We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
close notification
Date
: 11/11/2003
Source: Ministry of Provincial and Local Government
Title: Mufamadi: Traditional leadership Bill, NA
REMARKS BY MINISTER FS MUFAMADI IN LIEU OF INTRODUCTION OF THE
TRADITIONAL LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK BILL, National
Assembly, 11 November 2003
INTRODUCTION
The Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Bill has been a
long time in gestation. The many statutory bodies and organisations
that took part in the arduous process of consultation made an
invaluable contribution towards bringing us to where we are today.
I wish to convey my deep appreciation to all of them.
The Bill before the House addresses a variety of issues
including:
* Provision of a national framework as well as norms and standards
that will inform and guide more detailed legislation to be
developed by provinces dealing with the institution of traditional
leadership and its role in the governance processes
* The establishment and structuring of houses of traditional
leaders within all the three spheres of government
* Providing for transitional arrangements dealing, amongst other
things, with the disestablishment of certain bodies.
The Bill also provides for the establishment of a Commission on
Traditional Leadership Disputes and Claims.
CONTENTS OF THE BILL
Whilst the issues that are raised in the Bill may not be new, the
manner in which they were raised and dealt with, confirm that ours
is a society, which is in a state of flux and change. The subject
matter of this Bill therefore, is lodged within the calculus of
state-society relations. The fact that it has taken us so long to
come to this stage, and that our debates were sometimes
acrimonious, speaks to the complex dynamics of a society in
transition. It is in this context that we have to pursue the two
interrelated objectives of transforming the institution of
traditional leadership and to prompt it to place the existential
needs of the people at the centre of its concern.
Some who participated in the debates used the opportunity to remind
us of the bad old days when our erstwhile rulers sought to bolster
their exclusionary policies by asking South Africans to look at
themselves as competing ethnic units. They used the opportunity to
remind us that some in the institution connived with the apartheid
regime to deny our people access to such basic rights as the right
to organise, to freedom of expression and to liberty. Of course,
they used the opportunity to make the point that the rights, which
our people were denied, then, had a bearing on the degree to which
citizens could or could not access critical resources. They thus
accuse elements in the institution of having been complicit in
spawning conditions of indigence and underdevelopment whose legacy
we are still battling to overcome.
Our government has steadfastly refused to allow the rancour over
what happened in the past to pose an undue obstacle to a movement
into the future. After all it was our own struggle for democracy,
which reshaped the boundaries of tribal identity and brought new
expressions of solidarity amongst our people. We transformed this
country into a crucible of progressive relationships and changing
identities.
THE INSTITUTION OF TRADITIONAL LEADERSHIP
Honourable members, as we all know, our country's constitution
reckons with the reality of the institution of traditional
leadership. It enjoins us to construct relationship of
complimentarily and co-operation between the institution of
traditional leadership and democratically-instituted organs of
state. We have resisted attempts by some who sought to pose the two
in a competitive and antagonistic relationship. In this regard we
are guided by the abiding perspectives of the African National
Congress, which in 1919, adopted a constitution creating a
framework, which allowed traditional leaders to look at local
problem from the point of view of the national agenda of advancing
the interests of the African majority. At the time, the leadership
sought to prevent the institution of traditional leadership from
being integrated into colonialism and Apartheid schemes of "African
Administration". The leadership also sought to assign traditional
leaders a progressive role of designing practical and normative
solutions to inter-tribal feuds and factions on the
battlefields.
All progressive-minded South Africans will welcome the step, which
this House is about to take. For they understand that the many
developmental challenges that lie ahead can only be met by a
functionally capable state which supported by in its endeavours, by
all social formations including the institution of traditional
leadership. The goal of uniting our people behind the goal of
sustainable development is too important to be sacrificed on the
altar of narrow party-political interests.
National government departments have already started a process of
looking at functional areas of government in which co-operative
relations will be forged between the institution of traditional
leadership and government. Local Houses of traditional leaders will
have to be established so that they may join hands with district
municipalities to advance the cause of enhancing levels of service
delivery and creating conditions for sustainable development. We
should not allow our focus to be diverted from these goals by
politicians who may have estimated that their political fortunes
turn on ethnic entrepreneurship.
CONCLUSION
In these few words Madame Speaker, allow me once more, to thank all
those who played a role in bringing this Bill to fruition. I lack
the words to express the full measure of our Ministry and
department's appreciation for the role played by Advocate Seth
Nthai and other members of the White Paper Task Team. I also wish
to extend a word of gratitude to Honourable Yunus Carrim and other
members of the Portfolio Committee for the diligent manner in which
they conducted the public hearings. I also wish to thank Inkosi
Simon Gumede, Nkosi Mwelo Nonkonyana, Mr S Phiri, Mayor Amos
Masondo, MEC Gugile Nkwinti and MEC Darkey Africa for devoting
themselves so conscientiously and successfully to steering the
National Coalition of Traditional Leaders and the Executive,
towards a working consensus.
Madame Speaker and Honourable members, I commend this Bill to the
House.
Issued by: Ministry of Provincial and Local Government
11 November 2003