The provincial education departments are responsible for matters related to the implementation of policy in the General and Further Education bands. Conducting examinations is therefore a provincial responsibility. The national Department of Education is not directly involved in the administration of examinations but is responsible for the formulation of policy and the maintenance of national standards in the implementation of these policies.
This report focuses on the administration of the 1999 Senior Certificate examinations detailing the following:
In the last three years the national and provincial departments have implemented various strategies to improve the administration of the Senior Certificate Examinations. These include:
Table 1 represents a summary of the staff composition in the examination units of the provincial education departments.
There appears to be a serious shortage of staff in the provincial education departments. Only two of the provincial education departments, i.e. the Western Cape and the Northern Cape have their full staff complement. At least three of the provincial education departments, i.e. Northern Province, Mpumalanga and North West are working with half their staff complement. The other provinces are working with between 60% and 80% of their staff.
Departments
| PROV | CATEGORY | APPROVED STAFF ESTABLISHMENT |
PRESENT STAFF COMPLEMENT |
||||
| Total Number | Perm. | Temp. | Second. | Contract | Vacant | ||
| NP | PROF | 7 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
||
| ADMIN | 57 |
31 |
26 |
||||
| UNSKILLED | 20 |
13 |
7 |
||||
| TOTAL | 84 |
47 |
3 |
34 |
|||
| MP | PROF | 12 |
5 |
7 |
|||
| ADMIN | 52 |
19 |
2 |
5 |
26 |
||
| UNSKILLED | |||||||
| TOTAL | 64 |
24 |
2 |
5 |
33 |
||
| NW * | PROF | 24 |
19 |
5 |
|||
| ADMIN | 84 |
38 |
46 |
||||
| UNSKILLED | |||||||
| TOTAL | 108 |
57 |
51 |
||||
| GP | PROF | 21 |
15 |
2 |
4 |
||
| ADMIN | 32 |
20 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
|
| UNSKILLED | 4 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|||
| TOTAL | 57 |
36 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
13 |
|
| FS | PROF | 7 |
5 |
2 |
|||
| ADMIN | 15 |
11 |
4 |
||||
| UNSKILLED | 8 |
4 |
4 |
||||
| TOTAL | 30 |
20 |
10 |
||||
| KZN | PROF | 7 |
5 |
2 |
|||
| ADMIN | 49 |
17 |
32 |
||||
| UNSKILLED | |||||||
| TOTAL | 56 |
22 |
32 |
2 |
|||
| EC | PROF | 8 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
| ADMIN | 58 |
49 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
||
| UNSKILLED | 9 |
8 |
1 |
||||
| TOTAL | 75 |
61 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
10 |
|
| NC | PROF | 2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
||
| ADMIN | 12 |
12 |
|||||
| UNSKILLED | 3 |
3 |
|||||
| TOTAL | 17 |
17 |
1 |
1 |
|||
| WC | PROF | 2 |
2 |
||||
| ADMIN | 97 |
97 |
|||||
| UNSKILLED | |||||||
| TOTAL | 99 |
99 |
|||||
| TOTAL | PROF | 90 |
60 |
1 |
7 |
1 |
24 |
| ADMIN | 456 |
294 |
3 |
39 |
7 |
119 |
|
| UNSKILLED | 44 |
29 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
|
| TOTAL | 590 |
383 |
5 |
46 |
8 |
157 |
|
* The staff complement in the North West province includes the Curriculum and Examination Units.
The shortage of staff creates tremendous strain on existing staff who in certain cases are expected to work long hours in order to meet deadlines. In KwaZulu-Natal, although they have almost 96% of their staff complement, 57% of their staff are seconded. This situation is not suitable for an Examination Directorate where stability is vital. Most of the provinces have quoted financial constraints as the reason for not filling the vacant posts.
