We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
close notification
Date
: 21/05/2003
Source: SA Parliament
Title: Ginwala: Presentation of Human Security Commission's report
to Mbeki
SPEECH BY SPEAKER OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY, DR FRENE GINWALA, AT
THE PRESENTATION OF THE HUMAN SECURITY REPORT TO PRESIDENT MBEKI,
Cape Town, 21 May 2003
President Mbeki
Deputy President,
Honourable Ministers
Excellencies,
Colleagues
On behalf of the Chairpersons and Members of the Commission on
Human Security, I thank you for joining us at this launch in Africa
of our report: Human Security Now.
You will recall, Mr President, that during his visit to South
Africa, Prime Minister Mori of Japan spoke of the global imperative
of meeting the need for human security, and his intention to
facilitate the appointment of a commission to explore and define
the concept and help to formulate an appropriate response from the
international community. Stimulated by a similar concern and
challenge raised by the United Nations Secretary-General at the
Millennium Summit to address freedom from fear and freedom from
want, the Independent Commission on Human Security was launched as
an initiative supported by the Japanese government and the United
Nations Secretary-General. Co-chaired by Mrs Ogata and Prof Amartya
Sen, the Commission brought together the experience and expertise
of leading advocates on conflict resolution and social justice.
Global events over the ensuing years have highlighted the crucial
importance of this task for sustainable peace and development. Our
report was presented to Secretary-General Kofi Annan on 1 May.
Today we submit the report to you, President Mbeki, as the current
Head of the African Union, and as President of South Africa.
The co-chairpersons of the Commission, Mrs Sadako Ogata, a former
UN High Commissioner for Refugees, and Professor Amartya Sen, a
Nobel Economics Laureate, apologise for not being with us today.
However, we have received a recorded message from Mrs Ogata.
The different experiences and perspectives within the Commission
coalesced into a common understanding and acknowledgement of a need
for a shift from a traditional and cold war focus on concern for
security of the state, to a holistic people centred concept.
It was personally gratifying to note the extent to which the
anti-colonial and liberation struggles in Africa have contributed
to reshaping concepts of security as well as the influence of the
women's movement in helping to establish the linkage and
interdependence of achieving the international objectives of peace,
equality, stability, justice and development.
Two broad areas of research and related consultative processes
informed the Commission's deliberations. One area dealt with human
insecurities resulting from conflict and violence, and the other
with the links between human security and development. The ultimate
aim was to integrate the two and arrive at an all-encompassing
concept.
The project commissioned research, undertook field-based
assessments of specific themes and organised a series of events in
collaboration with the UNHCR, UNDP and other partners.
Consultations, outreach and collaborative arrangements were
important to the success of the project. The Commission has held
five general meetings. Workshops took place in Sweden, Thailand,
Costa Rica, Turkmenistan, Rwanda and Benin. Public hearings on
human security were convened at the occasion of the World Summit on
Sustainable Development in Johannesburg and; the Africa Institute
of South Africa organised an Africa-wide civil society consultative
meeting in Pretoria. The findings and outcomes of these events have
significantly informed the work of the Commission.
Of particular interest from the outreach activities was the
confirmation that while one could with confidence refer to threats
to human security in developed and relatively affluent societies,
in Africa and elsewhere one needed to recognise that people were
not living in a state of security, but rather in conditions of
chronic insecurity, which our co-chairperson Amartya Sen describes
as the "adversity of persistent insecurity of those whom the growth
process leaves behind".
The continued marginalisation of countries in Africa from processes
of economic growth and development, have reinforced perceptions of
exclusion and vulnerability.
Development, poverty eradication, social equality, conflict
resolution, peace building and state building in Africa are all
part of a continuum and are interdependent. If we fail in one we
enter a downward spiral.
States ought not to be the sole or main referent of security.
People's interests or the interests of humanity, as a collective,
become the focus. In this way, security becomes an all-encompassing
condition in which individual citizens live in freedom, peace and
safety and participate fully in the process of governance.
Eradication of poverty as well as effective responses to new risks
and vulnerabilities related to infectious diseases, increasing
trans-national crime among others is central to ensuring the
security of all people, as well as the security of the state.
The Commission calls for a comprehensive understanding of human
security that requires the creation of systems that give people the
building blocks of survival, dignity and livelihood. It requires
protecting people from critical and evasive threats and situations,
building on their strengths and aspirations.
This understanding of human security does not replace the security
of the state with the security of people. It sees the two aspects
as mutually reinforcing.
Security between states remains a necessary condition for the
security of people, but national security is not sufficient to
guarantee peoples' security. For that, the state must provide
various protections to its citizens and must protect vital
freedoms.
Individuals also require protection from the arbitrary power of the
state, through the rule of law and emphasis on civil and political
rights as well as socio-economic rights.
The report is launched at a time when global insecurities are
arguably more acute then ever. Politically this is exemplified by
the unilateral actions in Iraq, and new risks such as the SARS
epidemic.
In response to the threat of terrorism regrettably some states have
reverted to a narrower understanding of security and the
credibility and legitimacy of multilateral institutions is being
eroded. The United Nations remains as the best option available to
preserve international peace and stability as well as to protect
people.
We need an institutional system of external oversight and
decision-making that states voluntarily subscribe to. Nobody has a
monopoly on being right (particularly when defending one's own
interests), and the assertion of unilateral rights of action
inevitably leads to conflicting claims by others. A renewed
commitment to multilateralism is crucial for the future of human
security.
Fortunately there are renewed initiatives focusing on regional and
continental cooperation and regeneration. A convergence in how we
understand issues of security and how we view the effects on the
lives of people is already evident in the founding documents of the
African Union, the New Partnership for Africa's Development, the
Conference on Security, Stability, Development and Cooperation in
Africa, and the reformed Southern African Development Community,
including its Organ on Politics, Defence and Security as well as
the new Peace & Security Council. This report can assist in
deepening the debates and moving us forward to ensure the
protection and empowerment of people.
The Commission has dealt in detail with only some of the areas that
will contribute to comprehensive human security, and in these we
make a range of policy recommendations. These illustrate the need
to use an integrated, rather than sectoral approach to policy
making.
Inevitably such an approach will impact on each of the institutions
of National, Continental and International governance, which will
require adaptation and change. At this early stage in the
development of the African Union and NEPAD it poses both a
challenge and an opportunity for all countries in Africa.
As Mrs Ogata has stated, human security requires the inclusion of
the excluded. It focuses on the widest possible range of people
having enough confidence in their future-enough confidence that
they can actually think about the next day, the next week, and the
next year.
That confidence must reside in and be responded to, by our leaders
and the African Union.