We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
close notification
Date
: 06/06/2003
Source: Ministry of Environmental Affairs and Tourism
Title: Moosa: Environmental Affairs and Tourism Dept Budget Vote
2003/2004, NCOP
MR MOHAMMED VALLI MOOSA MINISTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS AND
TOURISM, POLICY REVIEW SPEECH, National Council of Provinces, 6
June 2003
Madam Chairperson
Honourable Members
MECs
Distinguished Guests
In September last year the leaders of the modern world stood
together in Johannesburg and adopted a far-reaching global
programme for sustainable development. This was a watershed moment
for South Africa. We have been widely acclaimed for negotiating the
Johannesburg Plan of Implementation - it is visionary, profound and
practical. It gives hope and promise to all the struggling and
marginalised people of the world. It also challenges us to deliver
on its targets.
In South Africa sustainable development is the unifying thread that
runs through all of our work. We are nearly ten years into South
Africa's democratic order and we now can state with confidence that
our work and collective efforts have paid off. Our own home-grown
version of sustainable development, the Reconstruction and
Development Programme, has delivered benefits for millions upon
millions of South Africans. We have made gains that benefit the
poorest of communities. In the Department of Environmental Affairs,
through decisive interventions in the tourism, fishing and
conservation industries, we have touched the lives of all South
Africans, and realised the implementation of a sustainable
development programme which stands to benefit us and our future
generations.
Provinces have been key partners in the realisation of these
objectives. This partnership was probably best demonstrated in the
successful hosting of the WSSD, in which the Gauteng Province and
Johannesburg Metro played an outstanding role. Special recognition
must go to the Province of Gauteng, and the Johannesburg Metro, for
their contribution and enthusiasm in the preparations and hosting
of the summit. The Gauteng province's "Greening of the Summit"
project set a new world standard in the minimisation of the
environmental impact of large events and conferences. Other
provinces and organised local government contributed significantly
to the government negotiating team and the organisation of side and
parallel events.
A special thank you to Johannesburg. You successfully used this
great global gathering to reinvent and brand the city as a world
city among the most advanced in the world. Perceptions of the city
has changed dramatically. It is a cool and safe place with a highly
efficient modern infrastructure and warm and friendly
citizens.
According to an independent study by the Bureau for Market
Research, Ikwla Structured Financial Products and Urban Econ, the
WSSD injected over R 8 billion into our economy. This is compared
to an investment of about R620 million contributed by government,
private sector, international sponsors and donor agencies. The
latter two contributors contributed about 60% of these funds. The
summit's black economic empowerment target set at 30% was exceeded
as we recorded a high of 48%.
The financing and organising of the Summit serves as a practical
manifestation of section 41(h)(ii) of the constitution which states
that "All spheres of government and all organs of state within each
sphere must co-operate with one another in mutual trust and good
faith by assisting and supporting one another."
This spirit of co-operation is being carried forward in our
preparations for another equally significant international event.
From 8 to 17 September this year, South Africa will be hosting the
World Parks Congress in Durban, KwaZulu- Natal. We have been
requested to host this event in recognition of our successful park
management system and transfontier parks initiatives. It is
expected that about 2300 participants, including experts in the
field of protected area management from around the world, will
attend this occasion. Under the leadership of South African
National Parks, and working with conservation agencies in all the
provinces, we have already set in place processes that will ensure
a successful conference and excellent logistics. The province of
KwaZulu-Natal and the Ethekwini Metro will play a particularly
important role in this regard. Part of the organisation of the
Congress will include pre and post event tours across the country.
With the experience we gathered from WSSD, and the confirmation of
South Africa's abilities through events like the recent Cricket
World Cup, we are assured that the World Parks Congress will be
nothing but a success.
Chairperson, our working together in the spirit of co-operative
governance has allowed us to contribute to a better life for all.
The MECs for environment, conservation and tourism deserve
particular credit for making the Environment and Tourism MINMECs
into dynamic and effective vehicles for co-operation. In addition,
through the Committee for Environmental Co-ordination we are able
to report significant progress in the promotion of integration and
co-ordination of environmental functions between national and
provincial governments. As a result of this, the suite of draft
legislation that we will be tabling to you this year further aligns
the work of organs of state - this includes legislation on
biological diversity, protected areas, coastal resources,
pollution, waste and air quality. These instruments will provide
legal protection for our country's environment, promote sustainable
development, and assist us in meeting many of the targets that we
negotiated at WSSD.
For the first time, national and provincial departments have put in
place a comprehensive set of environmental management plans. On my
department's website is now available:-
* The first cycle of gazetted environmental implementation and
management plans of scheduled national and provincial
departments;
* An alignment report that is focused on some of the key
environmental impacting and managing sectors; and
* Annual reports that provides the status of environmental
implementation plans.
We have approached the Office of the Auditor General to assist with
the development of a mechanism that will enable us to monitor
compliance with environmental management and implementation
plans.