Table 2 represents the full-time and part-time enrolments of all nine provinces for the 1998 and 1999 Senior Certificate examinations respectively.
| PROVINCE | YEAR | FULL TIME CANDIDATES |
PART-TIME CANDIDATES |
||
NUMBER |
% of TOTAL |
NUMBER |
% of TOTAL |
||
| NP | 1998 | 119 884 |
20.6% |
37 508 |
14.6% |
| 1999 | 111 136 |
20.1% |
32 885 |
13.8% |
|
| MP | 1998 | 43 746 |
7.5% |
18 558 |
7.2% |
| 1999 | 41 109 |
7.4% |
21 261 |
8.9% |
|
| NW | 1998 | 43 632 |
7.5% |
31 495 |
12.3% |
| 1999 | 38 270 |
6.9% |
29 736 |
12.4% |
|
| GP | 1998 | 82 566 |
14.2% |
49 165 |
19.1% |
| 1999 | 78 074 |
14.1% |
46 861 |
19.6% |
|
| FS | 1998 | 42 895 |
7.4% |
23 715 |
9.2% |
| 1999 | 35 773 |
6.5 % |
23 487 |
9.8% |
|
| KZN | 1998 | 118 678 |
20.4% |
32 496 |
12.7% |
| 1999 | 112 182 |
20.3% |
31 338 |
13.1% |
|
| EC | 1998 | 82 517 |
14.2% |
46 000 |
17.9% |
| 1999 | 87 853 |
15.9% |
36 095 |
15.1% |
|
| NC | 1998 | 7 606 |
1.3% |
2 727 |
1.1% |
| 1999 | 7 527 |
1.4% |
2 699 |
1.1% |
|
| WC | 1998 | 40 022 |
6.9% |
15 080 |
5.9% |
| 1999 | 41 375 |
7.5% |
14 645 |
6.1% |
|
| TOTAL | 1998 | 581 546 |
100% |
256 744 |
100% |
| 1999 | 553 299 |
100% |
239 007 |
100% |
|
In seven of the nine provinces there has been a decrease in the 1999 full-time enrollment when compared to 1998. In the Eastern and Western Cape there has been an increase in the enrollment of full-time candidates. In all the provinces, except Mpumalanga there is a decrease in the enrollment of part-time candidates when compared to 1998. Nationally there has been a 4,9% decrease in the full-time enrollment i.e. 28 247 fewer candidates sat for the senior certificate this year.
In terms of subject and grade changes, five of the provinces have indicated that there is a decrease in the number of candidates entering certain key subjects, i.e. Mathematics, Physical science, Biology, History and Accounting. The following is an example of some of the changes:
The above changes relate in the main to a change from Higher to Standard Grade and in most cases it implies an increase in the standard grade enrollments in these subjects. In at least three provinces, i.e. Gauteng, KwaZulu Natal, and Western Cape there has been a decrease in the number of candidates enrolling for Biblical Studies. This could mean that learners are beginning to make more meaningful subject choices and are more realistic about the Grade on which the subject is written.
Table 3 below represents the responses of the provincial education departments to the management of certain key processes in the examination cycle. The responses of the provincial education departments are recorded on a three-point scale, i.e. poorly managed (i.e. a number of problems were experienced); fairly managed (a few minor problems were experienced) or well managed (no problems experienced). The figures in the columns below represent the number of provincial departments that responded to the particular statement in terms of the above scale.
| PROCESS | POOR | FAIR | WELL | |
| 1 | Appointment of examiners and moderators | 1 (NC) | 8 | |
| 2 | Registration of candidates (Part-time/Full- time) | 2 (GP, NC) | 7 | |
| 3 | Submission of question papers to the internal and external moderator | 3 (WC, NC, NP) | 6 | |
| 4 | Typing and editing of the question papers | 2 (NP, NW) | 1 (KZ) | 6 |
| 5 | Printing of question papers | 1 (EC) | 8 | |
| 6 | Packaging of question papers | 1 (NW) | 8 | |
| 7 | Distribution of question papers | 9 | ||
| 8 | Storage of question papers | 1 (WC) | 8 | |
| 9 | Registration of new examination centres | 1(GP) | 8 | |
| 10 | Training of invigilators | 4(GP, WC, NC, NW) | 5 | |
| 11 | Selection and appointment of markers | 4(GP, WC, NC, NP) | 5 | |
| 12 | Establishment of marking centres | 3 (NC, NP, FS) | 6 | |
| 13 | Capture of oral, practical and year marks | 3(GP, WC, EC) | 6 | |
| 14 | Security | 4 (WC, NC, EC, NW) | 5 |
Most of the provinces managed the majority of the key processes in the examination cycle well. Over the last three years there has been a progressive improvement in the administration of the Senior Certificate examinations.
