We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
close notification
The
furore around South Africa's multi-billion rand arms deal burst
to the surface again yesterday with opposition parties calling for
a renewed investigation into the deal.
This followed a report in Business Day newspaper, which said the
government's final report on the arms procurement deal was heavily
edited, and left out findings on gifts received by key players in
the controversial deal.
The final report, handed over to Parliament last year, also omitted
"inaccuracies" in a defence department presentation to Parliament's
public accounts committee (Scopa), the newspaper said.
Former Scopa chairman Dr Gavin Woods of the Inkatha Freedom Party,
who was at the forefront of original calls for a probe into the
deal, along with former African National Congress MP Andrew
Feinstein and others, said yesterday one of the biggest challenges
had been to ensure an "honest and expert investigation" into the
deal.
"Opposed by hostile members of the Cabinet and blocked, undermined
and abused by internal parliamentary forces, we failed to have the
facts of the deal revealed.
"The official investigation facilitated by the auditor
general(Shauket Fakie) played a significant part in this failure,"
he said.
"We now begin to access information which the AG has long sought to
keep from the public and Parliament, and from this we begin to
confirm much of what we have long suspected - that the
inappropriate associations between the AG and members of the
Cabinet... during the course of the investigation, gave scope to
the grossly misleading and evasive report which was
produced".
As further sections of the original draft report and other emerging
evidence became available, the real levels of irregularity, which
pervaded the deal and cost taxpayers' many extra billions of rands,
would become clear.
"As such, members of the executive, the Speaker, the ANC Whippery,
and ANC members of Scopa will have much to answer for," Woods
said.
Democratic Alliance finance spokeswoman, Raenette Taljaard, called
on Fakie to release the comprehensive draft of the joint
investigation team's (JIT) report immediately, and to reveal the
extent to which Parliament had been misled.
In a substantive motion to be tabled in the National Assembly
yesterday, she also called on Speaker Dr Frene Ginwala to order an
immediate debate on the issue and take the strongest possible
action against any official or public office bearer who had misled
the House.
United Democratic Movement leader Bantu Holomisa called for a full
judicial commission of inquiry into the entire arms deal
process.
"The extent to which Parliament has been misled during the arms
deal investigation is now coming to light," he said in a
statement.
However, Sipho Ngwema, spokesman for the National Directorate of
Public Prosecutions (NDPP), which was part of the JIT with the AG
and Public Prosecutor, said yesterday the Scorpions special
investigating unit had yet to complete its probe into certain
aspects of the deal.
Ngwema said the directorate had no comment at this stage, as it was
still following-up on certain issues.
Long after the final report had been handed over, the directorate
was still subpoenaing people and probing matters.
These investigations were still continuing, he said.
According to Business Day, the new information emerged in draft
reports released last week to C2I2 electronics company managing
director Richard Young, one of the losing bidders in the
deal.
Earlier this year, Young won a court action forcing Fakie to give
him documents relating to the investigation into the deal.
The newspaper reported that Fakie said on Tuesday there were good
reasons for not including some items in the final report. He also
denied the changes were made at the behest of senior members of
government.
He was not unduly pressurised to remove any part of the report, nor
was it improper to exclude from the final report what at first
glance appeared to be evidence of corruption.
The three short paragraphs in the gifts-received section did not
specifically conclude that prima facie evidence of corruption was
found, Fakie said.
Business Day said an "infuriated" Young had instructed his legal
team to formulate charges of perjury, contempt of court, defeating
the ends of justice, and offences in terms of the Promotion of
Access to Information Act against Fakie.
Young was not immediately available for further comment yesterday.
– Sapa.