Following on our success in implementing the new regulations on
plastic bags, provinces and national government departments are
co-ordinating efforts around tackling other waste streams. We will
shortly be taking over the functions of regulating landfills from
the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, and transferring some
of these responsibilities to provinces. We are collaborating in
tackling the serious backlogs in municipal waste management and
recycling.
Chairperson, I must on this occasion congratulate the winners of
the 2002 Cleanest Town Competition:
In September we will be announcing the winners of the second round
of the Cleanest Town Competition. The competition is proving to be
a successful campaign in mobilising municipalities and communities
around the National Waste Management Strategy.
One of the most far reaching interventions around co-operative
governance in the last decade has been the introduction of the
system of environmental impact assessments (EIA's). Inevitably, as
we are in the process of reconstruction and development of our
country, we are bound to impact on our environment and natural
resources. These impacts might be both positive and/or negative,
hence the importance of regulating the impact of development on the
environmental. Some EIAs are considered at a national level, but
the vast majority of development applications are processed by
provinces. This last year my department has processed 88 EIA(s),
which comprise projects estimated at a value of R43 billion. These
include:
* The N4 platinum toll highway which is to form part of the main
link between the West Coast and East Coast;
* Coega industrial development and Coega Harbour. This focused on
the rezoning of land use from agricultural industrial and the
development of a deep-water port;
* The construction of an underground natural gas pipeline from
Mozambique's Temane and Pande gas fields to Secunda in Mpumalanga.
Sasol will be using the gas which is expected to start flowing at
the end of 2003;
* The development of support infrastructure within the Great
Limpopo Transfontier Park;
* Twenty-nine applications related to Government's Poverty Relief
Programme.
The EIA system is an essential part of the development and
investment process, and the above projects give some idea of the
scale and value of many of the projects we consider. This is why we
are concerned about capacity problems in some provinces which
causes delays in delivery and private sector investments. The
amendments to NEMA Chapter 5, which I will be tabling shortly, are
intended to address some of these problems. Amongst others, we will
enable government to charge a moderate fee for processing EIAs, we
will establish a professional body of EIA practitioners, we will
allow for delegation of certain EIA functions to municipalities
which have the capacity to administer them, and we will revise the
overall allocation of EIA functions between the three spheres of
government. We are backing this up with extensive work on training
and capacity building, and the installation of a country-wide
electronic processing system.
Provinces and national government also collaborate closely in the
fields of biodiversity management and conservation We are similarly
bringing substantial legislation before this house that will
improve the system of co-operative governance in this field. The
Protected Areas Bill was published for public comment towards the
end of 2002, followed shortly by the Biodiversity Bill and First
NEMA Amendment Bill on compliance and enforcement. During this
period, information seminars were held across the country and
stakeholders were invited to provide written comments. I am proud
to announce that these Bills have now been submitted to Parliament
for consideration.
These Bills deal with a very important aspect of our heritage.
South Africa boasts some 403 terrestrial protected areas, with a
total area of 6 638 658ha or about 5.44% of our total land area.
Twenty-two of these protected areas are national parks, and their
total area make up 53,09% of our total. A further 13,82% are state
forests in terms of the National Forests Act.
Provinces are legally responsible for 30,51% of South Africa's
protected area estate.
In terms of current budget, SANParks (South African National
Parks), responsible for the management of 53% of the protected area
estate in South Africa is allocated R77 823 000, while the nine
provinces, responsible for 30% of the of the protected area estate,
allocate over R598 048 000.
Two years ago (May 2001) government released a document entitled A
bioregional approach to South Africa's protected areas. In that
document, we set a goal for expanding the area under protection
from 5,44% to 8% by the year 2010. In the same document, we set out
two further principles for improving the management of our
protected area by consolidating the existing areas where possible
and rationalising their management. I now believe it is time to
take a long hard look at conservation management in South Africa as
a whole, and apply the same principles. I do not believe we can
afford the number of management agencies we have in South
Africa.
Let us not forget that the allocation of powers and functions to
provinces was negotiated in the constitution-making process, at
times, as part of horse trading. The final outcome does not in all
cases reflect logic or what is in the best interest of the country.
These were compromises the ANC made with the NP and DP. The latter
parties basically argued for as long a list of provincial powers as
possible, regardless of whether it made sense or not.
Unfortunately, some among us now regard as sacrosanct that which
came into being because of the attempts of apartheid parties to
fragment our country. Ironically, the NNP and the DA - now that
they do not control any province - have shifted away from arguing
for more federalism.
In practical terms, can South Africa afford 10 parks boards? Does
it make sense for a province to spend enormous resources on
provincial parks for very little gain?
There is, of course, nothing unconstitutional about a parks board
in each province. But, the disservice to conservation and to
citizens deriving benefits from parks is the establishment of
financially unsustainable models. A system, which makes
conservation compete for provincial funds with the glaring health
care, education and social welfare needs, without any obvious
benefits like economic growth and job creation, is not sustainable
and will fail.
