Policy, Law, Economics and Politics - Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
This privately-owned website is operated and maintained by Creamer Media
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
24 May 2012
   
 
 

The current leadership of the NPA should remember, before it contemplates suspending Adv. Glynnis Breytenbach, that it is accountable to Parliament under section 35 of the NPA Act on all its powers, functions and duties, including decisions regarding the institution of prosecutions. The Democratic Alliance (DA) will want answers regarding the suspension with which Adv. Breytenbach is threatened as well as the NPA’s handling of the cases thought to have triggered the threat of suspension.

The cases thought to be at issue include fraud charges against Imperial Crown Trading (ICT). It is probable that the alleged fraud relates to the falsification of application documents submitted by politically connected ICT for prospecting rights. There were counterallegations at the time by the Department of Mineral Resources that Kumba submitted its application under fraudulent dates. Kumba was found by Judge Zondo to hold 100% of all mining and mineral rights. ICT’s application documents included sections visibly copied from Kumba’s application.

The Sunday Times reported today that Adv. Menzi Simelane, in his last month in office before the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled his appointment invalid, met with ICT’s lawyers and took Adv. Breytenbach off the case. It also quotes Hawks papers filed in court which identify associates of the Gupta family and of Deputy President Kgalema Mothlanthe as being “responsible” for the alleged fraud.

The cases at issue are also thought to include the provisional withdrawal of fraud and corruption charges against former crime intelligence head Richard Mdluli in December last year.

Adv Breytenbach is attached to the Special Commercial Crimes Unit. A second set of charges – for murder and attempted murder – against Mr Mdluli has just been withdrawn pending an inquest. The DA will want answers to the question as to why no prosecution of Mr Mdluli seems to be taken to conclusion.

South Africans are sick of corruption. Adv. Breytenbach strikes us as a highly effective prosecutor in the fight against corruption. However, if we have a National Prosecuting Authority that bends to politically connected pressure, then this fight will unfortunately be lost.


 

Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter
 
 
 
 
  Photos
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Advertisements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Related social media
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Topics on this page
 
 
 
Company
 
Industry Term
 
Person
 
Published Medium
 
 
 
 
 
 
LABOUR LAW MANAGEMENT CONSULTING
 
 
 
 
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
 
 
 
 
 
 
Online Publishers Association