We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
close notification
Date: 15/06/2004
Source: Ministry of Correctional Services
Title: N Balfour: Correctional Services Dept Budget Vote
2004/2005
BUDGET VOTE ADDRESS IN THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY BY MR BMN (NGCONDE)
BALFOUR, MP, MINISTER OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, 15 June 2004
Madam Speaker, Cabinet Colleagues
Honourable Members
In addressing this august House this morning, I have a confession
to make. I am a convert of corrections.
Like so many of our people who have experienced the devastating
impact of crime and violence in their daily lives, I was not averse
to the view that incarceration and imprisonment is the only way to
rid society of such scourges. I was sympathetic to the argument
that if you do crime, you do time behind high walls, insulating
society against everything that prisons represent. Lock them away
and do not open the cell doors until they have repaid their debt to
society, or even throw the key away, is a common response.
Perhaps through this approach, we have some sense of security,
albeit false. Perhaps our desire for retribution is satisfied.
Perhaps if we place them behind high walls, we can wipe them out of
our memories. As I have indicated, I had sympathy for those who
reasoned like this. That is, until I entered the East London
Correctional Centre last week.
What awaited me behind those high walls was something that I cannot
and will not cast from memory. It reaffirmed the commitment that I
made when I was appointed to this position by President Thabo Mbeki
to make a difference in the lives of both perpetrators and victims
of crime and violence. I am convinced that correction and
rehabilitation is the only way in which we are going to insulate
society against the cycle of crime. No high walls will do this. It
is only a conversion on the part of all of us to embracing and
promoting the correcting of offending behaviour that will bring
about a positive change in the cycle of crime that we have to
endure.
I entered what could have been a nursery, except it was a prison
cell. I addressed a group of about 150 boys neatly clad in red
tracksuits at what could have been the opening ceremony of a school
sports tournament, except it was the courtyard of a prison. I held
in my arms a set of twins born in prison in August last year. They
have never had the right of being free or the right of interacting
with their families except with their mother who is an offender.
Those ten-month old babies appear to have no chance in life. They
already start their lives with a disadvantage. They are behind high
walls, away from being able to prick our consciences as human
beings. With them are 12 other babies, most of who have never had
any contact with a male person before, including their
fathers?
Those boys in their tracksuits could potentially represent South
Africa at the 2010 Soccer World Cup. It is from their ranks that
our future leaders, businesspeople and sports stars should come.
Instead, they are imprisoned for crimes committed.
I accept that we cannot simply open the doors to them. The mothers
of those babies and those young boys must pay their debt to
society.
But surely, Honourable Members, we can open our minds. With Youth
Day being celebrated tomorrow in the 10th year of democracy and
freedom, let us open our minds to avenues that we can pursue to
ensure that no young person is excluded from the opportunity to
serve society in a socially responsible manner. I am not asking
Honourable Members and law-abiding South Africans to compromise on
crime. Instead, I am pleading for a mind-shift in our approach to
dealing with offenders. At Correctional Services, we are committed
to playing our part in the transformation of the broad criminal
justice system that includes the correction and development of
especially our youth.
As Government, we have made major strides in the past 10 years in
the transformation of policing and the prosecutorial and judicial
system. In his State of the Nation Address, President Mbeki
committed government to intensifying this transformation. The
objective of taking into custody the top 200 criminals is part of
this process. At Correctional Services, we will ensure that we play
our part in this regard. Those criminals must know that we are
ready to accommodate them not only in our facilities when
apprehended but also in our programmes aimed at assisting them in
changing their offending behaviour and ultimately reintegrating
them into society. But they must also be warned - if they refuse to
change their lives, we will keep them removed from society, even
permanently, if necessary.
At the same time, we must acknowledge that the transformation of
the correctional system in this country did not initially receive
the attention that it warranted. There are numerous reasons for
this, amongst them being that we focused on safe custody to the
exclusion of almost everything else.
However, Government has put in place through the approval in
October last year of a Draft White Paper on Corrections, a
framework that will steer transformation of the correctional system
and delivery on rehabilitation in the coming decade of democracy.
