1. It has been brought to my attention that there is an obvious error in the order handed down in the above judgment of 17 February 2011. Paragraphs  to  of the judgment read as follows:
“ On the matter of costs, there appears to be no ongoing relationship to consider and the merits of the application were weak. Consequently I believe this is an instance in which there is no reason not to award costs, considering also that the society is not a profit making organisation.
 The application for condonation of the late referral of the applicant's statement of case is dismissed.
 No order is made as to costs.”