We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
close notification
Date
: 12/05/2006
Source: Mpumalanga Provincial Government
Title: Makwetla: SALGA Provincial Members’ Assembly
Opening address by Premier TSP Makwetla at the South African
Local Government Association (SALGA) Provincial Members’
Assembly
Programme Director, Namane Masemola, SALGA National Chairperson
Mayor Amos Masondo and other members of your the national executive
here present,
SALGA Acting Provincial Chairperson and SALGA Mpumalanga executive
members,
The Mayor of Mbombela, honourable Justice Nsibande,
District and local mayors,
Honourable councillors,
Municipal managers and officials,
Distinguished guests,
Ladies and gentlemen;
It is once again an honour and an inspiration to have been invited
to be part of the opening of your annual members’ assembly in
our province Mpumalanga this year.
It behoves me, on behalf of our province, to take this opportunity
to congratulate you all most heartily for having been elected by
your respective municipalities to represent your communities in our
local councils for the next five years. You undoubtedly
distinguished yourselves by succeeding to be endorsed in what was a
fiercely contested election.
This is an eloquent statement of the confidence communities have in
you and we wish you all the success in your fresh duties.
Programme Director, let me proceed and immediately welcome to this
forum our councillors from Bushbuckridge who are now part of the
Mpumalanga local government movement. We are under no doubt that
their participation as part of us will go a long way in making us
wise and enriching our collective experience.
We have observed before that the importance of local government
derives largely from its position as the critical interface between
the government service delivery system and the people. It is with
this understanding of the importance of local government in mind
that we have to tackle the challenge of halving poverty and
unemployment by 2014.
It is for this reason that each and every ward councillor must be
the custodian of all the critical information on economic
activities, unemployment and poverty in their ward. In fact a ward
councillor needs to be familiar with the poverty profile of the
families in their area. At least he or she should know the most
indigent families in their area and be certain that they are
accessing social security grants. That is the most tangible form of
public service.
Over and above familiarity with the poverty profile of their ward,
each ward councillor needs to be familiar with new economic
investment activities and trends as well as growth potential in
their ward and municipality. It is only when such information is at
our fingertips that we can influence council to develop informed
strategic Integrated Development Plans (IDPs) and Local Economic
Development (LEDs).
In the medium to long term our policies must create a change in the
profile of our population, making more and more people employable
and less dependent on government grants. It is in this area that
councillors must wear the important hat of facilitators of economic
growth. There is consensus in government and in the private sector
that for us to undermine poverty and unemployment the way we wish
to our economy must average six percent growth between now and
2014. For councillors to be able to play the catalytic role towards
economic growth, they need to appreciate all elements of their
local economies.
It is not enough, though important, to simply be aware of the
spatial disparities in economic development inherited from
apartheid. There is no doubt that we inherited spatial disparities
that created a disjuncture between the location of people and the
location of economic activities. The area of Moloto, which supplies
labour to economic activities in Tshwane is the best indication of
this disjuncture.
For us to exercise leadership, however, we must also recognise that
globally some form of spatial disparity in development is actually
a norm. We must also recognise that development is a movement away
from the rural economy to greater urbanisation. In fact in the case
of our country, studies show that not only are the majority of poor
people located in the high value generating urban areas but the
migration pattern is continuing in that direction from poor rural
locations. In addition, most of the wealth of the country is
produced in a small percentage of the country’s area where
these poor are located. More specifically, 93 percent of the
national economy is located on 30 percent of the land. It is no
wonder that 79 percent of the population including 70 percent of
those living below the minimum living level, lives in this 30
percent where there is a perceived potential for livelihoods.
Our province is no exception. The majority of our population
including the majority of the poor is located in areas of high
economic activities such as Nelspruit and its surroundings, the
Witbank-Middleburg area and surroundings, and Secunda and
surroundings. These realities of urbanisation and spatial economic
disparities pose a real development dilemma. In our quest to
facilitate economic growth we need to recognise that urban areas
provide the greatest potential for growth while at the same time
tackling rural poverty. It is a dilemma of balancing current
considerations with future trends.
Where resources are limited, difficult choices and decisions have
to be made and that is the hallmark of leadership. Redirecting
investments to poor areas with little potential for growth might
not necessarily be the most effective way of spending limited
resources. The realities of spatial development including migration
and urbanisation suggest that expenditure in poor areas should be
more of a social nature targeted at poverty alleviation rather than
economic investment which has little potential for growth and
labour absorption.
Colleagues and comrades, the reason why I am belabouring this
matter is simply because as we all know the challenge of local
government during your term of office is to be agents for economic
development and growth.
To the extent that the quest for the six percent growth to halve
poverty and unemployment is premised largely on infrastructure
development, we must avoid the dissipation of our infrastructure
spending efforts through scattered unfocussed spending. It has been
stated before in various forums that greater impact will be
achieved if a school is built in the same area where a road is
being built and a clinic is planned for. We have a short space of
time in which to ramp our economy to higher levels of growth. Our
councillors must begin to play a more catalytic role in
facilitating higher levels of growth. Unless we work smart to
maximise the impact of our expenditure on infrastructure even if
our budgets were to be doubled we would see little impact.
Programme Director, recently we accomplished a significant
initiative in the history of government relations with business. We
recently co-hosted a conference with National African Federated
Chamber of Commerce (NAFCOC) aimed at addressing the many
disappointments we have encountered as government with
predominantly emerging business from whom we procure goods and
services. The aim was to strengthen the partnership between
government and business for efficient and effective service
delivery. I am happy that a sizeable number of local government
leadership and managers participated.
We believe that the challenges that the Loskop Conference
addressed, permeate local government as well. This interaction with
business proved valuable because it allowed government to look at
the supply chain process and address the impact it has on service
providers’ ability to deliver what is expected of them.
Business in turn articulated their challenges and flaws.
One of the key lessons from the conference has been the extent to
which the supply chain system in government can either build or
destroy small, medium and micro enterprises (SMMEs). In the process
of procuring goods and services we have a responsibility to build
growing sustainable businesses and not to ruin emerging
businesses.
Further work on identified problem areas will be done in order to
come up with new recommendations that all should adopt.
One of the challenges we are going to grapple with in the next five
years is to achieve the alignment of development plans of all three
spheres of government. National has promised us the requisite
support in order to realise this critical imperative.
I wish to take advantage of the platform of this members’
assembly of SALGA in the province once again to record our
appreciation of the coordinating work your organisation is
sponsoring to make our municipalities and councils function
better.
This function is going to progressively increase if the face of our
province is to transform evenly over the next five years.
Our programme for the next five years is unambiguous; electricity
for all; water and sanitation for all. Our politics are about
economic development and the roll out of this infrastructure. We
must become activists and self made experts on this infrastructure
roll out.
I wish you some very fruitful deliberations and hope that you
emerge from this conference with higher quality plans that will
change the lives of our people.
I thank you!
Issued by: Office of the Premier, Mpumalanga Provincial
Government
12 May 2006