Policy, Law, Economics and Politics - Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
This privately-owned website is operated and maintained by Creamer Media
18 March 2010
   
 
 
Article by: Carla Thomaz

The Law Society of South Africa’s Legal Education and Development (LEAD) division, the deans of law schools and faculties and other stakeholders are participating in a nationwide review of the Bachelor of Laws (LLB) degree curriculum to make recommendations for upgrading the curriculum. This is in response to ongoing concerns about the declining quality of law graduates.

“For the last four years, we have been in discussion with government and universities about reviewing the LLB degree. The process, which was started by the Council for Higher Education, has now entered into its first discussions with the profession,” says LEAD director Nic Swart.

Several legal experts have proposed the reintroduction of a five-year LLB degree at all law faculties. The LLB degree was shortened from five years to four years, by the Department of Justice, in 1998, to make it more accessible to previously disadvantaged students.

Some experts believe a con-sequence of the four-year degree has been that students are focusing only on the basic elements of law. This, Swart explains, means that students do not have time to do subjects that could provide them with more insight into the society in which they will practise. Further, he adds, there is not enough consultation between universities on the courses that are relevant to a law practice, resulting in one faculty offering 90 courses and another only 24 courses, making some degrees less relevant for a practice.

The wide choice of subjects offers graduates some insight into a number of subjects, he says. “Our proposal is to rather limit the number of subjects being offered and focus on those that are more important.”

Having little knowledge of a number of subjects results in graduates experiencing difficulties in accessing new fields, says Swart. He adds that this is exacerbated by concerns about the level of teaching provided to students.

“A lack of knowledge and an inadequate level of teaching poses a risk to the client and to the profession. We have determined what the minimum requirements should be for a student in certain areas, and our view is that the LLB degree should satisfy these minimum requirement levels,” he says.

An investigation will be carried out to determine if the structure of the degree is ade-quate for the demands of the profession, as well as the ade-quacy of the foundational skills the degree provides.

“The review needs to get to grips not only with the lack of numeracy skills, but also with the apparent general lack of functional literacy. Many students are graduating without being able to draw up basic legal documents,” Swart says.

The LEAD has expressed concern about the declining educational standards of entrants to the profession. Not only is numeracy a significant problem, but the apparent general lack of functional literacy also has to be improved, he says. Swart explains that many law students, who achieve excellent results during their studies, cannot write an essay, yet writing is an essential professional skill in almost every branch of legal practice.

Swart believes that most of the inadequacies are a result of a poor schooling system, the results of which need to be dealt with at tertiary and post- graduate institutions, as it is imperative for graduates to have the necessary literacy and numeracy skills.

“Universities need to take full advantage of grants offered by the Attorneys Fidelity Fund, which contributes to the enhancement of law programmes,” he says.

Some universities use the funds to conduct literacy, numeracy and tutor programmes for students, and several training programmes have already been developed at law faculties to deal with the deficiency in numeracy skills. The LEAD, in turn, continues to look for ways to bridge this gap by creating courses for young lawyers at a postgraduate and postadmission level.

“We would like to improve the standards of practice of post-graduates further, and the next initiative we are considering is to introduce mandatory continuing professional development for attorneys,” he says.

Law is changing at a fast pace, explains Swart, particularly as we live in a new dispensation in South Africa and the country is part of the global market.

“There are a number of changes in terms of global trade per- spectives and it is important for attorneys to be updated in their specialised area of the law, but also to be trained in new areas of practice,” concludes Swart.

Edited by: Brindaveni Naidoo
 
11 Comments
 
Readers Comments
 
 
The time is propitious for the modern LLB curriculum to come to speed with current fast global developments, particularly in South Africa where our unique constitution runs the risk of under delivery to its generous promises. There is a need for a critical mass in the South African population who fully understand the basic tenets and legal imperatives in order to understand the real message carried by our noble constitution. Lawyers have to be educators in their own right and they need to ensure that clients understand their full rights and obligations and can articulate these fully within the context of their problem case. We applaud this initiative and hope that from now on there will be indicators where LEAD monitor the "level" of LLBs in South Africa and provide an annual report to this effect. Dr. Stranger KGAMPHE
Dr Stranger KGAMPHE
15 Jan 2010 -
 
 
 
LLB alone is not enough to be a lawyer. We need social science and humanities to be part of this LLB. Because LLB alone is making one to be a prosecutor. To be an Attorney or Advocate you need a lot to know about a society we are living in. We need politics, international relations, languages, sociology, drama, accounting, economics, psychology and so on. If one knows this non-legal subjects, she will know how to interpret a legislation. Further she or he will understand judgements very well. More importantly you will know how to write essays without using legal english.Andrew
Andrew
15 Jan 2010 -
 
 
 
Mr Swart why is the evening course offered by LEAD at UJ (from Feb to Jul) not recognized as an approved course by the Law Society for the purpose of sitting for the Attorneys admissions examination. My understanding is that the course content is the same as the so-called full-time course. Renay
Renay
15 Jan 2010 -
 
 
 
