Guide to UIF and other Covid-19 options (UPDATED: 09 April 2020)

30th March 2020

Guide to UIF and other Covid-19 options (UPDATED: 09 April 2020)

Much confusion has arisen with the introduction of the Covid-19 temporary employee / employer relief scheme (C19 TERS), previously referred to as a “National Disaster Benefit”, in terms of a directive that was gazetted on 26 March 2020.

But C19 TERS is not the only UIF relief option available in the case of a temporary lay-offs. Many employers have already laid off their employees without pay and submitted claims under the UIF ‘Reduced working time’ option.

[NOTE: The confusion has by and large been caused by a more recent Easy- Aid Guide for Employers released by the Department of Labour that seems to confuse C19 TERS document requirements with that of the UIF ‘Reduced working time’ option. To avoid confusion, we have made available the previous version of the UIF Easy-Aid Guide and all other documents associated with claims at the link below]

So, what is the difference between these two options? May employers apply for both?

TEMPORARY LAY-OFF OPTIONS

1. UIF ‘Reduced working time’ option

Although indications are that the C19 TERS is likely to receive priority and seems to be preferred by Department of Labour and Employment, the ‘reduced working time’ option is still available to employers and employees.

The ‘reduced working time’ option is available to employees who have to work short time. This benefit was introduced fairly recently (2018) in the following terms:
“A contributor employed in any sector who loses his or her income due to reduced working time, despite being employed, is entitled to benefits if the contributor’s total income falls below the benefit level that the contributor would have received if he or she had become wholly unemployed, subject to that contributor having enough credits.”

(The Government Gazette is available at the link below).

It has been confirmed that this scheme is also available to employees that are on temporary lay-off without pay during the Covid-19 crisis. The following documents need to be submitted:

(An “UIF Easy-Aid Guide”, as well as the relevant forms, are available at the link below).

Features of the ‘reduced working time’ option:

2. Covid-19 temporary employee / employer relief scheme (C19 TERS)

This scheme is intended to provide emergency relief to enable employers to pay employees that are temporarily laid off due to the Covid-19 crisis.

The directive issued on 26 March 2020 has been amended (in Government Gazette no. 43216, dated 8 April 2020). The most important amendments appear from the following (underlined portions have been inserted in the amended version of the directive):

“Should an employer as a direct result of Covid-19 pandemic close its operations, or a part of the operations, for a 3 (three) month or lesser period and suffer financial distress, the company shall qualify for a Covid19 Temporary Relief Benefit.”

and

“temporary lay-off means a reduction in work following a temporary closure of business, whether total or partial, due to Covid-19 pandemic for the period of the National Disaster.”

These amendments now clearly confirm that an employer does not have to close its operations completely to qualify for benefits under C19 TERS.

(The Government Gazette is available at the link below.)

Features of the COVID-19 TERS option:

(A Covid-19 TERS Easy Aid is available at the link below.)

Which lay-off option do I choose?

There are several considerations. The Covid-19 TERS seems to be intended for as emergency relief with a relatively quick turnaround time. Some bargaining councils and large consortia of employers have been encouraged to make use of this scheme. They would make bulk submissions and, once the benefits are paid over to them, they would pay the benefits to the employees. This should ease the administrative burden on the UIF.

Covid-TERS also seems well suited for employers who foresee that they will not be able to pay their employees in full for a significant period (up to 3 months). The UIF intends to help ‘top up’ salaries to the extent allowed by the income replacement rate sliding scale (but only if this has been agreed upfront with the UIF). This type of relief seems to be in sharp focus by the UIF.

Smaller employers may also make use of the benefit. They would have to decide based on the prospects of the recovery of the business, and whether it is worth their while to comply with the Covid-19 TERS requirements. They also need to consider the practical difficulties that their employees may experience in obtaining their benefits (if the UIF Reduced working time option is chosen), especially during the lock-down period. It is a real possibility that the lock-down period will be extended.

It has now been confirmed that employers with ten or less employees who choose to apply for Covid-19 TERS relief, do not have to enter into the prescribed agreement (MOA) with the UIF. They may be required to provide written or electronic confirmation of acceptance of the terms and conditions of the scheme. Small employers may be accommodated in other ways, but it is still not clear to what extent. Each employer will be judged on its own individual merits. We have our doubts about the capacity of the UIF to give much individual attention in the current circumstances.