A situation where the same taxpayer pays almost eight times more to
maintain provincial parks compared to what he or she pays to
maintain national parks is, frankly speaking, an unsustainable
model for conservation. Along with our national and provincial
parks, the country's four World Heritage Sites based in the Western
Cape, Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal are amongst the major tourist
attractions. Our rich history, biodiversity and culture have
enabled us to make significant progress in this regard. We have now
submitted proposals for four additional sites. These are Mapungubwe
in Limpopo, Vredefort Dome in the Free State, Cape Floristic Region
in the Western Cape and Makapan's Valley in Limpopo.
It is our view that conservation and economic development must go
hand in hand. Our conservation areas, rather than being a burden on
taxpayers, must contribute to job creation and socio-economic
upliftment. Our natural heritage must continue to serve as a
foundation of the tourism industry.
Madam Chairperson, ever since 1994 we have experienced a boom in
our tourism sector, a confirmation that our international marketing
campaign is working. As the fastest growing tourism destination in
the world, South Africa is indeed becoming a tourism nation. The
World Travel and Tourism Council found that tourism contributes
6,9% of South Africa's workforce. The World Tourism Organisation
projects that by 2011 the tourism industry will be contributing 11%
global GDP and account for 19% of total employment and more than
260 million.
Inspired by the belief that tourism is everybody's business, we
have now started to make interventions which will sustainably grow
this sector, whilst ensuring that all parts of South Africa benefit
from it. The strength of tourism in South Africa is also enabled by
the unique partnership between government, business and
communities, a partnership to which provinces are crucial. In
marketing our country as a leading tourism destination we have
mutually agreed that South African Tourism will lead the
international marketing campaign, while provinces will concentrate
on the domestic market. We have extensively discussed the key icons
that will be used in our international campaign, and there is a
collective agreement that we must use a limited set of core icons
in order to maximise our impact in a competitive global
industry.
Chairperson, as I reported last year, MinMec has agreed that the
annual celebration of World Tourism Day, on 27 September, must
rotate amongst provinces. Following celebrations which were hosted
by the Eastern Cape in 2001 and celebrations held at Bakgatla
Village in North West in 2002, we will this year observe the
occasion in the Northern Cape. Provinces are again encouraged to
join national government in celebrating our successes and gains in
tourism during Tourism Month by organising celebrations throughout
the month in their localities.
Chairperson, another important area of co-operation with provinces
is around coastal management. This year I will be tabling
legislation which, for first time, introduces a comprehensive
system of co-operative governance for the coast. I would like to
express my gratitude to the provinces for their assistance with the
management of our coast line, and their contributions to the
functions of compliance and enforcement along the coast.
Greater stability, transformation and growth can now be observed in
our fishing sector. Even sceptics are starting to realise that it
is only government's carefully constructed allocation system that
will provide sustainable livelihoods for all in this sector. In
fact, internationally we are envied for our well-managed marine
resources. We are proud of the fact that right now not a single
foreign vessel has a permit to fish in our waters.
During Apartheid era the total allowable catch of the biggest
fishery, the hake trawl sector, was divided among only six
white-owned companies. Today, 73% of right holders are majority
black-owned. This is the general trend in most fisheries. We will
be extending this work into a number of new fisheries this year,
including squid. We will restructure the system of abalone rights
in order to put this valuable resource more directly in the hands
of local communities. We will also extend our work on subsistence
fishing this year to bring further benefits to coastal
communities.
As I indicated last year, the illegal poaching of abalone has been
a major concern. I am though happy to announce that we are cracking
down on trespassers in this sector. Through a partnership between
my department, the Department of Justice, South African Police
Service, South African Defence Force and the special operations
unit, the Scorpions, we have started to breakdown syndicates which
have been the cause of unjustified plunder of this natural
resource. Some of our gains include: -
* The establishment of an Environment Court in Hermanus, enabling
speedy prosecution and stiff sentencing of offenders;
* The conviction and sentencing of Hout Bay Fishing Industries for
over-fishing and corruption;
* R 500 000,00 fine on the owners of Golden Eagle for fishing in
our waters without a foreign fishing licence.
The tide has turned. We are together making the environmental,
tourism and fishing sectors deliver real and tangible benefits to
people and communities across the country. At the same time we are
building a patriotism and unity around these areas of our work that
is truly helping to build our nation. We are determined to succeed
and succeed we will.
Chairperson, I would like to again report to the NCOP that this
country has, without exception, a dedicated team of MECs for
environment and tourism. They are women and men who do not hesitate
to challenge national government in the interest of their
provinces, and each one has always placed the interest of the
country first. It is a team I have received co-operation from and
one I truly enjoy working with.
My thanks also to the team in my ministry, the department and the
institutions linked to the department for their dedication and
patriotism.
My thanks also to you, Rev. Moatse, and members of the select
committee for your support and dedication. I look forward to
working with you in particular around the processing of our Bills
this year, and hope that I can rely on the same level of support
and dedication that you have always shown.
I thank you.
Issued by Ministry of Environmental Affairs and Tourism
6 June 2003