We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
close notification
Date
: 12/04/2005
Source: Ministry of Trade and Industry
Title: Hendricks: Trade and Industry Dept Budget Vote
2005/2006
Budget Vote 32, address by the Deputy Minister of Trade and
Industry, Lindiwe Hendricks
Madam Speaker;
Cabinet Ministers and Deputy Ministers;
Members of the National Assembly;
MECs and HODs;
Officials of the dti and COTII;
Leaders of business and labour;
Distinguished guests; and,
Ladies and gentlemen
I feel honoured to present to you, alongside my Minister, the
budget of the dti for the financial year 2005/ 2006. The Minister
in his address outlined the key issues facing the department, and I
will speak to the strategic alignment within the department and
agencies so that we are able to effectively advance higher,
sustained and shared growth.
It is a mere decade ago that our country was freed from the
shackles of racial oppression and economic devastation through the
institution of a democratic government. Many had doubted that this
country would survive. The prophets of doom undermined the
resilience and determination of the South African people to succeed
and turn their birth-land into a strong and viable country.
Within a few years, South Africa was able to restructure state
organs, instil prudent fiscal and monetary policies, and ensure
macroeconomic stability. According to a report compiled by the
Bureau for Economic Research, which has been distributed here
today, the South African economy currently enjoys its sixth
calendar year of economic upswing. Real economic growth accelerated
by 5 percent during the second half of 2004 and averaged 3.7
percent for the full year. Both Statistics South Africa’s
formal non-agricultural employment series and the BER’s
business tendency survey data indicate evidence of faster
employment creation in the formal sector of the economy, which is
in sharp contrast to the job-shedding of the 1990’s. The
democratic government has done well.
The Minister has provided a very comprehensive report on how the
dti has contributed to broadening participation in the economy,
enhancing competitiveness and increasing levels of investment. The
sterling performance of government broadly, had been echoed by
equally sterling performance at departmental level. In short, Madam
Speaker, despite the challenges that remain, we can confidently say
that we have achieved much.
The credit for our success can be attributed to many factors.
Success can be attributed to our policies and programmes. Success
can be attributed to the support and bonds formed with social
partners. For me, a critical success factor is the degree to which
policy coherence and alignment is achieved within the organisation.
It is not sufficient to have good policies, programmes and
projects, with resources to ensure its implementation. Effective
programme implementation that will impact positively on the South
African economy requires a coherent understanding of what is to be
achieved, an alignment of how it is to be done and sound planning.
Better planning means better budgeting, less under-spending and a
balanced budget. Over the past year we have made significant
strides in this regard.
This, however, was not the case a few years ago. A critical
assessment of the dti in 1999 revealed an organisation that had
made considerable progress in several areas since 1994 but, which
required a more streamlined structure, greater coherence of policy
and action; better analytical capacity; and more stringent
monitoring and control. The weaknesses extended to the governance
of the many agencies and statutory bodies reporting to the dti. A
major restructuring process was therefore embarked upon.
By 2004 significant steps had been taken towards creating a
department that is able to meet the needs of a well-functioning,
modern and adaptive economy. The organisational structure was
reconfigured to enhance coherence and better implementation of the
organisation’s mandate and objectives. A marketing division
was established to enhance awareness and accessibility of the dti
products and services. A strategic planning unit was established
and a structured, formalised approach to strategic planning was
introduced.
The introduction of structured, formalised strategic planning
allowed for a greater alignment of the department’s goals and
objectives with the broader objectives of government. Activities
sought to generate outputs linked to objective-related outcomes,
and better synergy between planning and budgeting was created,
thereby improving interdepartmental coherence. The consequences of
this alignment were significant. Divisions are more accountable, as
performance reviews of selected business units and flagship
projects occur every quarter. The budget is utilised more
efficiently as it is directly linked to activities and outputs.
Significant improvements in strategic planning have led to improved
spending on the right things. From 2001/02 to 2004/5 the average
increase in the budget of the dti was 13.7 percent. The annual
average increase from 2005/6 to 2007/8 is a mere 1.1 percent.