The basis laid in the Draft White Paper takes us in a new direction
in relation to correctional management, and will enable the
Department to contribute fully to the achievement of social crime
prevention and effective integrated criminal justice in our
democracy.
To my predecessor, Honourable Ben Skosana, and Correctional
Officials under the guidance of Commissioner Mti, I want to
acknowledge that you have provided a firm foundation on which to
push ahead with the transformation of the Department and the
correctional system. It is now imperative that we advance this
process in line with our strategic plans for the years 2004/2005 to
2006/2007. As part of the Justice, Crime Prevention and Security
Cluster, we are committed to the successful implementation of an
integrated and coordinated programme of action that will deliver on
the security priorities as outlined in the State of the Nation
Address.
The seriousness of the challenges of restructuring the penal system
that are outlined in the Draft White Paper requires a firm
commitment to ongoing transformation of the correctional service
over a 15-20 year period. As the ANC, we are steadfast in that
commitment that includes a criminal justice system based on a
common understanding of crime combating, crime prevention and
rehabilitation. It is in this context that the Department will
operate and as the responsible Minister who derives my mandate from
the Election Manifesto of the ANC endorsed by more than 70 percent
of our people, I make this commitment to a radical transformation
of the correctional system. I invite you, Honourable Members, to
join me in this commitment to the people of South Africa.
The imperatives from which we derive our mandate at Correctional
Services - being the Constitution, the White Paper, the
Correctional Services Act 111 of 1998, its Regulations, Policies
and Procedures - create the space for concentrated delivery. We
have opted to develop best practice in the implementation of the
White Paper through establishing Centres of Excellence in each
region. In these Centres (initially, we envisage 24 selected
institutions as Centres of Excellence) we will be able to put into
practice the needs-based corrections, development and care
programmes that are implicit in the White Paper. We are currently
processing a costing of the White Paper Implementation Plan, which
I will be taking to Cabinet during the next quarter and this will
be followed with a Policy Conference to align existing policies
with it.
The White Paper calls for a profound commitment by South Africans
to create the conditions in which the correctional system is solely
challenged with the care and correction of those who require
focused attention of professional correctional officials and those
who require to be corrected outside of the mainstream of society.
Crime prevention and rehabilitation require a social compact
between government and civil society, and as such, I believe that
we need to mobilise our communities around issues of social
cohesion, social justice, moral and ethical values, and
socio-economic development.
Correction is indeed not merely a mandate of the Department
responsible for running the correctional centres and community
corrections offices. Correction is a societal responsibility of all
institutions and individuals, starting with the family, schools,
community organisations, and sports bodies as well as religious and
cultural institutions. As Government, we believe that correction,
both as self-correction and correction of others, is inherent in
good citizenship.
Correctional Services is tasked to place rehabilitation at the
centre of all of its activities, but the challenge of social
reintegration of offenders into their families and communities, is
not achievable without such partnerships. Of course, the burning
question is who forges these partnerships? Do we leave it up to
individuals or NGOs? Or do we leave it up to structures created by
the State or Parliament?
It is a shared responsibility, with community outreach programmes
driven by Correctional Services within the JCPS Cluster being one
avenue that must be explored in the implementation phase of the
Centres of Excellence. There is a tremendous amount of anger within
our communities directed at inmates. At various times, this anger
is also directed at Government with accusations that offenders have
more rights than victims of crime; that offenders are provided with
free board and lodging including three meals a day that millions of
other law-abiding South Africans do not have access to. There is
the argument that offenders forfeit their human rights and
protection under the Constitution once they have been found guilty
of crimes and there is often also the perception that offenders
remain contemptuous of the rule of law.
It remains the responsibility of Correctional Services to convince
the public through our actions that offenders sentenced by the
courts, come to prison as punishment, not FOR punishment and
further, that correction and rehabilitation do not translate into
treating offenders with kid gloves. On the contrary, correction and
rehabilitation are aimed at protecting the safety and security of
the public. It serves no purpose to release angry young people into
society who have had no benefit of correction and rehabilitation.