This is a wlecome move and it does point to the root cause of the problem - lack of preparedness of freshman students when they leave high school. The distinction between the 5 yr and 4 yr curriculum is neither here nor there as in my 8 yrs of teaching and researching law noone has produced credile studies showing that a BA or BComm would make a good laywer. Many countries (inc Botswana, Namibia , Zambia, Zimbabwe, UK, Canada & Aus e.t.c) offer the LLB or JD as a 4 yr straight degree with good results, only needing to include a few foundation humanitie scourses in the first yr to ground the students. The real problem is our schooling system and secondly the poor design of some curriculum. Currently I teach students who in their 3rd and 4th yr take over 13 courses in a yr most of which are totally unnecessary to be a lawyer and they compromise the capacity of the student to do deeper learning and learn how to effectively write and communicate. Such curriculum leaves little time for engaged research and proper writing of assignments e.t.c. Added to this is a little talked about problem - many of the so called professors (typical white male) have never learnt how to educate a lawyer(some just have their LLB- and have never done a research degree) - they are lawyers who learnt university teaching on the go almost replaying how they were taught.As a result some of these full professors themselves cannot write proper essays and publish in journals one may call publication circles where they are co-editors or their old friends are editors recyling the same ideas.This comprimises the quality of teaching at law schools in a subtle way.And most of these control the curriculum and are very resistatnt to modern interventiont to build the capacity of law educators.
Anonymous
15 Jan 2010 -
 
 
 
Why lengthen the duration of the degree. Why not extend the period the prospective practitioner does his/her articles. After all qualifications are based on theory and the actual practice you acquire is in the field. I fully agree that the current education system has failed the nation regarding literacy, yet to extend the duration of the LLB will not solve the problem, and may even worsen it as people will drop out and may not even opt for the degree taking the costs thereof into account.
Anon
15 Jan 2010 -
 
 
 
I personally think that the problem with the LLB degree is that students learn the theory, but in practise there is a wide difference. Each subject must be more practical. For example, In Family Law you learn the law, but you dont learn about the Family Advocate and the details that you neeed to be able to actually bring such applications. This counts for most of the subjects. Theory is critical but also teach the students how to implement it.
Yolandi Jansen
15 Jan 2010 -
 
 
 
i support the notion of reviewing of the LLB. the current calibre of students who gradute are two world apart than those who extensively studied the old LLB. I propose that law students be compelled to do practical legal work throught the sytems. However; universities must be prepared to invest in quality reputable lectures who can be able to attest to a law student how the law is bein applied in our courts
priceman mngomezulu
15 Jan 2010 -
 
 
 
I note the comment in the main article about the quality of the teachers of law. Ideally the teachers of pure law subjects, such as company law. and the law of contract, should be practitioners or former practitioners, who are able to teach the subject with experience of the practical application of what they are teaching.In addition, emphasis should be placed on teaching the etics of the profession. From what I have read recently, this is an area of study which has been somewhat neglected.
richard horn s c (retired)
16 Jan 2010 -
 
 
 
I fully support Mr. Andrew in his statement stating that LLB alone is absolutely not enough to make one a good Lawyer or an attorney.Of course to be a prosecutor LLB is more than enough for those who want to be prosecutors, to add on what he raised life skills and a bit of business knowledge is also critical and crucial for student who want to Lawyers and advocates.
Percy
04 Feb 2010 -
 
 
 
I am currently a LLb student in my 3rd year of study and i feel that a LLB alone is inadequate. We should be following the standards set by industrialised and first world countries and i feel that a minimum requirement should be a LLM. We have too many attorneys, especially in small towns focussing on everything, instead of specialising in nothing and this leads to inadequate assistance from your attorney. In Australia and America an LLm is a minimum requirement, with Americans having to attend a proffessional law school after there completion of there undergraduate studies. Why is this not the case in south Africa? in first world countries the law proffesion is seen as one of the most respected proffessions around, getting higher salaries than most and also getting a higher social status, and that is all due to there strong academic standards required to become an attorney. We take four years of study to become an attorney and two years of articles, overseas it takes 7 years only to have completed there post graduate law school, which after they have to write there bar exams. Students who dont know what to study normally just apply for an llb because of all the easy subjects, and alsoafter four years you have a honours degree. This is unacceptable and it should be as hard to become a lawyer as it is to become a doctor.......................
keane brentley
14 Feb 2010 -
 
 
 
I graduated the four year LLB curriculum in 2009. I feel that the prejudice emanates from the inablity of institutions to standardise courses offered in such institutions collectively. For instance, in one institution you are offered maritme Law and in another you only get Customary Law. In essence this essentially means we are doing two different degrees under the umbrella of LLB. Thereafter we cannot compete for the same jobs. Another aspect I would like to raise is about the L.E.A.D school of legal practice, I attended the Johannesburg centre and I feel that their administration needs to be reviewed. There was a mistake in my attendance certificate and i have liased with those who are in charge many times but I havent recieved anything. I finished attending the school in June 2009 and I gave them the certificate with errors in July 2009. This is prejudice. However, the school tries to bridge the gap between the different LLB curriculums to a lesser extent.
Kgosietsile Tshepo Makgotlwe
20 Feb 2010 -
 
 
  Multimedia
 
 
LEAD director Nic Swart discussing the challenges facing legal education. 15.01.2010. Cameraperson: Nicholas Boyd. Editing: Darlene Creamer
 
  Photos
 
 
UNDER REVIEW
An investigation will be carried out into whether the structure of the LLB degree is adequate for the demands of the profession
 
UNDER REVIEW An investigation will be carried out into whether the structure of the LLB degree is adequate for the demands of the profession
 
 
 
  Map
 
 
Maps.
 
 
 
 
Advertisements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Related social media
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Topics on this page