However, two of the provinces (EC, NW) indicated that they experienced problems with the typing and editing of question papers. The lack of appointed editors in these provinces has contributed to this problem. Provinces experienced minor problems in the following areas:
The details of some of the problems experienced by the provincial education departments and the remedial measures adopted are listed below:
The above problems are not major problems and will be attended to as part of the ongoing refinement and improvement of the examinations. The Inter-provincial Examinations Committee (IPEC) will convene early next year to discuss these problems and to put remedial measures in place. In the interim the provincial departments will be monitored by the national Department to ensure that these problems are given proper attention.
Five of the provinces i.e. Free State, Northern Cape, Eastern Cape, North West and the Northern Province indicated that not all their institutions are fully equipped to conduct the examinations. Special mention was made of schools in the rural areas that lack proper facilities. In the Free State, it was indicated that in certain cases dilapidated buildings are used as examination venues.
However, provincial departments have authorised schools to use community facilities, e.g. community halls if the facilities at the schools are not appropriate. There was also the problem of ABET centres in the North West province that did not have adequate furniture.
Direct communication with examination centres is a problem in certain provinces, especially with those located in the rural areas where telecommunication facilities are inadequate. Provincial departments have overcome these communication problems through a network system established, via the regional, district and area offices.
In all the provinces, except the Western Cape, educators at school are responsible for invigilation as part of their teaching responsibilities. In the Western Cape, private invigilators are appointed to conduct the examinations at schools. In the other provinces private invigilators are appointed to assist with private candidates. In Gauteng, due to the poor standard of invigilation at some of the inner city independent schools, private invigilators are appointed.
All provinces have monitoring teams in place to monitor the writing of the examination and the marking process. These teams are operational at provincial, regional and district level. There are also monitoring teams from the national Department of Education and from the South African Certification Council (SAFCERT).
The problems encountered by most provinces were of a minor nature relating to shortages of question papers at certain centres, change of grades by candidates, errata to questions, etc. Most of these problems were of such a nature that they could be resolved at school level.
The serious problems included the following:
A comprehensive list of all the irregularities reported to the national Department of Education is as follows:
WESTERN CAPE
NORTHERN CAPE
FREE STATE
EASTERN CAPE
KWAZULU-NATAL
MPUMALANGA
NORTHERN PROVINCE
GAUTENG
NORTH WEST
All the irregularities will be handled by the Irregularities Committee established in each province for this purpose. The National Policy on the Conduct of the Senior Certificate examinations provides clear guidelines to provincial education departments on the handling of these irregularities.
It however needs to be noted that due to the swift response of the provincial officials, the above irregularities have not compromised the integrity of the examination as a whole.
The security at the examination centres is poor and therefore all provinces except the Western Cape store question papers at Regional and District offices. Question papers are delivered to the examination centres on a daily basis. In the Western Cape schools have adequate strong room facilities for the storage of question papers are stored at schools. The Western Cape also delivers question papers to certain examination centres, where there are no strong room facilities, on the morning of the examination.
In the other provinces security at the regional and district offices have been improved by employing security guards on 24-hour duty. In some of the provinces the SAPS have inspected the security at these offices. Two of the provinces, i.e. Eastern Cape and North West province, have indicated that there is room for improvement in this area.
Except in the case of the Western Cape, scripts are returned to the district office or a storage point on a daily basis. From the district office or the storage point each province has its own programme for the collection of scripts. In the Western Cape scripts are collected from the schools at least three times per week.