All we do is to provide them with an excuse to unleash even further
hardships on our communities through repeat offending.
It is former President Nelson Mandela, in his autobiography, Long
Walk to Freedom, who describes Robben Island as 'the
University'.
"Robben Island was known as 'the University' because of what we
learned from each other," he writes. "We became our own faculty,
with our own professors, our own curriculum, our own courses. Our
university grew up partly out of necessity," Madiba adds.
This was a university of political struggle where our leaders
prepared themselves to govern. Their jailers had no answer to
dealing with people who were not prepared to remain idle during
their incarceration.
If we, in 2004, prefer to take the same route as our leaders'
jailers did under apartheid by allowing offenders to remain idle,
we create an environment in which a University of another kind
would flourish. Only this time it is Universities of Crime that are
unleashed on our communities upon their release. Their faculty is
the faculty of crime, their professors are the manipulative
offenders who use coercion, corruption, abuse, intimidation and
blackmail to recruit receptive students of crime, and their
curriculum and courses are aimed at further corrupting young
offenders. Surely, that is not what we seek. Surely, we can
distinguish between those who can be described as incorrigible and
those who are in need of correction and rehabilitation. While I
will not use the iron fist in giving effect to the core business of
Correctional Services, I will also not hesitate to protect society
against those offenders who refuse to be rehabilitated.
In this regard, a review of our policy of intervention programmes
is needed. I am not convinced that programmes of rehabilitation
should be voluntary, especially for young offenders and juveniles.
I am looking at this policy with the view of making such
interventions compulsory. Of course, this would have to be subject
to various considerations, including budgetary implications and I
regard this as part of our overall transformation plan. In the
short to medium term, it could become part of the implementation
framework in the Centres of Excellence that we have
identified.
Since 17 May, I have been to three of the six regions of
Correctional Services, visiting a number of facilities. I addressed
more than 1 250 members of Correctional Services and met the senior
staff in all the Management Areas that I visited. I have also
engaged a number of offenders from C Max in Pretoria to juvenile
sections at St Albans. The Deputy Minister and I have also had
extensive briefings with the Commissioner and his team. South
Africans must know that there are too many young people - children
under 18 years and young adults - in our prisons. There are 4 158
children under 18 years in detention, of whom 2 232 are
un-sentenced, six of whom are under 14; and 1 926 of whom are
sentenced with nine of them being under 14.
We have 26 781 un-sentenced 18-25-year-old youths in our facilities
as of 30 April 2004, only 475 of whom are women. We have a further
46 291 sentenced youths of whom only 764 are women. That means 73
072 men and women in the prime of their youth are in our
facilities.
Some may indeed be there due to the lack of alternative facilities
for children awaiting trial, a process that the JCPS Cluster is
addressing with the Department of Social Development. Some may be
there because of the still inadequately streamlined criminal
justice system and lack of legal representation. Others are there
because they have been charged with and sentenced for heinous
crimes, made more appalling by the fact that such violent crimes
are committed by young people. In many cases, they have been failed
by their families and society in general.
Madam Speaker,
As I have stated earlier, tomorrow is our 10th Youth Day. It is an
important day for the nation, not just for the Department, to make
the commitment to ensure that in ten years time, we do not have
such a preponderance of young people in our prisons. These people
should be at the stage of their lives where they are spreading
their wings and learning to fly, testing their abilities on the
sports fields, on the stages of our country, in our work places.
Instead, their circumstances, their family situations and the
socio-economic situation have combined to make them test their
wings in crime.
It is our challenge as Government, in giving effect to a People's
Contract with the nation, to focus our attention on job creation,
on arts, culture, sport and recreation development, on literacy and
education, on instilling in our youth a love of the Constitution
and the Bill of Rights.
