Africa tax in brief

22nd July 2016

 Africa tax in brief

ANGOLA: Securities Code Regulations enacted

The Securities Code Regulation (Regulation No. 6/16) (the "Regulation") was approved by the Council of Administration of the Capital Market Commission and gazetted on 7 June 2016. The Regulation contains the organisation rules and administrative requirements for open companies and other issuers of securities admitted to trading in regulated markets.

CAMEROON: Tax amnesty on property tax announced

On 21 June 2016, Cameroon’s National Treasury published a notice on its website introducing tax amnesty on property tax. According to the notice, provided that payments of property tax are made before 31 December 2016, no penalties will be levied.

Property tax payments and returns can be submitted through the tax authority’s "mobile tax services” facility.

GABON: Finance Law 2016 – direct taxes

Finance Law 2016 (Law 021/2015 of 1 February 2016), published in the Official Gazette No. 286bis on 15 February 2016, introduces a number of tax amendments, effective as of 1 January 2016 unless otherwise indicated. Significant amendments include:

KENYA: Budget and Finance Bill 2016

The 2016/17 Budget and Finance Bill 2016 was presented to the National Assembly by the Cabinet Secretary for the National Treasury on 8 June 2016. Proposed amendments include:

Amount (KES) per annum

Rate (%)

on the first KES134 164

10

on the next KES126 403

15

on the next KES126 403

20

on the next KES126 403

25

on all income over KES513 373

30

LESOTHO: new tax treaty with South Africa enters into force

The new Lesotho/South Africa Income Tax Treaty (2014) entered into force on 27 May 2016 and generally applies from 1 April 2017, replacing the existing 1997 treaty. In terms of the new treaty:

NIGERIA: electronic payment platforms rolled out

The Federal Inland Revenue Service (“FIRS”) rolled out three electronic tax (“eTax”) payment platforms to enable taxpayers to remit taxes via electronic channels on 20 June 2016. The eTax payment platforms (“ePPs”) are hosted by Remita, Interswitch and NIBSS. While companies and individuals may utilise any of the newly introduced ePPs, ministries, departments and agencies are restricted to the use of Remita.

The ePPs have a robust and user-friendly interface which includes fields for the type of tax, the taxpayer's tax identification number (“TIN”) and other relevant details. The eTax payment platforms provide a test for accuracy as details provided are validated with the taxpayers' TIN. Taxpayers can set up standing orders for the payments of taxes to ensure they do not miss payment deadlines and thereby avoid interest and penalties on late remittances.

Currently, taxpayers remit taxes through the deposit money banks (“DMBs” or “banks”) through a long and often protracted process, plagued by inadequate network connectivity to access the banks' platforms and the restrictive operating hours of the banks. The ePPs will provide around-the-clock access to taxpayers for the remittance of tax due.

NIGERIA: deductible expenses must satisfy the wholly, reasonably, exclusively and necessarily test.

On 31 May 2016, the Tax Appeal Tribunal (“TAT”), in Nigerian Breweries Plc v. Federal Inland Revenue Service (“FIRS”) (TAT/LZ/CIT/EDT/043/2015), held that deductible expenses must satisfy the wholly, reasonably, exclusively and necessarily (“WREN”) test.

Nigerian Breweries Plc (“NB Plc”) and International Beverages Corporation SA (“IBECOR”), both part of the Heineken Group, entered into an arrangement for the procurement of goods outside Nigeria. In terms of this arrangement, IBECOR purchased goods on behalf of NB Plc and invoiced NB Plc for the costs (handling charges and buying commission) of the goods.

FIRS disallowed the deduction of the charges and the commission on the basis that the disputed expenses were incurred outside Nigeria and are therefore non-deductible under the provisions of section 27(i) of the Companies Income Tax Act (“CITA”) and raised additional tax assessments.

NB Plc objected to the assessments on the grounds that, despite the fact that in terms of section 27(i) of the CITA, "any expenses of any description incurred outside Nigeria for and on behalf of any company…" are not tax deductible, it does not refer to expenses incurred by a company for itself outside Nigeria and the guidance on the deductibility of expenses provided by section 24 of the CITA should be considered.

In terms of section 24 of the CITA, a deduction shall be allowed in respect of all expenses for that are wholly, exclusive, necessarily and reasonable incurred in the production of those production of profits.

Therefore, the disputed expenses satisfy the WREN test and are fully deductible in the period incurred.

The FIRS contended, inter alia, that:

The issue to be decided was whether expenses incurred outside Nigeria on behalf of another company are deductible.

The TAT ruled in favour of NB Plc, on the grounds that:

The assessments were set aside.

NIGERIA: Tax Appeal Tribunal rules that reimbursable expenses not liable to VAT and withholding tax

The Tax Appeal Tribunal (“TAT”) on 2 June 2016, in Brasoil Oil Services (Nigeria) Limited v. FIRS ((TAT/VAT/008/2015) and (TAT/WHT/009/2015)), ruled that reimbursable expenses are not liable to VAT and withholding tax (“WHT”).

Petrobras SA (“Petrobras”), a non-resident company, and Brasoil Oil Services (Nigeria) Limited (“Brasoil”) entered into a Technical Services Agreement (“TSA”) for the provision of technical support services, in terms of which Petrobras invoiced Brasoil for the cost of the services provided at a mark-up of 12%, and for the reimbursable expenses incurred on its behalf.

FIRS assessed and charged VAT and WHT on the expenses incurred by Brasoil under the TSA.

Brasoil objected to the assessments on the grounds that, inter alia, reimbursable expenses do not constitute a taxable supply as defined under section 2 of the VAT Act and the TSA was concluded at arm's length. Hence, only the mark-up portion of the invoice was liable to WHT.

The FIRS argued that the supply of technical support services is neither an exempt service nor an exported service, as it was rendered in Nigeria and to a Nigerian company and the TSA was not concluded at arm's length. Therefore, VAT and WHT should be charged on the contract sum, i.e. cost plus mark-up.

The TAT held, inter alia, that all reimbursable expenses paid by Brasoil in line with the TSA are not subject to VAT and WHT.

NIGERIA: revocation of withholding tax at source

The Federal Ministry of Finance has recently approved FIRS’s recommendation to revoke the Withholding Tax Regulations which were effective from 1 January 2015 and reduced the withholding tax rate applicable to payments in respect of all aspects of building, construction and related activities (excluding survey, design and deliveries) from 5% to 2.5%.

Once the Regulations are officially revoked via publication in the Federal Republic of Nigeria Official Gazette, the withholding tax rate applicable to payments in respect of building, construction and related activities will revert to 5%.

RWANDA: 2016/17 Budget

The Budget 2016/17 was presented to the parliament by the Minister of Finance and Economic Planning on 8 June 2016. Proposed amendments include:

TANZANIA: Budget 2016/17 – direct taxation

The Budget for 2016/17 was presented to the National Assembly by the Minister of Finance and Planning on 8 June 2016. Proposed amendments include:

UGANDA: Uganda Income Tax (Amendment) Bill 2016 – details

The 2016/17 Budget was presented to parliament by the Minister of Finance, Planning and Economic Development on 8 June 2016. Proposed amendments include:

The measures became effective on 1 July 2016.

Sources include IBFD, IHS, taxnews.com, and others.

Written by Celia Becker, Africa regulatory and business intelligence, executive, ENSafrica