Honourable Speaker; Your Excellency the President; Your Excellency the Deputy
President; Honourable Ministers; Honourable Deputy Ministers; Honourable Members

What happened last Thursday was an embarrassment to our country that should make
us deeply ashamed. The integrity of this House was torn to shreds in front of
our honoured guests, diplomats, dignitaries, and the citizens we serve; leaving
us with fundamental questions that must be answered.

Today, however, lest we fail our people again, let us focus the debate on
responding to SONA.

Last Thursday, Mr President, you quoted many numbers. Our citizens could quote
many more.

Like R300 billion; which is the loss to our economy from an unstable electricity
supply. Or R45 million; the Presidency’s unauthorised expenditure over just two
years. Or 3,2 million unemployed youth; who are frankly unimpressed by 203 000
jobs being created. What about 23 million; the number of South Africans living
below the poverty line?

There are many significant numbers we should be talking about. But today, I want
us to focus on just three: 164, 15, 40.

164 is the difference between a child born into our poorest community, and one
born into our most affluent suburb. A South African household living on the
poverty line would need to save every cent of its income for 164 years to put a
child through one of South Africa’s elite schools; a school with a laboratory, a
computer centre and a solid maths programme. 164 years.

That is the level of inequality that exists after 21 years of an ANC government.
Isn’t it time they started being honest with us?

In 1994, the ANC promised a better tomorrow. In 2015, they are still promising a
better tomorrow. But now we know that when they say “tomorrow”, they mean some
time in the next 164 years; provided that corruption disappears, the energy
infrastructure doesn’t collapse, and our economy miraculously discovers a way to
pay back the mounting debt this Government is accumulating.

I urge you, Mr President, not to ignore the meaning of the Presidential
Infrastructure Co-ordinating Commission, when it points out “bureaucratic
squabbling”, “poor planning” and “weak execution at different levels of
government”. The words, “we will not meet the manifesto target” mean simply
this: the ANC has misled the electorate.

It is not enough to say that 92 schools have been built. It’s an improvement on
the 33 built over ten years in KwaZulu Natal. But it comes nowhere near the 1000
promised in the ANC’s election manifesto. It’s nowhere near good enough.

We can commend only the strides made in fighting HIV/Aids. In this I give credit
where credit is due.

But in so many other areas, the ANC doggedly pursues bad policy. Our economy’s
“major push forward” will not come from “boosting the role of state owned
companies”. When Eskom needs another R23 billion and SAA can’t afford to fly
internationally, it’s time to stop “supporting state owned companies”. Pouring
good money after bad won’t ignite growth. Consider the UK’s example: Prime
Minister Thatcher privatised parastatals and the economy dramatically turned
around.

Instead, as one Business Day reader points out, the ANC is now inclined to
follow the Russian policy of “maskirovka”, which Stalin once confessed to
Churchill meant denial, disinformation and deceit.

164 symbolises every broken promise and every leadership failure under the ANC.

The second number I want us to focus on is 15. Fifteen is the number of months
we have left to awaken South Africa to the power and responsibility we hold in
our hands. In 15 months’ time, we will vote in Local Government Elections. This
is our chance to change who runs our municipalities and to put watchdogs in
place in municipal councils.

This is our chance to change 164, and to make “tomorrow” a day we will actually
see.

The third number is 40. There is in South Africa only one political party with
40 years of experience in governance. There is only one party that hasn’t
abandoned its founding principles or somehow changed its values over the course
of 40 years.

In March 2015, the IFP will celebrate 40 years of service to our nation, 40
years of speaking truth to power, 40 years of clean governance, and 40 years of
courageous leadership.

The way to change 164 in 15, is by looking to the 40.

In 1975 Inkatha yeNkululeko yeSizwe was founded on the liberation principles
that my uncle, Dr Pixley ka Isaka Seme, laid at the foundation of the South
African National Native Congress in 1912. The principles of equality,
inclusivity, negotiation and non-violence.

Soon a million card-carrying members of Inkatha rallied under the black, green
and gold; the colours of the liberation movement. I was raised in the ANC Youth
League and Inkatha was founded in the mould of the ANC. We shared the same goal
of freedom and the same principles.

There came a point, however, when our organisations split, for our ideologies no
longer coincided. The ANC abandoned our founding principles, engaging an armed
struggle and people’s war. In the midst of bloodshed and division, it was left
to Inkatha to continue the legacy of our original struggle.

Thus Inkatha built bridges across racial divides. I brought different peoples
together, first through the Buthelezi Commission, then the KwaZulu/Natal Indaba,
which gave us South Africa’s first non-racial, non-discriminatory government in
the KwaZulu Natal Joint Executive Authority. We proved – long before 1994 – how
governance for all, by all could be achieved.

The South African Black Alliance, which I chaired, included Africans of many
ethnic groups, Indians and Coloureds. I worked with Mr Colin Eglin, Dr van Zyl
Slabbert and Dr Zac de Beer of the Progressive Federal Party. I counted
individuals like Ms Helen Suzman and Alan Paton as friends. Even ten years into
democracy I reached out for inclusivity when I established the Coalition for
Democracy with Mr Tony Leon.

Inkatha sought to engage parties across the political spectrum, advocating
level-headed debate and genuine engagement on the issues. We did this in an
environment of firebrand rhetoric and political agitation, with the hope of
bringing solutions that every South African could embrace.

We seek to unite, not divide our nation. Forty years later, the IFP remains
committed to the founding principles of the liberation struggle. They are our
principles; principles that we never abandoned.

We look now to the state of our nation with deep concern. With increasing
political divisiveness, social anarchy, government incompetence and economic
decline, the ANC’s response is securitisation and consolidating political power.
This trajectory bodes ill for our nation.

Mr President, if the ANC returned to the founding principles of 1912, the IFP
would stand with the ANC. But while self-deception bars the ruling party from
doing what needs to be done, the IFP must stand in opposition.

We stand as custodians of the principles of our liberation struggle. We stand as
a party that seeks unity in our nation, not division; that seeks justice, not
retribution; that seeks liberty, not dependence; and stability rather than
insurrection.

Mr President, unless integrity, competence and accountability are restored to
South Africa, we remain on a dangerous path.

If I had to stand alone pointing the way to salvation, I would. But thank God, I
stand instead with millions of individuals who share my conviction that there is
a better way. I ask them to stand with the IFP.

Let us remember these numbers: 164, 15, 40. While last Thursday did not inspire
hope, there is hope for change.