We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
close notification
Date
: 06/06/2003
Source: Ministry of Water Affairs and Forestry
Title: Kasrils: Water Affairs & Forestry Dept Budget Vote
2003/2004
ADDRESS BY THE MINISTER OF WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY, MR RONNIE
KASRILS, MP, BUDGET VOTE NO. 34: WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY, 6 June
2003
"CLIMBING THE WATER LADDER"
Introduction
Last year, South Africa hosted the World Summit on Sustainable
Development, called by world leaders to ensure a prosperous future
for our people and our planet.
The World Summit gave us an opportunity to consider how we are
progressing in the few short years of democracy in improving the
quality of life of our people.
What was notable was the high regard in which South Africa is held
internationally, echoed in New York last month when South Africa
was invited to chair the United Nations Commission on Sustainable
Development, which reviews progress and follows up the decisions on
the summit.
Our environmental policies were praised, our efforts at poverty
alleviation likewise, as well as our commitment to grow our economy
and that of the African continent in a sustainable manner.
During the Summit, based on our reputation for sustainable use of
forest resources, South Africa's assistance was sought to find ways
to protect and preserve the wonderful tropical forests of Central
Africa, a natural heritage that will help to sustain us all if it
is properly managed.
But over and over again what was highlighted was the way we manage
water, the revolution in water resources management, our tremendous
success in making the right to water a reality for the many
millions who in 1994 did not have it.
It was significant that one of the largest side events at the
Summit, the WaterDome, was organised by my Department in
collaboration with African and global partners. Many delegates
commented that South Africa's tap water was not just safe but more
pleasant to drink than in many of the world's other great
cities.
And it is significant that the body responsible for turning the
decisions of the World Summit into reality, the Commission for
Sustainable Development, chaired by Minister Valli Moosa, has just
decided that water should be the main focus over the next two
years.
Our challenges
It is important to highlight these achievements, as a background
for the challenges and tasks that lie ahead. Our achievements do
not come easily for the constraints are great.
A United Nations report about world availability of water reveals
that, out of 182 countries, only 30 have less water available per
person than South Africa. Many countries that are seen as water
stressed - including neighbours Namibia and Botswana as well as
countries such as Afghanistan, Syria and Sudan have more water per
person than we do.
So we should not be surprised that this budget is presented against
a background of a drought that is hurting many rural communities in
Mpumalanga and Limpopo provinces, a drought which has contributed
to very unpleasant water quality problems across the country from
Hartebeespoort Dam to Prieska. The drought is providing a check to
see whether our water resources management and water services
provision is really sustainable in the tough conditions that we
face.
The water ladder: delivery of water services
In 1994, Government made a promise. The Reconstruction and
Development Programme, one of the most widely consulted policy
programmes in the world, committed us to the short term aim of
providing every person with enough water for health "by
establishing a national water and sanitation programme which aims
to provide all households with a clean, safe water supply of 20 -
30 litres per capita per day and adequate sanitation facilities".
We did this and so took our first steps up the country's water
ladder.
This year, we will celebrate the delivery of water to the 9
millionth person served by this Department's rural programme while
government as a whole has supplied millions more, through housing
and urban programmes, leaving between five and six million to be
served - the exact figure will be determined when the 2001 census
is released.
We have exceeded the RDP's targets!
But we are not going to be content when everyone has got onto the
first rung of that water ladder, with access to water at a tap in
the street, and sanitation.
The RDP said:
"In the medium term, the RDP aims to provide an on-site supply of
50 - 60 litres per person per day of clean water ... water supply
to nearly 100% of rural households should be achieved over the
medium term and adequate sanitation facilities should be provided
to at least 75% of rural households."
The promise for the next ten years is to move up the ladder, from
communal tap to the convenience and dignity of having water in
peoples' own yards with each household having its own toilet and
even, in time, hot and cold running water inside the house enjoyed
by many more of our people. That's what I mean by climbing the
water ladder. As we climb the ladder, so our people will experience
better and better standards of supply and services.
The water services policy review, now drawing to a close, has
considered how to move up to the next step. So we reject the
allegations of the coterie of self -proclaimed "real
revolutionaries" that government has failed on its RDP promises. On
the contrary, we have delivered them and more. And the way forward
will be outlined in the Water Services White Paper, to be published
shortly.
Service sustainability
But many people have asked whether the systems we have built are
working as we intended.
Water supply does not end when pipes are put in the ground. What
happens when a pipe bursts? When diesel must be bought for the
pump? When the operator fails to open the valves to a community?
When some people take more than their fair share of water at the
expense of others further down the pipeline?
These issues are confronted every day in communities across the
country.