Within the Department, I commit myself, the Deputy Minister,
Commissioner Mti and the staff to ensure that our resources are
prioritised towards correction and development of the youth, and in
particular first offence youth. It is the youth to whom we have the
highest moral obligation to correct their offending behaviour, but
it is also the youth who with the provision of appropriate
correction and development programmes and the appropriate social
and economic circumstances, have the best chance of full
rehabilitation and social reintegration. As the African idiom says,
Bagotywa bebatsha".
The impact of rehabilitation programmes is well-illustrated by the
42 young offenders from the Western Cape who were honoured at the
Gold Award Ceremony of the President's Award for Youth Empowerment
in Grahamstown last week.
It is also in the interests of our nation that we encourage the use
of appropriate alternative sentencing options within the criminal
justice system. Moreover, the Department must enhance service
delivery to parolees and probationers in order to prevent
recidivism, which has an impact on expenditure. The challenge that
faces the Department in relation to community corrections is to
enhance the rehabilitation, correction and development aspects of
correctional supervision in order for it to be seen as a viable
alternative sentencing option.
As we proceed with the transformation of the correctional system,
we need the criminal justice system to be responsive to the greater
capacity for rehabilitation and correction that will emerge in the
Department. This must inform the approach that we develop to
sentencing and to releasing offenders on parole, both of which must
be focused on furthering the correction of the offending behaviour
of the sentenced offender.
Only when we measure the readiness of offenders to retain or return
to their place in the community on the basis of the work they have
personally done to correct and change their behaviour and learn
social responsibility, will we as a nation have adopted the
appropriate approach to criminal justice. The dualistic paradigm of
crime and punishment alone cannot achieve a nation free of crime
and at peace with itself. The belief that human beings deserve
opportunities to repay society for wrongs they have committed and a
second chance to claim their place as good citizens must inform our
approach to criminal justice. In this sense, the penal reform
envisaged in the White Paper is an integral component of the
criminal justice review that Cabinet initiated in 2003/2004, and
must be premised on cooperation and coordination within the JCPS
departments. There already exists a high degree of cooperation
within the JCPS Cluster and it is my belief that the challenge of
overcrowding in our facilities is best addressed with a
multi-pronged strategy to be determined within this Cluster.
The budget allocation to our department for the 2004/2005 financial
year amounts to R 8,407 billion and will provide for an overall
establishment of 35 197 personnel and for supervision of an average
prison population of 187 000 prisoners and 72 000 probationers and
parolees. The growth in the Vote reflects the appointment of an
additional 1 955 officials between April 2004 and March 2006, as
well as the increased allocation to fund additional offender
accommodation space and for a higher projected offender
population.
Expenditure on compensation of employees is expected to consume an
average of 63,9 per cent of the Vote over the medium term, while
payment for capital assets, which includes building of new prisons
by the department and all the payments to the private prison
contractors, should consume an average of 14,7 per cent, mainly
because of the increased allocation to payments for
capitalization.
From 2000/2001 to 2006/2007 expenditure on supplies would have
grown by an average of 10,6 per cent to accommodate the higher
projected offender population compared to the annual average budget
increase over the same period of 9,9 per cent. Other current
expenditure reflecting an increase in operational costs associated
with growing offender numbers amount to R1, 7 billion in 2004/2005,
and are expected to rise by an annual average of 7,9 per cent to
R1, 9 billion in 2006/2007.
Additional allocations, including inflation adjustment, amount to
R102, 6 million in 2004/2005, R116, 2 million in 2005/2006 and
R125, 5 million in 2006/2007 for constituting and implementing
Remission and Parole Boards and financing the higher projected
offender population. It is envisaged that recruitment of staff for
Parole Boards will start in July while training will get underway
in August.
Included in the budget allocation is compensation of employees
expenditure which amounts to R 5,36 billion for personnel salaries,
allowances and bonuses. Over the medium term this category of
expenditure continues to dominate, due to the personnel-intensive
nature of incarceration and rehabilitation as well as associated
overtime expenditure for staffing correctional facilities. An
additional allocation of R100 million in 2005/2006 will provide
staff for new correctional centres and for the related day-to-day
operating costs of their activities.
