Following the outbreak of civil war in South Sudan at the end of 2013, the UN Security Council passed a resolution that substantially restructured the form and function of the UN mission in South Sudan (UNMISS). This signalled a departure from its previous state-building activities to prioritise the protection of civilians. Despite the restructuring of its mandate, UNMISS finds itself between a rock and a hard place. There is no way to extricate the mission without compromising the safety of both UN personnel and civilians. This paper argues that the current mandate and operations are vulnerable to challenge by spoilers. It recommends robust UN engagement towards a peace agreement that commits the transitional government to a comprehensive process of disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration of combatants. This should also lead to a comprehensive reform of the security sector.

About the authors:

Mark Malan is employed by the New Zealand Defence Force as a teaching fellow at Massey University’s Centre for Defence and Security Studies. Previous roles include leadership of peacekeeping research and training programmes at Refugees International, the Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Training Centre and the Institute for Security Studies.

Dr Charles T Hunt is a lecturer in international security and a research fellow with the Asia-Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to Protect, at the School of Political Science and International Studies, University of Queensland, Australia. His recent publications include UN peace operations and international policing: Negotiating complexity, assessing impact and learning to learn (Routledge, 2014).

This paper is published as part of the Institute for Security Studies’ Training for Peace Programme. The ISS is grateful for support from the following members of the ISS Partnership Forum: the governments of Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and the USA.