Policy, Law, Economics and Politics - Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
This privately-owned website is operated and maintained by Creamer Media
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
24 May 2013
   
 
 
 
DOWNLOAD
 

[1] The applicants approached this Court by way of urgency in terms of Rule 6(12) of the Uniform Court Rules of the High Court of South Africa, seeking an order as follows:

"1. Enrolling the application as an urgent application condoning the Applicants' non- compliance with the forms and service provided for in the rules of court, to the extent necessary;

2. Declaring that the failure of the First to Seventh Respondents to provide access to effective/ reliable potable water for more than seven full days, as prescribed by regulations 3(b) of the regulations relating to compulsory national standards and measures to conserve water (GN 509 in GG 22355 (8 June 2001)) to the residents of Silobela. Caropark and Carolina Town in Carolina, Mpumalanga, is unlawful;

3. Directing the First to Seventh Respondents to provide temporary potable water in line with regulations 3(b) of the regulations relating to compulsory national standards and measures to conserve water (GN 509 in GG 22355 (8

June 2001)) to the residents of Silobela, Caropark and Carolina Town in Carolina, Mpumalanga within 24 hours of the order of this court,

Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter
 
 
 
 
  Photos
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Advertisements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Related social media
 
Related social media terms:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Topics on this page
 
 
 
City
 
Continent
 
Facility
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Online Publishers Association