The dti, however, is primarily a policy-making body. It is
dependent on nineteen institutions for the realisation of its
objectives. We have as part of our council of trade and industry
institutions, organisations that deal with access to finance
– these include the National Empowerment Fund, the Industrial
Development Corporation, and Khula Enterprise Finance. We also have
organisations that deal with regulatory issues – these
include the Competition Commission and Tribunal, the Gambling and
Lotteries boards, the Estate Agencies board, the Micro Finance
Regulatory Council, and the Companies and Intellectual Property
Registration Office (CIPRO). We have specialised service
institutions that deal with a range of issues and include those
dealing with Small Business Development, which is the recently
launched Small Enterprise Development Agency; institutions dealing
with quality, standards, technology and innovation, which includes
the South African Quality Institute, the South African National
Accreditation Society, the South African Bureau of Standards and
the Technology and Human Resources for Industry Programme (THIRP);
and institutions dealing with women in business, which includes the
Technology for Women in Business Programme. Finally we have
institutions dealing with trade issues, which include the
International Trade Administration Commission of South Africa
(ITAC) and the Export Credit Insurance Corporation.
These agencies consume 41 percent of the department’s budget,
and the collective asset base of these institutions exceeds R30
billion and the group employs more than 5000 people. Noting the
diverse roles of the institutions, and their high degrees of
relative autonomy, it is difficult to imagine an alignment of
programmes and activities. Yet, an alignment is essential if we are
to achieve higher, sustained and shared growth, hence the
department established an Agency Management Unit to ensure
structured coordination.
It is a pleasure to announce that the institutions reporting to the
dti have demonstrated that they are willing and eager to co-operate
with the department and comply with new processes that are being
introduced. This spirit of cooperation has been present since the
formation of the Council of Trade and Industry (COTII) Institutions
in August 2000, aimed at information sharing and the development of
a common identity; to our more recent meetings aimed at integrating
COTII institutions with the dti planning process.
For the current financial year, COTII Institutions have submitted
their strategies to the department, and the process of approving
business plans is near completion. The monitoring and evaluation
system is currently being rolled-out to include COTII and policy
coherence and programmatic alignment within the dti family is
becoming a reality. This coherence and alignment is not only
occurring between the specific institution and the department;
institutions with common mandates are also working more closely
together to ensure more efficient use of resources. To assist this
process the dti has established an impact assessment unit to
improve policy coherence and targeting of interventions.
Furthermore, the dti will also revising relevant performance
indicators, both to better assess and enhance its internal
operations and its impact on the real economy.
As announced by President Mbeki in February this year, the
compliance burden for SMMEs will be eased. The dti is working with
the Presidency and National Treasury on institutionalising
regulatory impact assessments to minimise any adverse effects of
new legislation on SMMEs. Along these lines, my department has
already established an Impact Assessment Unit that will monitor the
impact of policies and legislation on the real economy.
The search for coherence in policy and alignment of programmes,
resources and activities is an ongoing one. We are making
significant progress at a departmental level and this progress is
being translated into tangible results in respect of delivery. The
system however is not flawless, but regular meetings, monitoring
and evaluation assist us in addressing any flaws.
What is certain, is that all our institutions, many of them are
present here today, share a common vision for the economy; which is
to create an adaptive and restructured economy characterised by
growth, employment and equity, based on the full potential of all
people, communities and geographic areas by the year 2014. And a
shared vision provides a solid platform for tighter
cooperation.
To conclude I would like to thank the Minister for the leadership
and vision he has given the dti. I would also like to thank the
outgoing director-general Alistair Ruiters who has left a legacy of
the new dti campus, a restructured department, and improved systems
of co-ordination. I would also like to recognise the leadership of
the Council of Trade and Industry Institutions, you are the drivers
of our microeconomic reform strategy, and it is good to know that
the citizens of this country are receiving support from such
capable people. Finally I would like to thank members of the
Portfolio and Select Committees, for your advice and support.
Members, we table Vote 32 before you for endorsement.
Issued by: Ministry of Trade and Industry
12 April 2005