Policy, Law, Economics and Politics - Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
This privately-owned website is operated and maintained by Creamer Media
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
25 May 2013
   
 
 

“The submarine SAS Queen Modjadji’s accident with the seabed speaks of negligence and poor training. To allege that an investigation has to be instituted into safety measures is to mislead the public as if this was the problem. The reality is that there are existing safety measures and that the submarine has sufficient instrumentation which warns when the submarine is too close to the seabed. The commanding officer of the submarine should take the responsibility and disciplinary steps should be instituted,” Mr. Pieter Groenewald, the FF Plus’ chief spokesperson on Defence and Military Veterans says.

“The incident is reminiscent of the Lohatla case where anti-aircraft canon killed a number of soldiers. The blame was placed on other aspects except who was responsible for the negligence. A submarine costs taxpayers billions of rand and is not a motor vehicle which can receive a few dents to train the driver. Drastic action should be taken against the responsible person,” Groenewald said.

Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter
 
 
 
 
  Photos
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Advertisements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Related social media
 
Related social media terms:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Topics on this page
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Online Publishers Association