Table 4 provides some information on the marking process in each of the nine provinces.
| PROVINCE | CENTRALISED/DECENTRALISED | NO. OF MARKING CENTRES |
NO. OF MARKERS |
| Western Cape | Centralized | 1 |
1 900 |
| Northern Cape | Centralized | 2 |
478 |
| Eastern Cape | Decentralized | 5 |
4 300 |
| KwaZulu Natal | Decentralized | 14 |
6 800 |
| Free State | Centralised | 1 |
2 100 |
| Gauteng | Decentralised | 3 |
12 000 |
| North West | Decentralised | 10 |
2 153 |
| Mpumalanga | Decentralised | 7 |
2 477 |
| Northern Province | Decentralised | 13 |
6 304 |
| TOTAL | 56 |
38 512 |
Gauteng uses the staggered marking approach, where marking commences immediately after the paper is written. Each marking centre is therefore used for four marking sessions. The duration of each marking session in Gauteng is reduced to an average of four days (compared to ten days in the other provinces) and therefore a larger number of markers are used in this province
Prospective markers complete application forms which are verified by the school principal and the district office in certain provinces. A panel constituted in terms of the national policy on examinations then selects the markers. The criteria used for the selection of these markers are also prescribed in the national policy on examinations. Provision is made for novice markers and for representivity (i.e. gender and race).
In all the provinces the Chief Markers trains the markers. This is normally done a day before the marking process begins. The training session includes a detailed discussion of the marking memorandum, a discussion of the application of the marking memorandum and other marking procedures.
In order to ensure the quality of marking, a team of seven markers work under the supervision of a senior marker. Seven senior markers work under the supervision of a chief marker. If the number of senior markers exceeds seven, then Deputy Chief Markers are appointed to supervise the work of the Senior Markers. Senior markers, Deputy Chief Markers and Chief Markers must moderate 10% of the scripts of the markers they supervise. The internal moderator then moderates 10% of the scripts per question paper. In addition examination assistants are appointed to check each script to ensure that the entire script is marked and to check the addition of the marks.
In all the provinces the marks are captured in-house, except in the case of the Eastern Cape where the oral and practical marks are captured in-house but the examination marks are out-sourced to a reputable data-capture company.
In all provinces the double capture method is used i.e. the marks are captured by the first Data Capturer and then re-captured by a second Data-Capturer. Any difference between the first and second capture is highlighted by the computer system. In some of the provinces e.g. Gauteng an audit of a sample of the scripts, mark sheets, and computer printouts is done.
All 9 provinces are confident about the provincial capacity to handle the processing and the standardisation of results.
The Council of Education Ministers has decided that the senior certificate results should be released between 28 December 1999 and 30 December 1999. This is a precautionary measure to avoid any Y2K related complications. No problems are anticipated with the early release of the results. However, contingency plans are in place to take care of unexpected problems that may occur. These contingency plans include:
Only three provinces are satisfied with the current SAFCERT standardisation process. Comments on the process are as follows:
The entire standardisation of the senior certificate examination will be a part of an investigation to be carried out by the Department of Education in 2000.
Five of the nine provinces are currently implementing continuous assessment in some form or the other. These provinces include Western Cape, Gauteng, Northern Cape, Mpumalanga and the Eastern Cape. Table 5 below provides additional information on the implementation of the year mark in the above five provinces:
| PROV. | SUBJECTS | WEIGHTING |
MODERATION MECHANISM |
| WC | All |
25 - 33% |
Face moderation by subject advisors and statistically moderated by SAFCERT |
| GP | All |
40% |
Moderation of year mark exams by district officials and statistically moderated by SAFCERT |
| NC | All |
25 - 33% |
Face moderation, 10% of portfolios are moderated and statistical moderation by SAFCERT |
| MP | Biology |
25% |
10% of schools are moderated and thereafter all mark-sheets are moderated. Also subjected to SAFCERT statistical moderation. |
| EC | History |
20- 25% |
Face moderation and statistical moderation by SAFCERT |
In the case of the Western Cape the year mark could be higher in practical subjects e.g. Art (50%); Technical subjects (42%) and Music (50%). The oral component in the languages constitutes 33% of the final mark.
Three of the provinces have indicated that they intend implementing the year mark in 2000. These provinces are NorthWest, Northern Province and KwaZulu-Natal. These provinces have already drafted plans and are on schedule to implement continuous assessment in the year 2000. KwaZulu Natal has run pilot projects as part of their planning for the implementation of the year mark in 2000. Only one province viz. Free State does not have any strategy in place to implement continuous assessment in the year 2000.
