Policy, Law, Economics and Politics - Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
This privately-owned website is operated and maintained by Creamer Media
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
26 May 2013
   
 
 

The Competition Commission (Commission) has filed an application to appeal the Competition Appeal Court's (CAC) judgment in the Pannar Seed (Proprietary) Limited (Pannar Seed) and Pioneer Hi-Bred International Incorporated (Pioneer) merger with the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA). The Commission is challenging the CAC's judgment on two grounds, namely the approval of the merger and the costs order awarded against the Commission.

As discussed in our newsletter of 7 June 2012, in May 2011 the CAC overturned the Commission's prohibition of the merger between Pannar Seed and Pioneer. The CAC held that the proposed transaction would benefit competition in the industry by preventing the inevitable demise of Pannar Seed.

A spokesperson for the Commission indicated that the organisation is seeking clarity from the SCA as to when the "failing firm" defence may be used in merger transactions. The spokesperson also stated that an order for the Commission to pay legal costs, incurred in the Competition Tribunal (Tribunal) and SCA reviews, undermines its investigatory powers.

Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter
 
 
 
 
  Photos
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Advertisements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Related social media
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Topics on this page
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Online Publishers Association