We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
close notification
Just
ice Minister Penuell Maduna again stood by his chief
prosecutor, the national director of public prosecutions Bulelani
Ngcuka, yesterday.
The minister announced through his counsel, advocate Norman
Arendse, that he disbelieved allegations about remarks that Ngcuka
was alleged to have made at an off-the-record meeting.
Arendse told the Hefer Commission at its public hearing in
Bloemfontein that Maduna was shocked when he first heard the
allegations.
"They were totally out of character." Arendse added that Ngcuka
reported to his minister on the meeting after he had held it.
He was referring to what has now become a controversial briefing
Ngcuka gave to a selected group of black editors on July 24.
The national director of public prosecutions called it shortly
after an e-mail containing a range of allegations against him
started circulating in the media.
Former City Press editor Vusi Mona, who also attended, has since
lodged an official complaint against Ngcuka with the Public
Protector.
Mona accused Ngcuka of making racist remarks at the meeting.
He further maintained that Ngcuka had violated people's
constitutional rights by disclosing confidential information about
their private matters.
Those Mona believed to have been violated included Deputy President
Jacob Zuma, against whom Ngcuka's office has since established a
"prima facie" corruption case.
When Ngcuka earlier announced this, Maduna also showed his
meaningful support.
The minister was at his chief prosecutor's side when Ngcuka
informed the media that he had nevertheless decided against
charging Zuma because the chances of conviction were too
slim.
Mona appeared to crumble under gruelling cross-examination
yesterday.
He was grilled about his allegation that Ngcuka had abused his
official powers at the July briefing.
He also had to repeatedly defend his stated motive for breaching
the confidentiality convention of an off-the-record briefing.
Mona maintained that he felt it his "citizen's duty" to report
Ngcuka two months after the meeting to the Public Prosecutor.
He denied that he was influenced by Ngcuka's announcement of the
prima facie corruption case against Zuma.
Mona also denied that allegations against himself, as reported in
the Star newspaper, prompted him to accuse Ngcuka.
The Star questioned Mona's ethics by alleging that he was involved
with a communications company that won a Mpumalanga government
contract.
Mona admitted eventually that he was for a few days under the wrong
impression that Ngcuka's investigating unit, the Scorpions, were
investigating him for this. This was later corrected.
Mona further conceded that he was reckless to allow publication of
the first reports that revealed the spying allegations against
Ngcuka and appeared in the City Press.
He denied that the reports were deliberate attempts to mislead the
paper's readers.
He will face Ngcuka's counsel, Advocate Marumo Moerane, in
cross-examination today.
Meanwhile, the SA National Editors' Forum (Sanef) yesterday issued
a strongly worded statement against former City Press editor Vusi
Mona for unprofessional conduct in relation to his appearance and
evidence before the Hefer commission of inquiry.
Sanef accused Mona of breaching all the rules of professional
conduct in attending a confidential briefing and then disclosing
the content of the meeting.
Retired Appellate Judge Joos Hefer was appointed by President Thabo
Mbeki to probe National Director of Public Prosecutions Bulelani
Ngcuka's past and to determine whether Ngcuka was abusing his
office to persecute apartheid-era opponents.
One of the incidents cited in support of the second charge is an
off-the-record briefing by Ngcuka of a group of editors during,
which he reportedly defamed several prominent persons and made
racist comments.
"Mona, who has left his publication under a cloud concerning a
serious conflict of interest, has compounded his earlier
publication of the apparent minutes of the Ngcuka briefing.
"Unlike most of the media community who believe the media should
not be involved in the Hefer commission, Mona has chosen to use the
commission to repeat and enlarge upon his earlier breach of
confidence," Sanef said.
The editor's body added that the principle of confidentiality of
sources and information was regarded as sacrosanct by journalists,
many of whom had gone to jail to uphold the principle.
Background and confidential briefings were common practice in
journalism.
Editors were experienced in contexualising such briefings and
retaining their own independence in regard to them, the association
added.
"Mona may have had reasons for disquiet at what he says took place
at the briefing, but the professional rules of journalistic conduct
provide for an ethical standard of conduct to deal with such
situations," Sanef said.
"If he did not accept the confidentiality of the briefing, he
should have stated that at the time and left, but once he stayed
after Ngcuka had stated it was a confidential briefing, he was in
our view bound to abide by those terms.
"For him to remain at the briefing and then state later that he did
not accept it was in confidence is a gross breach of professional
ethics," Sanef charged.
"Sanef believes that in disclosing the contents of the briefing
Mona has seriously discredited himself as a journalist.
Sanef will continue to promote ethical journalism amongst its
members in order to maintain the public's trust in the
media".
Sanef's national council last week resolved to develop detailed
guidelines for journalists about professional participation in
background and confidential briefings.
The council at the weekend also decided to distance itself from
journalists and editors who breached their duty to keep
confidences.
Sanef deputy-chairman Guy Berger yesterday night told Sapa Mona had
been a member, albeit an inactive one. Berger said Mona's
membership effectively terminated when he resigned from the City
Press.
Asked whether the organisation would have acted against Mona if he
had still been a member, Berger replied "yes". – Sapa.