Problems experienced by the provincial education departments in the implementation of the year mark include:
The national Department of Education is in the process of drafting a national guideline document which will provide a clear framework for the implementation of continuous assessment in Grade 12. This document will ensure uniformity in the implementation of continuous assessment across the nine provincial education departments. The document has been presented to the Inter-provincial Examinations Committee (IPEC) for their comment and thereafter it will be submitted to HEDCOM for approval and to be implemented in the year 2000.
Current practice in South Africa is to hold supplementary examinations early in the year following the final examination in October/November of the previous year. Supplementary examinations are conducted to give a second opportunity to learners who lack one or two requirements to obtain a senior certificate pass or a senior certificate with endorsement. Statistics for the 1999 supplementary examination are summarised in table 6 below:
| PROVINCE | REGISTERED FOR THE EXAM |
WROTE THE EXAM |
PERCENTAGE WROTE |
| N. Province | 15 031 |
12 842 |
85 |
| Mpumalanga | 6 504 |
4 958 |
76 |
| North West | 3 687 |
2 985 |
81 |
| Gauteng | 6 948 |
5 391 |
78 |
| Free State | 7 703 |
5 055 |
66 |
| KwaZulu Natal | 7 200 |
7 200 |
100 |
| Eastern Cape | 18 853 |
13 148 |
70 |
| N. Cape | 945 |
822 |
87 |
| W Cape | 4894 |
3227 |
66 |
| TOTAL | 71 765 |
55 628 |
78 |
All nine provinces have already commenced with preparations for the 2000 supplementary examinations. The following forms part of their plans:
Seven out of nine provinces feel that the supplementary examinations should be phased out. The reasons cited are as follows:
Only the Western Cape and Free State feel that it should not be phased out. The problem with the supplementary examination being scrapped would be that candidates who qualify for the supplementary examination due to valid reasons would be disadvantaged.
Examinations are fully funded by provincial education departments of education. The budget allocations per province are listed in table 7 below:
| PROVINCE | BUDGET |
| Northern Province | 64 359 743 |
| Mpumalanga | 23 175 000 |
| North West | 23 698 000 |
| Gauteng | 32 000 000 |
| Free State | 15 000 000 |
| KwaZulu Natal | 73 000 000 |
| Eastern Cape | 46 789 000 |
| Northern Cape | 8 982 000 |
| Western Cape | 16 000 000 |
| TOTAL | 303 003 743 |
The examination budget of the nine provincial education departments varies from 8 million in the Northern Cape to 73 million in KwaZulu-Natal. The total budget for all nine provincial education departments amounts to R303 million. Mpumalanga, KwaZulu-Natal and the Northern Cape have indicated that their current budget is adequate. The other 6 provinces have indicated that their budgets are inadequate. Problems relating to the budget include:
There is general consensus among the provinces that an examination fee should be instituted to offset the high examination costs. This matter will receive full consideration by the Council of Education Ministers early in the year 2000.
As part of the Ministry's ongoing review of the Senior Certificate Examinations, the Minister of Education, Professor Kader Asmal, requested the Cambridge International Examinations to conduct an international review and benchmarking of all procedures relating to the conduct of the South African Senior Certificate Examinations.
The following is a summary of the findings of this review:
The recommendations of the review by the Cambridge International Examinations were discussed extensively at the meeting of the Heads of Education Departments (HEDCOM) and this will be further discussed at the meeting of the Council of Education Ministers (CEM) early in the new year. Emanating from these discussions a clear plan of action will be put in place to implement the important recommendations.
As a follow up to this review the Council of Education Ministers (CEM) has already approved the international benchmarking of the standards of the Senior Certificate examinations. As a first step the Senior Certificate will be benchmarked with the Scottish Higher Examination Authorities and this process is scheduled to commence in the year 2000.
The provincial education departments administered the first Senior Certificate examination in 1996. In this examination the disparate practices and procedures of the ex-departments had to be amalgamated and the exercise was fraught with serious problems. However, over the last four years, through the intervention of the national Department of Education and the closer collaboration between provincial education departments, a remarkable improvement in the examination process has resulted. The focused approach to the administration of the examinations and the exceptional commitment of all officials have contributed to this improvement.
Despite the fact that certain areas are still in need of refinement, the examination system in the country is currently of a high standard. The following are some of the areas that are in need of refinement or change: