A colleague’s HIV status is not yours to share

5th September 2023

A colleague’s HIV status is not yours to share

All people who are positively diagnosed with HIV have the legal right to privacy. Employees are not required to disclose their HIV status to their employer or to fellow employees. In turn, where employees voluntarily choose to disclose their HIV status to their employer or to fellow employees, these individuals may not disclose the information to others without the employee’s express consent.

The Free State High Court reinforced the importance of an employee’s right to privacy relating to their HIV status in the recent judgment of K.A.B vs. National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa (NUMSA) and Others. In this matter, an employee had disclosed her HIV status to a colleague, with whom she had a close relationship. The colleague in turn disclosed the employee’s HIV status to the employee’s manager without the employee’s consent.

During a grievance meeting relating to the manager’s conduct, which was attended by the employee and several of her work colleagues, the manager divulged the employee’s HIV status and proceeded to laugh as he walked out of the meeting.

The employee was emotionally distressed by this incident, had suicidal thoughts and was hospitalised, which culminated in her work performance being impacted. Further, the relationship between the employee and the manager became strained. As a result, the employee instituted a defamation claim against the manager and the colleague in whom she had confided and sought damages for the harm suffered.

The Court referred to the case of NM and Others v Smith and Others 2007 CC, in which the Constitutional Court held, ‘There is nothing shameful about suffering from HIV/AIDS. HIV is a disease like any other; however, the social construction and stigma associated with the disease make fear, ignorance and discrimination the key pillars that continue to hinder progress in its prevention and treatment. These pessimistic perceptions persist to fuel prejudice towards people living with HIV/AIDS.’

In the circumstances, the Court found that it was not the manager’s place to disclose the employee’s HIV status, or to disclose such sensitive information about a person’s health in a meeting. The employee’s HIV status constituted her private medical information which was shared without her consent and ‘the more sensitive the information of a person, the more it is important to protect such’. The Court held that the manager’s conduct constituted a wrongful act which defamed the employee’s dignity and reputation, and further violated her right to privacy. As a result, the employee was awarded ZAR 100 000 in damages.

This judgment reiterates the importance of employees’ right to privacy and confidentiality relating to their HIV status or that of their colleagues. In South Africa, stigma and discrimination remain a barrier to employment for people living with HIV. The stigma and negative behaviours that may be displayed towards people living with HIV can negatively impact the health and well-being of the individual concerned and may make them vulnerable in respect of job retention and progression.

It is accordingly important for employers to take heed of the following:

Written by Nadine Mather, Nuria Govender and Phetha Mchunu for Bowmans Law