SOUTH AFRICAN UNIVERSITIES AND TECHNIKONS: |
|||
| SUMMARY OF EXPECTED FEATURES, INDICATORS AND BENCHMARKS | |||
|
EXPECTED FEATURES |
INDICATORS |
BENCHMARKS |
DATA |
| A SA university or technikon should have at least the following features | |||
EQUITY |
|||
| [1] Its student body should reflect the equity requirement that the participation in higher education of previously disadvantaged groups should increase | [1] The % of students by race group and by gender in the institution's enrolment |
[1] At least 40% of on-campus students are African; |
[1] Based on average contact heads for 1999-2000 |
[2] Its staff body should reflect the equity requirement that the participation in higher education of previously disadvantaged groups should increase |
[2] The % of professional staff by race group and gender |
[2] At least 40% of professional staff are African; |
[2] Based on permanent staff data for 2000 |
| STUDENTS | |||
[3] Its student enrolment should be stable, and not subject to major increases and/or declines in intakes and outflows of students. |
[3] Institution's combined student retention and replacement rates |
[3] Retention plus replacement rate = 100% |
[3] Based on averages for 1997-2000 |
| [4] Its total enrolment should be large enough to ensure that it has reasonable spreads of students across a range of fields of study | [4] Unweighted FTE enrolment total | [4] Unweighted enrolment total = 8000 | [4] Based on averages for 1999-2000 |
[5] It should be a comprehensive institution which has a balanced enrolment shape across the broad fields of SET, business and management and humanities. |
[5] Unweighted FTE enrolments by CESM category groupings of SET, business or management and humanities |
For technikons: at least 70% of FTE enrolment in SET+ business/ management[5] For
universities: at least 50% of FTE enrolment in SET + business/ management; |
[5] Based on averages for 1999-2000 |
|
EXPECTED FEATURES |
INDICATORS |
BENCHMARKS |
DATA |
|
A SA university or technikon should have at least the following features |
|||
|
ACADEMIC STAFF |
|||
|
[6] It should have student to academic staff ratios which ensure that adequate numbers of full-time staff are available to serve the needs of its students |
[6] Ratio of FTE students to full-time equivalent academics |
[6] Ratios of FTE students to FTE academic staff: (a)
universities: 20 unweighted FTE students : 1 |
{6} Based on FTE student and FTE academic staff data for 2000 |
|
[7] It should have a well-qualified academic staff |
[7] % of permanent academic staff with masters or doctoral qualifications |
[7] For universities: at least 50% of permanent academics with doctorates For technikons: at least 35% of permanent academics with either masters or doctorates |
[7] Based on permanent staff data for 2000 |
|
STUDENT OUTPUTS |
|||
[8] Its output of undergraduates should satisfy the norms set by the NPHE. |
[8] Graduates/enrolments as % for 3-year undergraduate qualifications |
[8] Graduates/enrolments as % meets the NPHE benchmark of 25% |
[8] Based on enrolment and graduate totals for 1999 & 2000 |
[9] Its output of postgraduates should satisfy the norms set by the NPHE. |
[9] Graduates/enrolments as % for masters and doctoral qualifications |
[9] Graduates/enrolments as % meets the NPHE benchmarks: 33% masters and 20% doctorates |
[9] Based on enrolment and graduate totals for 1999 & 2000 |
|
STAFF OUTPUTS |
|||
|
Its academic staff should produce reasonable numbers of research outputs in the form of: (10) research publications; |
[10] Ratio of subsidy publication units to permanent academic staff members |
[10] For universities: at least 1 subsidy publication unit per permanent academic per annum For technikons: at least 0.5 weighted research units per permanent academic per annum |
[10] Average subsidy publication units for 1998-1999 and permanent academics for 2000 |
|
EXPECTED FEATURES |
INDICATORS |
BENCHMARKS |
DATA |
|
A SA university or technikon should have at least the following features: (11) masters and doctors graduates. |
[11] Ratio of weighted total of masters plus doctoral graduates to permanent academic staff members |
[11] For universities: For technikons: |
[11] Average masters and doctors graduates for 1999-2000 and permanent academics for 2000 |
|
INSTITUTIONAL FEATURES |
|||
|
[12] It should be financially stable and sustainable. |
[12] Assessment prepared by professional DoE consultant |
[12] Assessment as a 'going concern' of at least 4 on 5-point scale: |
[12] Institutional financial tables for 2000 |