The budget also provides for an amount of R 111,589 million for the
purchase of departmental equipment and R1, 143 billion for capital
works projects of which R194, 731 million provides for the fixed
portion of the Public Private Partnerships prisons. This allocation
includes new capital projects, maintenance and professional
fees.
The total MTEF allocation for capital works projects, with
allocations of R914, 162 million, R982, 950 million, R1, 007
billion respectively for the 2004/2005 to 2006/2007 financial
years, provides for the building of four new prisons and which will
be commissioned in the 2005/2006 financial year.
Costing the implementation of the White Paper, in consultation with
the Treasury, will enable us to submit for approval any budget
estimate challenges and cost drivers that will result from its
implementation.
In reviewing our budget allocation, we are faced with a number of
challenges relating to remuneration and service conditions. I
recognise and acknowledge that our members work under stressful
conditions given the nature of their work. Those at the coalface of
security, correction and care within our facilities are potentially
exposed to risk not only with regard to the management of offenders
but also related to possible corruptive influences. During the new
quarter, I will be submitting a presentation to Cabinet dealing
with remuneration and service conditions. Through this, we will
address critical shortages of professional staff needed to give
effect to correction and rehabilitation. We are failing to attract
and retain much-needed professionals simply because we offer
non-competitive and unattractive remuneration packages. I will also
address overtime remuneration that has become unsustainable. If we
claim that we are committed to building a People's Contract to
create work and fight poverty, then Correctional Services will have
to re-assess its overtime establishment and find a mechanism that
will contribute to job creation within our current budget. I want
to give notice here today that a Task Team involving DCS, DPSA and
National Treasury has finalised its research and submitted
recommendations on how the weekly establishment of the Department
could be structured to ensure efficient delivery of services.
Obviously, this will be discussed with all stakeholders active
within Correctional Services. I have given a public undertaking
that I am open to all viewpoints but this will always be informed
by my mandate to use limited resources in the most cost-effective
manner without putting at stake the personal interests of our
members. I fully appreciate the concerns of members relating to
parity in salaries, medical-aid contributions and benefits and
other issues such as career advancement. These are, after all,
matters pertinent to contributing towards pride in the workplace
and job satisfaction. But I will not be held to ransom by those
taking an anarchist approach to dealing with these matters. Those
making themselves guilty of indiscipline, illegal actions and the
disruption of essential services, will have to bear the
consequences of their actions. There is absolutely no valid reason
why structures agreed upon to deal with communication and
negotiations should be ignored in favour of confrontation. If there
are those who believe that their interests are better served
through confrontation, then Correctional Services is too small a
place to accommodate those elements and myself as the responsible
Minister. I have been given a five-year mandate by the President
and the ANC to deliver on the needs of Correctional Services. I
have no intention of volunteering an earlier departure. That leaves
those seeking confrontation with no option but to seek alternatives
where their obstructionist views will be tolerated.
Madam Speaker,
The slogan "Every Member is a Rehabilitator" requires the
Department to have a corporate culture and identity, that lives up
to our Vision. Our Mission also places rehabilitation at the centre
of all our activities in partnership with external stakeholders.
This will be central during my term of office and I extend an
invitation to all South Africans to join hands with us as we strive
to remain true to our Mission.
It is true that many who work in the Department do not see
themselves as service providers. The transformation of the
Department must entail addressing improved service delivery by our
officials, who must fully understand that their function is to
provide services to the offenders, their families and friends. They
must understand that the Batho Pele principles are as applicable to
them as to the rest of the public service. We need conscious front
line workers in the Department who understand their function to
provide information to the families, the community and to inmates.
In this regard, we are considering the implementation of service
delivery excellence awards nationally, through which members would
be judged by their peers and honoured accordingly.
Cabinet has also endorsed the need for a specific Departmental
corporate identity that enables all members to identify themselves
with the collective that DSC is. It also provides members with a
guide as to their respective positions within the collective.
