The Afrikanerbond and the Freedom Front Plus raised concerns over the public hearings on Gauteng name changes on Thursday, which appear not to have been advertised.

The Afrikanerbond suggested that the outcome had been predetermined.

"This was confirmed by the chairperson of the provincial portfolio committee which stated that the 'transformation' of place names has been decided by the ANC at its national conference and is now implemented by government. Therefore this public consultation process is under suspicion," said spokesperson Jan Bosman.

They also felt that the struggle history of the African National Congress (ANC) would be recognised as being the only real history of South Africa, and that any minority group would not be acknowledged.

They would nevertheless put their proposals to the committee for consideration and discuss the matter further with the ANC leadership.

Freedom Front Plus MPL Jaco Mulder said that he only became aware of the hearings on Wednesday afternoon and was surprised he had not been informed because of his position in the legislature.

"I am a member of the Gauteng legislature and we never received an invitation," he said, adding that if he had known about it he would have sent someone to contribute.

He has already complained to Arts and Culture MEC Nelisiwe Moerane and has suggested that she expand the hearings as the Birchwood Hotel in Kempton Park was also not an ideal venue.

On Friday lobby group Afriforum will be in the Pretoria High Court to oppose the change of name of Pretoria to Tshwane.

Earlier, in a speech prepared for delivery, Moerane explained the significance of standardising names and restoring many place names to their original spelling.

She said that some people thought that changing names was whimsical and wasteful, but explained that standardisation had many practical benefits. It would also go towards righting the actions of early settlers and colonial powers who ignored historical and cultural heritage when changing a place name.

The hearings follow an instruction from Cabinet that the department of arts and culture, through the SA Geographical Names Council, consult the public on name changes.

The matter is also covered in the United Nations Guidelines on the Standardisation of Geographical Names and forms part of a UN resolution. The resolution includes the avoidance of more than one name for one feature, the elimination of objectionable names and the avoidance of repetition of names.

"Apart from the fact that place names identify and reflect culture, heritage and languages, the correct use of place names has practical benefits to local, national and international communities in areas of trade and commerce, population censuses and national statistics.

"Urban and regional planning, search and rescue missions, map and atlas production, automatic aviation and navigation and communications, including postal and news services."

It would be difficult to distribute food for example in a war torn country, or during a natural disaster if a town is known by different names.

Older names were "lost in the mists of time" and this part of Africa was "littered" with name changes that reflect its turbulent past.