Policy, Law, Economics and Politics - Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
This privately-owned website is operated and maintained by Creamer Media
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
25 May 2012
   
 
 
Article by: Creamer Media Reporter
 
DOWNLOAD
 

An appeal from the Western Cape High Court dealing with the interpretation of an Occurrence and Exception Clause in an insurance contract has been dismissed. The respondent - SMD Telecommunications CC (SMD) had concluded an insurance contract with Mutual and Federal for cover for bodily injury or death caused solely by violent, accidental, external and visible means independently of any other cause. The Exception Clause specifically excluded cover for any occurrence consequent upon any pre-existing defect or infirmity.

Mr Compton-James, a CEO of SMD died 7 months after a motor vehicle accident. His death was precipitated by a plaque rupture causing myocardial infarction. The SCA upheld the decision of the Western Cape High Court and found that on a balance of probabilities, the death was a delayed consequence of the accident and that he would not have died in May, if it had not been for the motor vehicle accident. The Court further held that Mutual and Federal could not rely on the Exception Clause because it had not been pleaded.

 

 

Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter
 
 
 
 
  Photos
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Advertisements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Related social media
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Topics on this page
 
 
 
Company
 
SMD
Facility
 
Industry Term
 
Person
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Online Publishers Association