https://www.polity.org.za
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Case Law / All Case Law RSS ← Back
Africa
Africa
africa
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Article Enquiry

Democratic Alliance and Another v Public Protector of South Africa and Others (CCT 251/22; CCT 252/22 ;CCT 299/22 ;CCT 251/22 ;CCT 252/22; CCT 299/22) [2023] ZACC 25

Close

Embed Video

Democratic Alliance and Another v Public Protector of South Africa and Others (CCT 251/22; CCT 252/22 ;CCT 299/22 ;CCT 251/22 ;CCT 252/22; CCT 299/22) [2023] ZACC 25

Legal gavel

14th July 2023

ARTICLE ENQUIRY      SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

  • Democratic Alliance and Another v Public Protector of South Africa and Others (CCT 251/22; CCT 252/22 ;CCT 299/22 ;CCT 251/22 ;CCT 252/22; CCT 299/22) [2023] ZACC 25
    Download
    0.85 MB
Sponsored by

1.         The appeals by the Democratic Alliance (DA) and the President of the Republic of South Africa in CCT 251/22 and CCT 252/22 against the orders in paragraphs 187.5 and 187.6 of the Full Court’s judgment delivered on 9 September 2022 (Part B judgment) are upheld.

2.         The conditional application for confirmation of the said orders of invalidity is dismissed.

Advertisement

3.         The orders of the Full Court in paragraphs 187.5 and 187.6 of the Part B judgment are set aside and replaced with the following order:

“The prayers in paragraphs 3.2, 3.3 and 4 of the amended Notice of Motion to declare the decision to suspend the applicant issued on 9 June 2022 and the decision of the Section 194 Committee to commence the section 194 removal process to be irrational, unconstitutional and invalid and set aside in terms of section 172(1)(f) of the Constitution are dismissed.”

Advertisement

4.         The appeals by the DA and the President in CCT 251/22 and CCT 252/22 against the costs order in paragraph 187.7 of the Part B judgment are dismissed.

5.         The Public Protector’s conditional cross-appeals in CCT 251/22 and CCT 252/22 are dismissed.

6.         The Public Protector’s application for leave to appeal in CCT 299/22 is dismissed.

7.         In CCT 251/22 and CCT 252/22 there is no order as to costs.

8.         In CCT 299/22 the Public Protector shall pay the costs in her personal capacity, such costs to include the costs of two counsel.

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE ARTICLE ENQUIRY

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options
Free daily email newsletter Register Now