CHAPTER SEVEN

 

Implementing the Green Paper

The Ministry is well aware that the proposals presented in the Green Paper are ambitious. At the same time, the Constitutional imperative, to ensure the progressive extension of further education to all, and the case for restructuring outlined in previous chapters, make change inescapable and immediate action necessary. This chapter briefly describes the structures and activities that the Department of Education will establish and initiate. Of primary importance is the establishment of a Transformation Steering Committee and four Task Teams focusing on the development of management capacity, information systems, funding, and programmes and qualifications.

 

1. A strategy for implementation

Transformation of FET will not take place overnight. The challenges are substantial and resources limited. Yet the country faces immediate and pressing needs, for instance in addressing the situation of the marginalised and unemployed. Developing our human resources to meet the demands and opportunities of the future cannot be postponed. The key question accordingly is not whether to begin the process of transformation, but how to begin in the right place.

In beginning to implement such a strategy, it is important, first, to match the capacity of government and the FET system to the roles assigned to them, and second, to begin to build capacity at the system and institutional levels. This implies that implementation of a co-ordinated approach to the transformation of FET will need to take place in phases, as the necessary mechanisms and processes are put in place, and as the necessary capacity is developed.

1.1 Capacity building

Transformation of FET and the implementation of a co-ordinated approach to provision will require the development of capacity at the national, provincial and institutional levels. Key capacity building initiatives will need to be focused on:

1.1.1 Developing management capacity

Co-ordination and planning, as well as the need to promote flexibility and responsiveness, will place new demands upon FET leadership and management at the national, provincial and institutional levels. Targeted initiatives will be needed to:

The private sector, aid agencies, NGOs and other organisations will have an important role to play in supporting these efforts to adapt to new challenges and opportunities.

1.1.2 Developing information systems

The new FET system proposed in this Green Paper will require the development of management, planning and information systems at the national, provincial and institutional levels. It will be an important task of the NBFET to advise on the design of these systems, and a key task of the DoE to guide their development.

1.1.3 Developing the infrastructure

In addition to building leadership and management capacity, and developing effective information and administrative systems, attention will need to be given to enhancing the physical infrastructure, in particular, as regards the availability of up-to-date, networked information technologies. Links will need to be established between the DoE and the DoL information systems and with the management information systems of FET colleges. Attention will also need to be given to sharing, upgrading and modernising equipment and physical plant.

1.1.4 Phased implementation

The Ministry believes that the establishment of a national policy framework for the transformation and development of FET is a pressing national concern. At the same time, it recognises that the introduction of a new planning, regulatory, funding and curriculum framework needs to occur in a responsible manner, bearing in mind the limited institutional and systemic capacities and resource constraints that characterise the present state of development. Accordingly, the Ministry will show flexibility in the way in which it introduces a co-ordinated national system. The Ministry envisages that the full introduction of the new system will take place over a five- to ten-year period.

 

2. Time frames for change

2.1 Restructuring of the FET system will entail two time frames. First, processes that will lead to the White Paper and new Further Education and Training Act. Second, a number of activities, which can begin now and may continue after the promulgation of the FET Act, will be initiated in parallel with the legislative process.

2.2 Specific actions which the Ministry will undertake without delay include:

 

3. Task Teams

The Ministry proposes to establish four Task Teams to begin to lay the groundwork for transformation. The Task Teams will include representatives of the national and provincial Departments of Education, the social partners and stakeholders, and individuals from outside the Departments of Education who have relevant expertise and experience.

A capacity audit, which will be conducted by the DoE and which is currently in the planning stages, will provide valuable baseline data and information for the transformation process.

3.1 Task Team on management capacity development

Implementation of the new governance, planning and funding frameworks requires strengthened management capacity at the national, provincial and institutional levels. The range of developmental tasks, which could be undertaken in collaboration with the new Education Management Development Institute, includes:

3.2 Task Team on information systems

Tasks to be undertaken in collaboration with the Information Systems and Policy Support Directorates of the DoE will include:

3.3 Task Team on funding

Tasks to be undertaken in collaboration with the DoE and the HEDCOM sub-committee on Finance will include:

3.4 Task Team on programmes and qualifications

Tasks to be undertaken will include:

 

4. Transformation Steering Committee

In many areas the Task Teams will need to work closely together to ensure that their separate proposals are coherent and compatible and that they form a comprehensive and practicable package. A Transformation Steering Committee will be established to co-ordinate the efforts of these four Task Teams.

 

5. Piloting planning and funding

5.1 Introduction of the new planning and funding system will require developmental work, field testing and dry-runs of procedures and funding formulae, and the demonstration of institutional capacity before financial and other powers can be delegated. This will be undertaken over a period of years.

5.2 The Ministry is determined that the new funding system, in particular, will be introduced in a planned and responsible way. New programme-based funding norms need to be developed and tested, and the capacity of institutions to manage their finances must be rigorously assessed. The Ministry foresees that `dry runs' of the funding cycle will precede the implementation of the new system. These will provide opportunities to assess the robustness of the funding formulae, and will enable institutions to develop the necessary internal systems and controls, and managerial capacities, without their having to assume full responsibility for their actual budgets.

5.3 The planning system will be introduced in tandem with the new funding system. Guidelines for institutional strategic planning will be developed by the management Task Team. The DoE, in consultation with the NBFET, will develop initial national objectives and targets, and the provincial Departments of Education will translate these into provincial strategies. Thereafter, one or more planning dry runs will take place, accompanied by `shadow' budgets.

5.4 The delegation of financial and planning authority will be rigorously overseen and monitored by the DoE, in consultation with the NBFET, provincial advisory bodies and the provincial Departments of Education. Each institution will be required to pass an independent professional audit of its management systems and controls and its readiness to receive and manage public funds before it is allowed to assume full operational responsibility.

 

6. Next steps

6.1 In the second phase of implementation, budgetary authority and strategic planning responsibilities will be progressively delegated as institutions demonstrate the required capacity.

6.2 Not all institutions will be brought into the new system on the same date. At the point when an institution has an approved plan and has passed a financial audit, the provincial Department of Education will formalise via a written agreement the terms and conditions under which the institution may determine its mission and strategic plans and utilise public funds.

 

7. Implementation of FET transformation

The  following diagram depicts the implementation process in graphic form. 

Department of Education initial implementation plan for FET transformation

FET WHITE PAPER and LEGISLATION
FET BILL and REGULATIONS IN TERMS OF THE NATIONAL EDUCATION POLICY ACT
  • CREATE NBFET
  • DELEGATE AUTONOMY; CREATE PLANNING AND FUNDING FRAMEWORK
TRANSFORMATION STEERING COMMITTEE
  • PURPOSE TO DIRECT AND CO-ORDINATE TASK TEAMS
  • MEMBERSHIP -  NATIONAL, PROVINCIAL, PROVIDER REPS & EXPERTS
CAPACITY AUDIT
TASK TEAMS - MEMBERSHIP: NATIONAL, PROVINCIAL, PROVIDER REPS & EXPERTS
MANAGEMENT CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT FUNDING LEARNING PROGRAMMES and QUALIFICATIONS INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Develop guidelines for:
  • strategic planning and funding
  • human resources and MIS
  • plant management

Organise forums and workshops on new FET

Advise on staffing and training needs to national & provincial education departments

Organise and oversee professional development activities for national and provincial levels

Develop institution accreditation criteria and preparation plans for autonomy

Develop detailed methodologies and systems for programme-based funding

Outline the transitional arrangements - parallel systems

Develop funding formula

Develop FET programme tariff regulations and process

Model institutional allocations

Advise on the implementation of the new funding system

Advise on financial reporting and accountability procedures

Develop a single curriculum and qualification framework for senior secondary school education and FET college education at the FET band.