For an objective view, I asked Dr David Hemson of the University of
Durban Westville who had highlighted these challenges, to
investigate a representative sample of DWAF-funded water projects
in KwaZulu-Natal.
His report did not give us 100% - I would have been surprised if it
did. His team visited 23 schemes across the province. 17 (74%) were
supplying water as intended. Only one had a technical problem -
needing a new pump. In three, there was no water because neither
community nor local government had paid for diesel or electricity.
In the last two, there was community conflict over how the scheme
should be run and who should benefit.
These findings are encouraging because, once those problems are
solved, it will be possible to get the schemes back in operation
and providing water to the communities in a sustainable way. My
appreciation to Dr Hemson for his work, which will continue. He
draws attention to many issues from the role of NGOs to compliance
with RDP standards which are most helpful.
We have also surveyed 1544 departmental schemes valued at R9.95
billion as we prepare to transfer them to local government. While
the vast majority of the schemes are working some rehabilitation is
needed, 40% because of normal ageing, 19% due to vandalism
(including theft of diesel engines, illegal connections which
caused leaks and reduced pressure, depriving whole communities of
their supplies), 18% because normal maintenance had not been
done.
The next phase of our work will therefore focus on strengthening
local management and local government. This year's budget therefore
provides not just R1.2 billion for new water supply and sanitation
infrastructure but also R116 million for refurbishment (with
another R210 million in the next two years of the MTEF), R93
million for capacity building and R25 million for strengthening our
oversight role.
Last year, when we started our policy review, I asked the people of
South Africa "what problems do you have with your water services?"
The responses confirmed that the challenge goes beyond
infrastructure with many complaints about poor service and people
not benefiting from Free Basic Water also pinpointed by Dr Hemson.
Most people had tried to engage their local municipality, without
success and were extremely frustrated. I greatly sympathise with
them and have confronted these municipalities.
Many municipalities need to improve the efficiency of their water
and sanitation services. They receive substantial grants and
municipal officials are well paid. It is therefore time to ensure
that our people get the service to which they are entitled. The
Department will therefore increasingly concentrate on its long-term
job: supporting, monitoring and regulating the way municipalities
provide water and sanitation services.
Cut-offs
It has been claimed in certain quarters that water supplies to 10
million South Africans have been cut off - one zealous Wits
Professor even suggested to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee
that the figure might be as high as 13 million. But like statements
that Government is privatising all water services, this is simply
not true. The Human Sciences Research Council, which published the
book in which the claims were made has now stated that the figure
was "a misplaced extrapolation by a researcher of an HSRC survey,
and considerably over-estimated the phenomenon".
There are lies, damn lies and statistics and there are people who
deliberately lie with statistics. "John Pape", co-author of the
book who was recently extradited to the USA to face charges related
to the so-called "Symbionese Liberation Army", glorified the use of
incorrect information. In a paper entitled "Down With Missionaries
and Objective Academics", he encouraged colleagues not to present
facts to help workers make their own decisions but rather simply to
lead them to support the desired positions and courses of action
advocated no doubt by the real revolutionaries. I have nothing
personal against the man and trust he is coping with his
incarceration but misleading working people by withholding concrete
facts or providing incorrect information is no basis for morality
nor long term political success. I trust that David McDonald his
co-author, of Queens University in Canada and the University of
Cape Town, will now retract and, like Dr Hemson, provide some
honest information that reflect what is really happening on the
ground today in a way that helps us to solve the problems.
Messrs McDonald, Cottle, Bond and company, listen up: The HSRC used
surveys and information from local government and concluded that "a
plausible estimate of the number disconnected at any point during
that period would be less than about 2% of all connected
households" but that "the extent and consequences of disconnections
by local authorities remain a serious matter of concern". I agree
wholeheartedly.
In the three largest Metros, in the first three months of this
year, 53 400 households had been cut off, typically for a short
time. This is 17 800 per month. If this is typical of all
households with metered water connections, about 250 000 people
would be cut off at any one time, including many who can pay but
"forgot". I am not happy with this number but it is far from the
crisis that the phoney revolutionaries have tried to portray.
Our policy is clear: we cannot deprive people of basic water
supplies. Where there are problems, the municipalities may restrict
flow to the free basic water level rather than cutting it off
completely. But people who use more than their free basic allowance
have to pay and if they don't, they will face restrictions. The
White Paper will clarify this and propose any amendments needed to
existing laws to ensure that everyone - from mayor to Mamas in
informal settlements - knows that water cannot be cut off
completely, save where public health is at risk.
