing persons wise to the global dimensions of
neo-colonialism, wise to the challenge of creating a strategically
unified Africa, working in its own interests, wise to building
African knowledge and utilising the restructuring process as an
opportunity for building new universities.
The integration of education and training is a founding principle
of the NQF. Education and training are recognised as elements in a
continuum of learning, deserving equal respect and esteem. They
must to be provided in conjunction with one another so that
learning achievements are recognised within one national framework
that facilitates mobility along learning and career paths. The
integration principle expresses the complementary relationship
between education and training.
It does not mean that education and training are the same, or that
one is dissolved in the other, or that one is inherently superior
to the other. It also does not mean that higher education can
retain its elitist character.
Simplicity, clarity and flexibility must characterise NQF
structures and operations, and form the basis for communities of
trust involving providers and their respective stakeholders.
Structures whose responsibilities link or intersect with one
another must collaborate in terms of agreed rules of
engagement.
In closing, let me say, Rector, we need to learn to work out of our
silos - and this is why Nyerere's approach remains so relevant - to
have an integrated and holistic approach that is implemented with
passion and patience.
1 Kenneth Kaunda, "Africa has paid its dues many times", New
Statesman, 17 April 2000.
2 Joseph Stiglitz, Globalisation and its Discontents (W.W.Norton,
New York, 2002)
3 Freedom and Socialism. A Selection from Writings & Speeches,
1965-1967, (Dar es Salaam: Oxford University Press, 1968). This
book includes the Arusha Declaration; education for self-reliance;
the varied paths to socialism; the purpose is man; and socialism
and development.
4 Gerry Helleiner, "The legacies of Julius Nyerere: an economist's
reflections" (University of Toronto, Canada)", 2000.
5 Freedom and Socialism. A Selection from Writings & Speeches,
1965-1967, (Dar es Salaam: Oxford University Press, 1968), p.
267).
6 I take this summary from Y. Kassam, 'Julius Nyerere' in Z. Morsy
(ed.) Thinkers on Education, Paris: UNESCO Publishing1995:
253.
7 Julius K. Nyerere '"Development is for Man, by Man, and of Man":
The Declaration of Dar es Salaam' in Budd L. Hall and J. Roby Kidd
(eds.), Adult Education: A design for action, Oxford: Pergamon,
1978.