Develop for medium-term curriculum and qualifications framework consistent with goals and phase-in of Curriculum 2005.

Identify programmes eligible for funding

Identify qualifications and part qualifications

Identify curriculum contents and funding implications for programme tariff

Clarify FET qualifications to access higher education

Liaise with DoL regarding learnerships and labour market programmes

Assess relevance of programmes to learner needs

Assess value of programmes to labour market & employers

Determine data elements & reports for:
  • institution
  • education depts
  • NBFET

Advise on IT systems to process, share & compare data & information

Liaise with DoL on labour market data

INSTITUTIONAL and STAFF DEVELOPMENT:
  • Partnerships FET Institutions with Industry/Employer/Community ¯Staff Training & Development
  • Management Development
PHASED DEVOLUTION OF GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY
STRATEGIC PLANNING FINANCIAL PLANNING HUMAN RESOURCE PLANNING
  • "Dry Runs" of planning and funding cycles
  • ACCREDITATION & CAPABILITY AUDIT plus APPROVED PLAN leading to WRITTEN AGREEMENT of CONDITIONS of PHASED DEVOLUTION OF GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY

 

What this chapter means in practice

A White Paper together with draft legislation will be produced, following public responses to this Green Paper. It is anticipated that the White Paper and Bill will be released during the current calendar year.

The NBFET will be established by regulations under the National Education Policy Act, 1996.

A Transformation Steering Committee will be established to direct and co-ordinate the activities of four Task Teams. The Task Teams will focus on management capacity development, information systems, funding, programmes and qualifications.

A capacity audit will be undertaken to provide baseline data for the Task Teams.

Stakeholder initiatives involving partnerships and the training of staff will be encouraged.

The groundwork for the phased devolution of governance and management responsibility will be undertaken through pilot initiatives and the implementation of dry runs of the funding cycle and the strategic planning process. 

 

 

Appendices


Acronyms and abbreviations

ABET Adult Basic Education and Training
CEM Council of Education Ministers
CHE Council on Higher Education
DoE Department of Education
DoL Department of Labour
ETD Education, training and development
ETQA Education and Training Quality Assurance Body
FET Further Education and Training
FETC Further Education and Training Certificate
FETQA Further Education and Training Quality Assurance Body
FTE Full Time Equivalent
GET General Education and Training
HE Higher Education
HEDCOM Heads of Education Department Committee
HEQC Higher Education Quality Committee
HRD Human Resource Development
IDC Inter-departmental Committee
ITB Industrial Training Board
MEC Member of the Executive Council
MTEF Medium Term Expenditure Framework
NBFET National Board for Further Education and Training
NCFE National Committee on Further Education and Training
NCHE National Commission on Higher Education
NETC National Education and Training Council
NGO Non-Governmental Organisation
NQF National Qualifications Framework
NSA National Skills Authority
NSB National Standards Body
NSF National Skills Fund
SAQA South African Qualifications Authority
SETA Sectoral Education and Training Authority
SGB Standards Generating Body

 

 

Definition of concepts

The following definitions attempt to clarify concepts which are referred to in this document:

