Policy, Law, Economics and Politics - Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
This privately-owned website is operated and maintained by Creamer Media
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
10 February 2012
   
 
 
Article by: Sapa

The Inkatha Freedom Party is to follow other opposition parties in going to court in a bid to secure South Africans living abroad the right to vote in the upcoming election.

"The IFP will be participating in the on-going litigation aimed at challenging the constitutionality of the exclusion of South African residents abroad, from the next elections," the party's chief whip, Koos van der Merwe, announced on Thursday

"It is unconstitutional, unfair and unpatriotic to exclude any South African citizen from the electoral process at this dramatic juncture in our history," he added.

The Democratic Alliance asked the Cape High Court last month to have section 33 (1) (e) of the Electoral Act which bars expatriates from voting, declared unconstitutional.

On Monday, the Pretoria High Court is due to rule on an urgent application along the same lines by the Freedom Front Plus.

For the past decade, the Electoral Act has allowed only citizens who are abroad on holiday, business, study and international sports, to cast their ballots from outside the country.

In 1994, South Africans living abroad were allowed to vote in the country's first democratic elections, but the external vote was restricted in the next election five years later.

This remained the case in 2004, to the dismay of the opposition who claims that it disenfranchises hundreds of thousands of South Africans.

Former president FW de Klerk last month urged the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC) to interpret the law differently and allow expatriates to register for the election.

But IEC chairwoman Brigalia Bam refused, saying any confusion over the act should be resolved by Parliament or the courts.

 

 

Edited by: Sapa
 
 
 
 
  Photos
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Advertisements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Related social media
 
 
Related social media terms:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Topics on this page
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Online Publishers Association