The content on this page is not written by Polity.org.za, but is supplied by third parties. This content does not constitute news reporting by Polity.org.za.

Dear friends and fellow South Africans,

As the IFP approaches its Annual General Conference, rumours are rife about
the internal dynamics of the Party and the probable outcome of the
elections. The media has run with some interesting stories; mostly
inaccurate and, in some cases, wholly untrue.

I realise that South Africans are eager to know what is happening in the
IFP, as we have been a stable part of the political landscape for 35 years.
The name of the IFP is synonymous with principled leadership, integrity and
experience. And my name is almost synonymous with the IFP.

It is therefore quite understandable that journalists are allowing
themselves to be fed with leaked and unconfirmed information, as right now
anything about the IFP sells papers. We, as the leadership, have attempted
to keep our focus on resolving internal ructions, and have perhaps neglected
to keep the media up to speed.

I feel the weight of responsibility that now rests on my shoulders to set
the record straight and give our people a clearer idea of what is really
happening in the IFP.

Last week, news broke of a court application brought by a number of IFP
members to try to prevent the Party and its leadership from postponing the
Annual General Conference or declaring it to be non-elective. The
application pleaded urgency on the supposition that our Extended National
Council of this past week was set to make these declarations.

Our Secretary-General responded to media enquiries pointing out that the
application was absurd, as we had no intention of postponing the Conference
or making it non-elective. This was not on the agenda and we had no
intention of discussing the possibility.

The truth of this is evidenced by the fact that we have emerged from our
Extended National Council and the Conference is still taking place on 23 -
25 July and it is still an elective conference.

Some journalists would have us believe that this was a victory hard won by
the "Friends of VZ"; the faction that has been agitating for a change in
leadership by any means, including sabotage, deceit, brown envelope
journalism, fistfights, swearing matches and treachery.

But in truth, we are ready to hold Conference and all the work we have
accomplished thus far has been in preparation for the coming elections. Our
Extended National Council was part of this, as we sought to defuse tensions
that have been spilling over into violence, in the hope that we might secure
a peaceful Conference, without incident or disruption.

Journalists have written that there was overwhelming disagreement from
Council to making the Conference non-elective, when in fact this was never
discussed. Some have written that our National Chairperson received a
standing ovation after she spoke, which is not true. Now there are stories
being penned that we have launched disciplinary action against her; which is
another lie.

If one looks at the thread running through these lies, it is not difficult
to see what the perpetrators are hoping to achieve. It is not the media that
is lying. It is the "Friends of VZ" who are feeding lies to the media
machine to create the image of a Party that is sexist, dictatorial and on
the verge of collapse.

This is just not the truth. In 1 March 2010 the National Chairperson
published a strong statement distancing herself from the activities of the
"Friends of VZ" and rebuking those who were dividing the Party in her name.
She indicated that she would take legal action if they did not desist, and
if they continued to use her name without her permission.

As our Extended National Council discussed the problems threatening our
Party, it was clear that the divisive behaviour of the "Friends of VZ" had
continued, and still continues, to damage us. The question was raised about
why the National Chairperson had not followed up on her intention to seek
legal action against them, when their activities have so clearly caused the
IFP harm.

I myself have given the National Chairperson several opportunities to clear
her name, most recently at the provincial conference of KwaZulu Natal. But
she has always declined. It has become difficult to defend her position when
she herself will not defend it. It was therefore decided that an enquiry
should be held into this matter, to assist the National Chairperson to
clarify her position and set the record straight about her link to the
"Friends of VZ".

Matters were made worse by the fact that her own daughter was among those
who came to the gate outside our meeting and flung invectives and
vulgarities at our leadership. Many of those who align themselves with the
"Friends of VZ" are our National Chairperson's friends, relatives, former
employees and security personnel.

It would be remiss of the Party not to launch an enquiry into this matter
and, although I am not entirely comfortable with our having to do so, I
recognize the importance of settling this matter before Conference to ensure
that we do not run the risk of clashes, violence or disruption during our
elections.

The decision to launch this enquiry was based on a resolution of the
National Executive Committee and was taken in terms of section 10.9 of the
IFP's Constitution. I had reservations about this decision, as I knew that
the motives would be misunderstood. But National Council unanimously agreed
to the NEC's resolution to launch an enquiry.

The specious court application that sought to prevent us from postponing
Conference alleged that I or my "sympathizers" would attempt to "meddle" in
the election process. That is a grave insult, which shows the depth of
malice held against me by the "Friends of VZ". Their constant ploy has been
to portray this coming election as a stand-off between the National
Chairperson and the Secretary-General, as though I am simply not part of the
equation.

In terms of the IFP's Constitution, National Council must decide on the
names of candidates to present to Conference, and will be doing so at its
meeting this coming weekend.

In a resolution of 24 October 2009, National Council asked me to consider
continuing to lead the Party in order to supervise a peaceful leadership
transition. Since then, that resolution has been endorsed by the provincial
conferences of KwaZulu Natal, Mpumalanga, Gauteng and the Eastern Cape, as
well as the National Council of the Women's Brigade, the National Council of
the Youth Brigade and the Executive of Sadesmo.

This was not done at my request. I have not sought to continue leading the
Party. It is by now common knowledge that I sought to retire in 2004 and
again in 2006, but was unanimously requested by Conference to remain.

I should have decided by now what I intend to do. But the state of the Party
and the divisions sown by the "Friends of VZ" have made my decision
difficult. I shall now have to decide before or at Conference whether I am
willing to see my legacy destroyed for the sake of a "new" IFP, and whether
a "new" IFP is something South Africa needs.

In the end, the bottom line is the same as it has always been: what is best
for South Africa? What is best for my people? What is God calling me to do?
I have always seen my leadership role as God-given and a fulfillment of my
destiny. My destiny has been a part of South Africa's story. And I am not
convinced the final chapter has been written.

It is not clandestine media sources, but only time, that will tell.

Yours in the service of the nation,