Access the provision of entry points at appropriate levels of education and training for all prospective learners in a way which facilitates progression
Accreditation a procedure by which an authoritative body gives formal recognition that an institute, body or person is competent in terms of a specific purpose
Accrediting body the authority that is acknowledged as having the right to grant accreditation to an institution of higher learning and/or vocational training, programme of study or service
Assessment the process of collecting and interpreting evidence of learner achievement
Assessment criteria the criteria included in a unit standard designed to determine the achievement of specific and essential outcomes
Competence the capacity for continuing performance within specified ranges and contexts resulting from the integration of a number of specific outcomes. The recognition of competence in this sense could be the award of a credit towards a qualification or the award of a qualification
Constitution the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (Act 108 of 1996)
Core the compulsory learning required for a particular qualification
Credit the recognition by an accredited body that a learner has satisifed the outcomes of a unit of learning expressed as a credit value at a specified level. Credits may be accumulated until conditions have been met for the award of a qualification
Critical cross-field outcomes broad cross-curricular outcomes that focus on the capacity to apply knowledge, skills and attitudes in an integrated way
Curriculum framework the philosophical and organisational framework for a specific curriculum
Elective a selection of additional credits at a specified level to ensure that the purpose of the qualification is achieved
Evaluation the process whereby the information obtained through assessment is interpreted to make judgements about a learner's competence
Field of learning an area of learning used as an organising mechanism for the National Qualifications Framework (NQF)
Flexibility the facility of the qualifications system to meet the needs of learners, providers, industry and service sectors
Fundamental learning which forms the grounding or basis needed to undertake the education, training or further learning required in the obtaining of a qualification
Globalisation the increasing intensification of world-wide social and economic relations which link the distant places and communities in a network of interdependence and interactions such that local happenings are shaped by remote events, and world affairs are conversely affected by things that occur in local, national or regional contexts
Instructional offering the basic component from which a subject is developed, containing specific content which has been selected and structured for a specific level
Integrated assessment a form of assessment which permits the learner to demonstrate applied competence and which uses a range of formative and summative assessment methods
Learning programmes relevant unit standards as well as possible learning materials and methodology by means of which learners can achieve agreed learning outcomes
Levels the positions on the NQF where national unit standards are registered and/or qualifications awarded. These levels are arranged to signal increasing complexity in learning and to facilitate meaningful progression routes along career and learning pathways
Moderation the process of sampling and comparing assessment to ensure that Education, Training and Development (ETD) practitioners are assessing work according to agreed standards, and that there is consistency from year to year, and within districts, provinces and nationally. At higher levels international consistency is also sought
National Qualifications Framework (NQF) the Framework approved by the Minister of Education for the registration of national standards and qualifications
National Standards Body (NSB) a body responsible for establishing education and training standards or qualifications, to which specific functions relating to the registration of national standards and qualifications have been assigned
Outcomes segments of unit standards which are statements of the required learner capabilities that must be demonstrated. Outcomes are specified by stated performances and assessment and range criteria
Performance criteria criteria against which the achievement of specific outcomes by the learner may be assessed
Phases stages distinguished within general, compulsory education in order to accommodate the various learning needs of children at different stages of development
Portability the condition of transferability and recognition of credits between providers and employers
Qualification a planned combination of learning outcomes which has a defined purpose and which is intended to provide qualifying learners with applied competence and a basis for further learning
Quality Assurance Body a body accredited by SAQA for the purpose of monitoring and auditing achievements in terms of national standards and qualifications, and to which specific functions relating to the monitoring and auditing of national standards and qualifications have been assigned
Recognition of Prior Learning the granting of credit for a unit of learning on the basis of an assessment of formal and non-formal learning and/or experience to establish whether the learner possesses the capabilities specified in the outcome statement
Specialisation the specialised theoretical knowledge which underpins application in the area of specialisation
Specific outcomes contextually demonstrated knowledge, skills and attitudes, reflecting essential outcomes
Standard Generating Bodies (SGB) a body responsible for establishing education and training standards or qualifications, and to which specific functions relating to the establishing of national standards and qualifications have been assigned 
Standard setting the process of identifying the pertinent task, knowledge and/or skills within an occupation, profession, trade and sub-speciality, and establishing the required achievement levels in performance of those tasks
Unit standards nationally agreed and internationally comparable statements of outcomes and their associated performance/assessment criteria together with administrative and other necessary information. Unit standards are registered on the NQF at a defined level

 

Contents | Chapter1 | Chapter 2 | Chapter 3 | Chapter 4
Chapter 5 | Chapter 6 | Chapter 7 | Appendicies