Employers must make a choice. They cannot claim under both systems at the same time. It is not clear whether an employer who has already submitted under the ‘reduced working time’ option can withdraw that submission and claim under Covid-19 TERS. In our view this should be possible, though. The UIF Commissioner has indicated that companies that want to make use of Covid-19 TERS should do so before the end of the current lock-down.

While Covid-19 TERS appears to have unique and helpful features, it is a new system and there are likely to be teething problems.

There is no clear right or wrong way. Each company should make a choice based on its own circumstances.

ANNUAL LEAVE

There have been conflicting reports on what employers are entitled to do with regard to leave.

In our view the point of department is this: The 21-day lock-down has been imposed by Government. Neither employers nor employees are to blame. Employees who have to stay at home are unable to tender their services due to the lock-down. They are not entitled to be paid. So, what measures are available to mitigate the financial deprivation suffered by employees during the lock-down?

There seem to be the following options:

On 26 March 2020, a directive was issued by the SA Government acknowledging an employer’s right to insist that employees take annual leave. However, the directive encourages employers to make use of the Covid-19 TERS relief instead (The directive is available at the link below). Until such time that this directive is replaced with a new directive, statements by politicians and others that are in conflict with the directive do not have to be taken seriously.

Employers may already have an arrangement in place that employees use their annual leave credits during the lock-down. It has the advantage of providing immediate financial relief during the lock-down. In such cases employers may decide to apply for the Covid-19 TERS relief. If the claim is successful, the leave granted can be formally reversed. If the Covid-19 TERS benefit is not granted, it would be in order to maintain the original leave arrangement.

Employers can only be expected to do what is reasonable in the light of their unique circumstances and the resources they have available to them.

COIDA AND SICK LEAVE

Covid-19 has been declared an occupational disease. If an employee is absent due to contracting the Coronavirus out of and in the course of his or her employment, it will not be regarded as sick leave. Instead it would be covered in terms of the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act of 1993 (COIDA). The employee must as soon as possible after the commencement of a disease give written notice thereof to his or her employer or to the employer where he or she was last employed, and he or she may also give written notice of the said disease in the prescribed manner to the compensation commissioner. Thereafter, a further process needs to be followed by the employer and a medical practitioner (which we won’t elaborate on in this post.)

If, however, it cannot be shown that the Coronavirus was contracted in the course of the employee’s employment, any period of absence as a result of being infected will be regarded as sick leave.

OTHER UIF OPTIONS

Illness benefits for 14-day quarantine period

This UIF benefit is available to employees who are quarantined for 14 days due the Coronavirus (i.e. “special leave”), irrespective whether the employee has contracted the virus or not. No medical certificate is needed for the first 14 days but the employer and employee have to submit a letter of proof that they have agreed to “special leave”. In addition to the letter referred to above, there is certain other documentation that has to be submitted (See “UIF Easy-Aid Guide” which is available at the link below).

While this option is available in principle, it is not available during the 21-day lock-down, except for employees who are able to work due to being part of essential services. At this stage it seems that it may be used after the lock-down, though.

Death benefits

In the unfortunate event that an employee passes away, certain beneficiaries may apply for benefits (See “UIF Easy-Aid Guide” at the link below). The following documents need to be submitted:

OTHER ‘TERS’ BENEFITS (NON COVID-19 RELATED)

There is another temporary relief benefit scheme (TERS) that was originally introduced towards the end of 2019. It was introduced to assist employers in distress, in order to avoid retrenchments. This scheme – which is overseen by the CCMA – is not to be confused with the Covid-19 TERS scheme.

This scheme does not envisage lay-offs and it enables employees to claim 75% of their remuneration. It involves a rather cumbersome process (e.g. requires the submission of annual financial statements, turnaround plan, etc.). While employers should still be able to submit an application for relief in terms of this scheme, it is unlikely to enjoy priority during the current Covid-19 crisis. (See guideline at the link below).

UPDATES

There have been rapid developments surrounding the Covid-19 crisis and the relief options available. Amidst the confusion, we are doing our best to interpret the regulatory changes in a way that makes sense. The situation may change from day to day and the views expressed above should not be regarded as legal advice.

This document will be updated as matters develop. We will alert our readers of any changes.

For access to the documents, forms and other relevant information referred to above, please click here.

Written by Jan Truter for www.labourwise.co.za

Disclaimer: The material above is provided for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. Neither the author nor the publisher accepts responsibility for any loss or damage that may arise from reliance on information contained in this article.