We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
close notification
Date
: 24/05/2005
Source: Department of Public Enterprises
Title: Erwin: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor Supplier Conference
Opening address by the Honourable Minister of Public Enterprises,
Mr Alec Erwin, at the PBMR Supplier Conference
Programme Director
Executive Mayor, City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality, Mr
Father Smangaliso Mkatshwa, Chairman Pebble Bed Modular Reactor
(PBMR), Dr Alistair Ruiters
Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer, Westinghouse
Electric Company, USA and PBMR Board Member, Dr Regis Matzie
Vice-Chancellor, North West University,
Potchefstroom, Dr Theuns Eloff
Chief Executive Officer, PBMR, Mr Jaco Kriek
Chief Executive Officer, Eskom, Mr Thulani Gcabashe
Honoured Guests
Ladies and Gentlemen
Introduction
I would like to begin by welcoming our visitors to South Africa.
Let me assure you that the weather is always like this even during
our winter – although in all honesty it can be a bit
different in Cape Town. The holding of a supplier conference on the
Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR) is a milestone in the development
of this crucial technology.
There maybe some among you who are a little surprised that a
country of South Africa’s size is undertaking a project that
is of global significance. I am sure that by the end of this
Conference you will have come to know the unusual history of this
project’s location in South Africa, but even more important,
you will have come to understand that South Africa is in an
exceptionally strong position to be able to undertake this
project.
It is interesting to remember that the real work on the PBMR
started in 1994 so in a sense it is one of the fruits of our new
democracy. What is in no doubt is that the successful completion of
the project will make a great contribution to the building of our
economy and the future prosperity of our democracy.
So in having the privilege of opening this Conference I hope that
we will use it as an ideal opportunity to reflect back on our
achievements over the past 11 years, to network, interact with
local and overseas suppliers and chart a way forward. Two of my
colleagues, the Ministers of Trade and Industry and Minerals and
Energy, will also address you on key aspects of the project. Our
Deputy President will join us tomorrow night. She has played a key
role in the sustaining of this project over the last six years and
we are honoured that she will find the time to address you and be
able to interact with us. I believe the support of government for
the project is very evident as lining up this number of Ministers
for one occasion is not easy.
One of South Africa’s economic and industrial strengths is
the quantity and efficiency of its electricity supplies. However,
like all economies in the world today we face challenges. Almost 90
percent of South Africa’s electricity is generated in
coal-fired power stations. Koeberg, a large nuclear station, which
is near Cape Town, provides about five percent of capacity. A
further five percent is provided by hydro-electric and pumped
storage schemes. In South Africa, there are few, if any, new
economic hydro sites that could be developed to deliver significant
amounts of power. The country’s natural gas resources at this
stage would seem to be too limited to qualify as a viable option
for power generation.
With sustained economic growth over the last decade we now face key
challenges. Firstly, we are reaching the limits of our capacity and
are now commencing a major new build programme. Secondly, we have
to diversify our energy sources. We are planning a major
construction programme to generate some 20000 mw over the next 20
years that will address these two challenges. The first phase of
this programme – the rehabilitation of three mothballed
stations has already commenced. Bidders for two gas-fired stations
have also just been qualified. The introduction of the PBMR could
not have come at a more economically opportune time. Its positive
attributes from an environmental point of view and its potential
link with hydrogen production add immensely to the attractiveness
of this technology.
A key component of the future energy system that we had to consider
was nuclear energy – as a major producer of uranium it would
have been surprising if South Africa did not investigate this
option. In addition South Africa did have scientific capacity in
this field. Government in conjunction with Eskom, the Industrial
Development Corporation and British Nuclear Fuels have applied very
considerable resources to investigating the pebble bed technology
as part of its Integrated Electricity Planning process. The
investigation, which included technical performance evaluation and
economic merits of the project, has strongly supported the PBMR
technology as a component of the future electricity supply in South
Africa. The pre-feasibility studies conducted showed considerable
technical and commercial merit for the PBMR as future base load
energy in South Africa.