Free Basic Water
The Free Basic Water policy announced by our President in his 2002
State of the Nation address actually goes further than the RDP,
which promised only a lifeline tariff to cover operating and
maintenance costs. 26 million people live in municipalities that
have already implemented the policy. Once again allegations by the
self-proclaimed revolutionaries that government has gone back on
its promises are as empty as a leaky bucket. Many more people will
enjoy free basic water from the 1 July, start of local government's
financial year. Given the generous increase in the Equitable Share,
I will name and shame municipalities that fail to implement Free
Basic Water.
These and other matters will be dealt with in the Water Services
White Paper, compiled by a core group including National
Departments, SALGA and the South African Association of Water
Utilities (SAAWU). It will clarify the arrangements for transfers
of schemes to local government, and for funding water investments
through the Municipal Infrastructure Grant (which I explained in
the NCOP on Tuesday).
It will also outline the future of that important family of public
service providers, the water boards, ably represented by SAAWU. And
I must congratulate Rand Water, for its hundred years as a
world-class public organisation, which continues to deliver
excellent service to the people of South Africa.
Sanitation delivery
Sanitation is now our critical challenge and delivery by the
national sanitation programme (which includes the Housing and
Municipal Infrastructure Programmes) continues to accelerate with
improved sanitation provided to an estimated 2 260 000 people last
year by Government as a whole. R221 446 000 has been spent by my
Department providing toilets for 65 105 households.
R321 million is allocated this year to provide sanitation in 120
000 households as part of the national target of 300 000 households
for the combined Programme. This will keep us on track to eradicate
the backlog by 2010. We will promote community based labour
intensive approaches that could generate over 6000 jobs annually
and put R50 million into rural economies.
The Department is also helping to eradicate the despised bucket
system. The target date for its eradication in 430 000 households
is 2006. Communities and municipalities must agree about the system
used to replace buckets, Ventilated Improved Pit Toilets (VIP's) in
rural areas or low flush water-borne systems in dense Peri-Urban
settlements. Properly built VIPs are a first class design and the
full flush systems that everyone wants will not work where not
enough water is available or the community cannot afford expanded
water supplies and waste water treatment which national government
cannot yet fund.
The Department will continue to collaborate with the Departments of
Health and Education to improve sanitation in schools and clinics.
R40 million has been allocated to my Department for clinic
sanitation programmes with R150 million allocated to the Department
of Provincial and Local Government for School Sanitation, all using
labour based approaches. The National Sanitation Task Team chaired
by my Department is helping to prioritise and identify needy
schools through the local government's planning processes.
Water Resources
Water resources management makes our water services and forestry
work possible. The National Water Resource Strategy will be
finalised for publication in the course of this year after last
year's mammoth round of consultation.
The current drought highlights the importance of managing
efficiently the water we have, both above and below the ground, and
storing it in wet years to use in dry times. Groundwater, that
hidden treasure, can be much more reliable. The Berg River project,
which will assure Cape Town's water supplies, is now underway and,
as announced in the President's State of the Nation speech, we are
also preparing to build a major dam on the Olifants River in
Limpopo to supply the rapidly expanding mining sector and meet
domestic needs. Construction to raise the Flag Boshielo dam will
increase the water available in the region in the short term.
The Lesotho Highlands Water Project is going well with Mohale Dam
nearly a quarter full. Its water will flow to the Vaal when the
tunnel is completed adding to the contribution that Katse Dam is
already making - 618 million cubic metres per year, more than half
the volume supplied by Rand Water to Gauteng.
Dams are vital to our survival but the way they are built must not
prejudice local communities as happened with the construction of
the Gariep and Inanda dams. I was shocked to learn of the arbitrary
treatment of the communities concerned by the apartheid government
of the time and told them that, while I cannot compensate them
directly for what happened, my provincial colleagues will ensure
that the shameful past is recognised when farming and housing
opportunities are allocated. And I am grateful to NGOs such as
Earthlife-Africa for working with us to support the communities
concerned.
WUA challenges
We also need to check our progress in the transformation of the
Department and of our country and indeed whether we are doing our
job as Parliamentarians. I believe we are, and the evidence for
this is the growing co-operation we are seeing between Minister and
Department and the people we serve.
As an example, the drought has highlighted the need for discipline
in the use of water and I have already reported to the NCOP on
progress we have made using the "eye in the sky" technology to curb
illegal water use. But we will never be able to be everywhere at
once. We depend on information from the ground as well.
So I am encouraged by the many people who tell us about things
happening in their areas. Often, this is not because they are
affected directly but because - like the Gauteng resident who told
me about farmers illegally building dams to take water from the
Crocodile river - they recognise that damage is being done to our
environment and to the country we are trying to build.
The role of MPs is well illustrated by the example of Hon. Dr. Jean
Benjamin who brought to my attention the disgraceful attitudes that
still prevail in some of our rural communities, reflected in the
way that workers of colour were treated by white supervisors in a
recently established water user association.
