![]() | ![]() | |||||
| ||||||
![]() | ![]() | |||||
1. It has been brought to my attention that there is an obvious error in the order handed down in the above judgment of 17 February 2011. Paragraphs [26] to [28] of the judgment read as follows:
“[26] On the matter of costs, there appears to be no ongoing relationship to consider and the merits of the application were weak. Consequently I believe this is an instance in which there is no reason not to award costs, considering also that the society is not a profit making organisation.
Order
[27] The application for condonation of the late referral of the applicant's statement of case is dismissed.
[28] No order is made as to costs.”