In 2004, Government signalled its intention by allocating funds to
the PBMR project. The funding enables the PBMR to secure strategic
contracts for the development of key components such as the turbine
machinery (being developed by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries from
Japan) and a Helium Test Facility (HTF) at Pelindaba. Government
wants to produce between 4 000 MW to 5 000 MW of power from pebble
bed reactors in South Africa. This equates to between 20 and 30
PBMR reactors of 165 MW each. The project is now factored into our
future energy planning from about 2010 onwards. We firmly believe
that the PBMR will place the country at the forefront of energy
technology.
The Minister of Trade and Industry will deal more fully with
Government’s overall approach to the implementation of the
project and its impact on industrialisation in South Africa, which
we see to be very positive. South Africa is a modern, cost
competitive economy capable of advanced manufacturing activity.
This will provide a favourable economic environment for the
realisation of the pilot plant and the subsequent industrialisation
of the PBMR.
The project is now at a full-scale engineering design phase. This
means that the demand for technical disciplines such as civil,
mechanical, electrical, construction, chemical, instrumentation and
control, mining and computer technology is growing and providing a
host of opportunities for investment and training. In March 2005,
PBMR (Pty) Ltd and the Chinese developers of pebble bed technology,
Chinergy Co of Beijing, signed a Memorandum of Understanding. The
objective of the MoU was to pursue potential benefits, which could
be realised through co-operation for the High Temperature Reactor
(HTR) demonstration projects in China and South Africa.
Benefits of the co-operation agreement can be summarised as
follows:
* Promotion of technology transfer with key international
suppliers
* Establishment of joint ventures between local and overseas
companies
* Creating new trading partners
* Accessing Foreign Direct Investment and * Critical skills
development.
We are moving rapidly toward the construction of a pilot plant at
Koeberg. If this is successful then we will factor the PBMR into
the new generation capacity for South Africa. The energy model that
we are constructing facilitates the introduction of the PBMR in a
manner that impacts positively on all aspects – the emergence
of the new capacity, the sustainability and security of the system
and the competitiveness of electricity prices.
The model rests on the use of Eskom as the anchor for the system
whilst allowing IPP into the system. There is little doubt that
such progress in industrialising the PBMR will mean that we can
commercialise it on an international scale. As indicated before we
will have also achieved an environmentally sound diversification of
our energy sources and will be able to develop in the realm of the
hydrogen economy of the future.
The African continent is currently engaged in a renewal process
through the establishment of the New Partnership for Africa’s
Development (NEPAD) and the African Union (AU). The over-arching
objective of the renewal process is to overcome poverty,
underdevelopment and political instability.
The development of the African continent is imminent and offers
major opportunities. However, energy sources are currently
underdeveloped. The PBMR has three advantages. These advantages are
very important to the developing economies in the world and
therefore very important for African development.
The first is that its modular form is very appropriate for
economies that now have very high cost energy but where the economy
cannot finance very large generation plants. The introduction of
the modules will strengthen electricity generation, allow for
industrialisation and as growth occurs so the financial resources
for larger generation plants will be acquired. Very large plants
maybe attractive for the developed economies and for the giant
economies but for Africa as it develops they are not an attractive
option. South Africa’s well-developed grid and the
introduction of the PBMR into this grid will provide Africa with an
abundance of expertise in developing their own grids based on a
combination of smaller and larger generation plants. The second
attraction is that the PBMR technology offers a nuclear generation
source that is inherently safe. This deals with one of the historic
concerns around nuclear energy.
Thirdly, the PBMR will reduce dangerous emissions. In addition the
waste issue is very manageable. Nuclear wastes exist in small,
highly manageable amounts that can be stored without harm to people
or the environment.
Conclusion
In South Africa we are on the road to development and a prosperous
future. I believe that the PBMR supplier conference provides an
occasion for many industrial enterprises to join us in this
journey. I hope that you are able to shape broad strategic views
about what we want to achieve collectively, create a dialogue,
share experiences, debate issues, enter into intensive discussions
and learn from each other. I wish you all the best and will now let
the real work of the Conference commence.
Thank you.
Issued by: Department of Public Enterprises
24 August 2005