![Minister of Constitutional Development and Another v South African Restructuring and Insolvency Practitioners Association and Others (CCT13/17) [2018] ZACC 20](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized/0000738363_resized_legallawgaveljudiciary221022.jpg)
Click here to read the full judgment on Saflii
Section 9(2) of the Constitution — remedial and restitutionary equality — Van Heerden test — arbitrariness and rationality as separate requirements — rule of law
Van Heerden test — reasonably capable of attaining desired outcome of transformation of the insolvency industry — facts on record do not show policy is reasonably likely to achieve equality
Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 — section 158 — policy for the appointment of provisional trustees — ultra vires — displacement of the Master’s discretion
Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 — section 158 — policy for the appointment of provisional trustees — arbitrary — exclusion of citizens born on and after 27 April 1994 — no reasons justifying exclusion
Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 — section 158 — policy for the appointment of provisional trustees — irrational — failure to show policy is reasonably capable of achieving equality