Government officials know that they have to respect the basic value
of human dignity and there have been dismissals in cases of gross
racism. But workers of Water User Associations must be treated with
the same dignity and respect that they would enjoy in government
and could expect from any other employer. I cannot go into more
detail here because some of the incidents concerned are the subject
of disciplinary proceedings but I want to assure members that I
greatly value your reports, act on them and will report back to
you. I wish to acknowledge the role of the Unions in this
respect.
My Director General will establish systematic oversight of Water
User Associations similar to that for the Water Boards, which has
enabled me to keep a close eye on developments and to intervene in
cases such as that of Umgeni Water. Problems there have been dealt
with through contract cancellations, dismissal of managers and
serious criminal charges. I have been greatly helped by information
provided to me although carefully documented, factual information
is always more useful than emotive, anonymous unsubstantiated
allegations distributed to all and sundry which has not helped the
Umgeni issue.
Forestry
The restructuring of the Department's plantation forests has
continued. All the large, Category A, plantations have either been
transferred to new operators or incorporated in SAFCOL for further
disposal. As a result, the Department's forestry trading account
has been closed.
As I told the NCOP, the Eastern Cape is an important province for
forestry. We believe that 60 000 hectares of new commercial
forestry could be added over the next 20 years, creating 3 000
direct jobs and producing an additional R150 million turnover per
annum. The Department, working with the relevant provincial
departments, will be giving a high priority this year to turning
this potential into a reality. My appreciation to my Advisor, Dr
Dennis Goldberg, for his creative energy in this regard.
I want to thank those MP's and Forestry South Africa - who pointed
out that payments are outstanding to the communities involved in
the Singisi forest project. Indeed, more than R25 million is in the
bank, awaiting the registration of the community property
associations. As a result of that information I have raised the
matter with the Minister of Agriculture and Land Affairs whose
officials are working with mine to expedite the process.
Our flagship conservation programme, Working for Water which has
now cleared a million hectares of invasive aliens plants. National
Treasury is currently reviewing how such poverty relief programmes
should be funded in future and I am hopeful that Working for Water
will continue, with a permanent budget. And I congratulate our
Ukuvuka: Operation Firestop project which has just won a Green
Trust award.
Corporate services: Audit of the department
I must mention that the Auditor-General qualified his audit of the
financial affairs of my Department last year. I have reviewed this
fully with my DG and his team. While no fraudulent or fruitless
activities were reported, some supporting documents were only
submitted after the audit, and accounting systems did not yet meet
the requirements of the PFMA. Treasury has now switched the
Department to the new BAS accounting system (although the 2002/3
accounts may still be qualified) and planning for this year's audit
allows enough time to provide the necessary records.
Africa and NEPAD
I started in New York, with the impact we have made internationally
and end in Africa where we are promoting the same water and
sanitation goals that we are achieving at home. During WSSD we
hosted the second meeting of the African Ministers Conference on
Water (AMCOW) and agreed on ways to make progress on water and
sanitation for poverty alleviation.
With our colleagues we developed an African Water Facility
proposal, a fast track fund to help other countries match the
progress that South Africa has made in water and sanitation and
welcome the positive response from the G8 meeting in Evian.
We are not seeking funds for South Africa but, in the same spirit
of solidarity that sees the better off helping the poor water user
through their tariffs; commercial farmers helping emerging farmers
to establish themselves; forestry companies investing in our rural
communities; we are fighting for equity and justice beyond our
borders as well as inside.
Conclusion
We recently laid Tata Sisulu to rest and the country reflected
deeply on the lessons we learnt from his life. Perhaps the most
important is that value of putting others before ourselves, of
service to others. This is the contract, which this government,
through in this instance, the Department of Water Affairs and
Forestry, and today's budget, has with the people of South Africa
and the Continent.
In this spirit of co-operation I recognise the private sector's
response to my challenge to forge partnerships with Roundabout
Playpump and can report a contribution of R21 million to date for
442 playpumps in rural schools.
I conclude by expressing my appreciation for the dedication of my
adviser, Dennis Goldberg, my DG Mike Muller, the Department's
hardworking officials, SAAWU, the Water Boards, the TCTA, Water
Research Commission, the National Advisory Councils for Water and
Forests, Forestry South Africa and all in the wonderful water and
forestry sectors.
June 6th, 1943, sixty years ago, saw the first opening of the
second front against Nazi Germany in the Normandy Landings.
I dedicate this speech - "the water ladder" - isitebhisi samanzi to
our assault on poverty.
Issued by Ministry of Water Affairs and Forestry
6 June 2003