|
SECTION 3: THE NATIONAL DISASTER MANAGEMENT CENTRE |
| This section outlines the rationale for having a National Disaster Management Centre. It establishes principles to guide its establishment and describes its structure and functions. |
|
|
|
3.1. RATIONALE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NATIONAL DISASTER MANAGEMENT CENTRE In South Africa, the capacity for managing disasters varies from ongoing service and infrastructure provision, as part of longer-term development initiatives, to that of emergency preparedness and response (usually triggered by a rapid-onset event). Currently, however, there are a number of shortcomings that hamper effective disaster management. These include the lack of:
One way to help overcome these obstacles is to develop and establish a management structure spearheaded at national level by a National Disaster Management Centre ("the centre"). This would ensure that an effective disaster management strategy would be established and implemented. Because national coordination is urgently required, the centre should coordinate disaster management at various levels and promote and assist the implementation of cross-sectoral disaster management activities. Thus, the centre should primarily function as a coordinating structure that is a repository and conduit of information pertaining to disaster management. It should, therefore, greatly strengthen existing capacity for tracking, monitoring and disseminating information on phenomena and activities that trigger disaster events. It should also act in an advisory capacity to the Inter-Ministerial Committee. 3.2. GUIDING PRINCIPLES The following principles should guide the establishment, structure and functions of the centre:
3.3. STRUCTURE AND LOCATION OF THE CENTRE As a result of the current fragmented and poorly coordinated approach to disaster management, there is no integrated national disaster management strategy or plan that supports local level responses to emergencies and disaster mitigation in the long-term. Comprehensive, coherent and appropriate disaster management training and community awareness strategies and programmes are also absent. These limitations militate against the immediate establishment of a fully-fledged centre in the short-term. The centre should spearhead the development of a comprehensive national disaster management thrust. To set the process in motion, it is proposed that the centre should be established as a core structure, made up of a few key trained personnel and capable of being expanded and adapted, as the need arises. Currently, the Minister for Provincial Affairs and Constitutional Development is responsible for the establishment and management of the centre. The centre already exists in an embryonic form, under the auspices of this department. The Department of Constitutional Development will manage the centre, at least as an interim measure until a permanent home is found for it. This interim measure is appropriate because the department is closely linked to local government, through its direct involvement with issues relating to local government. If the centre is to remain a structure within government, it should be located in a national department that performs tasks that cut across individual responsibilities such as water, health, agriculture and so on. Examples of such departments in the current situation are: the Department of Constitutional Development, the Department of Public Service and Administration and the Department of Finance. This would facilitate improved disaster management planning and financial allocation, which would not unwittingly favour or neglect any relevant functional responsibility. Crucially, such a department will need to facilitate both disaster management and risk reduction activities. The proposed location and legal standing of the centre in the envisaged institutional structure for disaster management is set out in the organogram below. Stakeholders should carefully examine the viability and practical application of this model.
|
|
Note:
|
|
Proposed location and legal status of the National Disaster Management Centre
|
|
Explanatory note to the organogram
|
|
3.4. KEY FUNCTIONS OF THE CENTRE In keeping with the incremental approach to the establishment of the centre, a similar phased-in approach regarding its functions and activities should be adopted. 3.4.1. Information management One of the most important functions of the centre should be its ability to act as a repository and conduit of information on issues pertaining to disaster management. It should serve as an information management and advice centre to all spheres of government, the private sector and the broader community on risk reduction and disaster management. In order to enable the centre to perform this critical function, it must have the authority to compel government and other role players to make the requisite information available. It must be able to monitor requests and recommendations made by it. A key output of the centre would be the development of a composite range of disaster management information strategies. Stage one
Stage two
3.4.2. Preparation of strategies, policies and plans The centre should focus on preparing and compiling appropriate disaster management strategies, discreet policies such as drought and flood management policies and contingency plans, including emergency procedures and so on. The compilation of disaster plans is essential for, inter alia, anticipating disasters, developing and implementing risk reduction strategies and coordinating disaster response among all role players. Stage one
All the aspects of disaster management are reflected in these models. One phase follows the next and, in some instances, phases occur simultaneously as depicted in Model B. In such instances disaster management is seen as a continuous process and disasters are managed as a parallel series of activities rather than a sequence of actions.
Stage two
3.4.3. Assessing vulnerability The key to successfully reducing the effects of a disaster is to understand the nature of the potential disaster and the factors that contribute to it. Once this information is available, the ability to develop community mitigation, planning and advice is greatly increased. The principal outputs for the centre are to enhance capacity to assess vulnerability, determine levels of risk and ensure appropriate mitigation and effective disaster reduction. Stage one
Stage two
3.4.4. Coordination and support during disaster and emergency situations When an emergency or disaster situation arises, the centre and other relevant disaster management structures should be able to expand their capacity and re-focus their activities to enable them to respond rapidly and effectively. In order to facilitate the temporary expansion of the centre in crisis situations, support plans should be developed to enable the temporary release of personnel to the centre when an emergency or disaster occurs. Government at all levels should, in consultation with relevant role players (including organised labour), compile lists of those persons who may be released temporarily to the centre on short notice. An expanded centre should ensure that key decision-makers, such as the members of the IMC, receive the best available information and advice regarding response activities. Since the centre would hold information pertaining to the various levels of disaster and emergency management, decisions could be taken at the level appropriate to the scale of the disaster or emergency. Stage one
Stage two
3.4.5. Non-emergency situations During non-emergency situations, the centre should focus on longer-term risk reduction such as making inputs into the setting and implementation of minimum standards for low cost housing It should ensure that cooperation and support are provided to emergency and essential service organisations. Contact, information exchange and dissemination and liaison should be ongoing between the centre and such service organisations. Then when an emergency occurs, clear mandates and lines of responsibility are understood by all players in the response and recovery chain. 3.4.6. Conducting audits Stages one and two There are numerous players in the disaster management arena. These include national, provincial, and local government, the private sector, NGOs, and broader civil society. Each performs various disaster management functions. These, however, may not be clearly defined or widely known. The centre should therefore, in consultation with existing structures, audit the current capacity, structures, responsibilities and reporting mechanisms of all organs involved in disaster management and related activities. The auditing of current capacity in disaster management and the identification and delineation of clear lines of responsibility and functions will facilitate the integration of the centre's information gathering role with relevant existing programmes. The key strategy would be to dovetail the requirements and information needs of the centre with national, provincial and local initiatives and programmes that are already functioning and which are effective. 3.4.7. Training and community awareness The centre should facilitate disaster management training and promote community awareness of disaster and risk reduction. Stage one
Stage two
|
|
How to read the White Paper | Foreword by the Minister of Provincial Affairs and Constitutional Development | Section 1: Introduction | Section 2: Setting the context | Section 3: The National Disaster Management Centre | Section 4: Funding disaster management | Section 5: A national Disaster Management Act | Section 6: Training and community awareness | Section 7: Conclusion | Appendices | The drafting team and acknowledgements |