Uniform and insignia are a reflection of the mutual respect that is
expected from our members and of the hierarchical nature of any
correctional system. With that common identity, must be discipline
and respect. Indiscipline by one member reflects on the entire
organisation. I, supported by the Deputy Minister and the
Commissioner, am committed to instilling in the DCS a strong sense
of personal and organisational discipline. We need to be earning
the respect of the communities that we serve and live in. We need
to be turning around the public perception that we are an
organisation fraught with indiscipline, corruption and lack of work
ethic. I expect members to acknowledge that our own behaviour will
dictate how the public perceives us as well as what we can expect
from those offenders placed in our care. More importantly, DCS must
have a performance-driven culture, in which service delivery by
members are measured in critical areas such as a reduction in the
levels of escapes; the improvement of literacy amongst offenders;
the upgrading of the safety of offenders; better health and
nutrition of inmates; and improved human rights practices.
I have already met with Judge Jali, the Inspecting Judge, POPCRU
and SAPHOR. I want to publicly confirm my and the Department's
commitment to continue supporting the work of the Jali Commission
as they enter the final leg of their mammoth task. Let it be said
that DCS has already benefited both from the Interim Reports of the
Jali Commission and the investigations of the Special Investigative
Unit (SIU). We will pursue all avenues in bringing identified
culprits to book and those, who through their silence become fellow
conspirators, must know that guilt resides as much with them as
with the wrong-doers.
I am well aware of the limited timeframe that I have to ensure the
cleansing of DCS of corruption and bad management. We are
processing the 11 Interim Reports of the Jali Commission and the
eight reports of the SIU. Over and above that, we are establishing
an internal investigative and code enforcement capacity. Ongoing
work on corruption prevention is required by management to
undermine the inherent tendency towards corruption. As it currently
stands, our Disciplinary Code and Procedure has not had the desired
effect of curbing corruption. Loopholes are being exploited,
resulting in long, drawn-out hearings and a rise in litigation. I
will insist that criminal proceedings must be instituted where
prima facie evidence of corruption exists. I am currently studying
a proposed revised Disciplinary Code and Procedure that would
hopefully contribute towards dealing with the menace of
corruption.
Madam Speaker,
In concluding, I would like to acknowledge the Chairperson of the
National Council on Correctional Services, Judge Desai; the
Inspecting Judge, Judge Fagan; Mr Modisenyane, the Chairperson of
the Ad Hoc Committee on Correctional Services; and Nkosi Mokuena,
the Chairperson of the Select Committee on Constitutional and
Security Affairs; and to invite them to join with me in ensuring
that the Department lives up to its Vision and Mission.
The Department is committed to a cleansed, trained and dedicated
management; the consolidation of relations between managers and
their staff in order to form the team necessary to deliver on
rehabilitation; an enhanced ability to immediately investigate,
prosecute and deliver appropriate sanction to any allegation of
corruption; and the delivery of our core services.
In relation to Offender Care, the planned HIV/AIDS Prevalence and
Attitude Survey is a key priority for 2004/2005. Our Development
Programme will concentrate resources on literacy, education; skills
development and recreation and sport as part of rehabilitation. The
priority areas in relation to security are to ensure that the
escape trend moves downwards, and that the safety of offenders is
improved, in particular through an anti-rape strategy within our
facilities.
The challenge of transforming an institution as big and complex as
Correctional Services, is immense but one that I relish. There will
be no holy cows and untouchables. There will be no excusing
ineptitude, failure to comply with policies and instructions,
neglect of duties, corruptive practices and collusion with
offenders. Correctional Services is in need of a major shake-up and
it has begun. Every member is most welcome to join in our crusade
for fresh impetus in our Correctional Services collective. There
will be no easy victories, but every corrupt official exposed,
every escape stymied, every offender rehabilitated and reintegrated
into society and every member satisfied with his or her work
conditions will be a step in the direction where we can with
candour and humility state that we serve with pride.
I thank you.
Enquiries: Graham Abrahams
Tel: (021) 462 2314/5/6
Fax: 021 465 4375
Cell: 082 453 2244
Issued by: Ministry of Correctional Services
15 June 2004