Policy, Law, Economics and Politics - Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
This privately-owned website is operated and maintained by Creamer Media
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
25 May 2013
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
DOWNLOAD
BMW South Africa (Pty) Ltd v National Consumer Commission and Another (NCT/2679/2011/101(1)(P), NCT/2807/2011/101(1)(P), NCT/2806/2011/101(1)(P)) [2012] ZANCT 13 - 334.8 KB
 

BACKGROUND

On 13 August 2008, Mr. Rogers purchased a BMW Z4 Coupe from Club Motors in Randburg. On 03 May 2011 Mr. Rogers filed a complaint with the Commission in terms of Section 71 of the CPA, alleging that BMW has acted in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of the CPA.

 

On 23 August 2011 the Commission issued a compliance notice in terms of Section 100 of the CPA to BMW. BMW objected to this compliance notice on 13 September 2011 (“the Rogers Compliance Notice”).

On 12 January 2011, Mr. Bonn purchased a BMW 135i Coupe from JSN Motors. On 05 May 2011 Mr. Bonn filed a complaint with the Commission in terms of Section 71 of the CPA, alleging that BMW and JSN have acted in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of the CPA.
 

Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter
 
 
 
 
  Photos
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Advertisements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Related social media
 
Related social media terms:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Topics on this page
 
 
 
Company
 
Club Motors
JSN Motors
Person
 
bonn
Product
 
BMW 135i Coupe
BMW Z4 Coupe
 
 
 
 
 
 
Online Publishers Association