THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE 1999 SENIOR CERTIFICATE EXAMINATIONS

1. INTRODUCTION

The provincial education departments are responsible for matters related to the implementation of policy in the General and Further Education bands. Conducting examinations is therefore a provincial responsibility. The national Department of Education is not directly involved in the administration of examinations but is responsible for the formulation of policy and the maintenance of national standards in the implementation of these policies.

This report focuses on the administration of the 1999 Senior Certificate examinations detailing the following:

In the last three years the national and provincial departments have implemented various strategies to improve the administration of the Senior Certificate Examinations. These include:


2. STAFF ESTABLISHMENT IN THE EXAMINATION DIRECTORATES/SUB-DIRECTORATES

2.1. STAFF COMPOSITION

Table 1 represents a summary of the staff composition in the examination units of the provincial education departments.

There appears to be a serious shortage of staff in the provincial education departments. Only two of the provincial education departments, i.e. the Western Cape and the Northern Cape have their full staff complement. At least three of the provincial education departments, i.e. Northern Province, Mpumalanga and North West are working with half their staff complement. The other provinces are working with between 60% and 80% of their staff.

Table 1: Summary of the Staff Composition in the Examination Units of the Provincial Education Departments.

Departments

PROV CATEGORY

APPROVED STAFF

ESTABLISHMENT

PRESENT STAFF COMPLEMENT

Total Number Perm. Temp. Second. Contract Vacant
NP PROF

7

3

3

1

ADMIN

57

31

26

UNSKILLED

20

13

7

TOTAL

84

47

3

34

MP PROF

12

5

7

ADMIN

52

19

2

5

26

UNSKILLED
TOTAL

64

24

2

5

33

NW * PROF

24

19

5

ADMIN

84

38

46

UNSKILLED
TOTAL

108

57

51

GP PROF

21

15

2

4

ADMIN

32

20

3

1

1

7

UNSKILLED

4

1

1

2

TOTAL

57

36

4

3

1

13

FS PROF

7

5

2

ADMIN

15

11

4

UNSKILLED

8

4

4

TOTAL

30

20

10

KZN PROF

7

5

2

ADMIN

49

17

32

UNSKILLED
TOTAL

56

22

32

2

EC PROF

8

4

1

1

2

ADMIN

58

49

1

1

7

UNSKILLED

9

8

1

TOTAL

75

61

1

2

1

10

NC PROF

2

2

1

1

ADMIN

12

12

UNSKILLED

3

3

TOTAL

17

17

1

1

WC PROF

2

2

ADMIN

97

97

UNSKILLED
TOTAL

99

99

TOTAL PROF

90

60

1

7

1

24

ADMIN

456

294

3

39

7

119

UNSKILLED

44

29

1

0

0

14

TOTAL

590

383

5

46

8

157

* The staff complement in the North West province includes the Curriculum and Examination Units.

The shortage of staff creates tremendous strain on existing staff who in certain cases are expected to work long hours in order to meet deadlines. In KwaZulu-Natal, although they have almost 96% of their staff complement, 57% of their staff are seconded. This situation is not suitable for an Examination Directorate where stability is vital. Most of the provinces have quoted financial constraints as the reason for not filling the vacant posts.


3. SENIOR CERTIFICATE ENROLMENT STATISTICS

3.1. SENIOR CERTIFICATE ENROLMENTS

Table 2 represents the full-time and part-time enrolments of all nine provinces for the 1998 and 1999 Senior Certificate examinations respectively.

Table 2: Full-time and part-time enrolments of all nine provinces for the 1998 and 1999 Senior Certificate examinations respectively
PROVINCE YEAR

FULL TIME CANDIDATES

PART-TIME CANDIDATES

NUMBER

% of TOTAL

NUMBER

% of TOTAL

NP 1998

119 884

20.6%

37 508

14.6%

1999

111 136

20.1%

32 885

13.8%

MP 1998

43 746

7.5%

18 558

7.2%

1999

41 109

7.4%

21 261

8.9%

NW 1998

43 632

7.5%

31 495

12.3%

1999

38 270

6.9%

29 736

12.4%

GP 1998

82 566

14.2%

49 165

19.1%

1999

78 074

14.1%

46 861

19.6%

FS 1998

42 895

7.4%

23 715

9.2%

1999

35 773

6.5 %

23 487

9.8%

KZN 1998

118 678

20.4%

32 496

12.7%

1999

112 182

20.3%

31 338

13.1%

EC 1998

82 517

14.2%

46 000

17.9%

1999

87 853

15.9%

36 095

15.1%

NC 1998

7 606

1.3%

2 727

1.1%

1999

7 527

1.4%

2 699

1.1%

WC 1998

40 022

6.9%

15 080

5.9%

1999

41 375

7.5%

14 645

6.1%

TOTAL 1998

581 546

100%

256 744

100%

1999

553 299

100%

239 007

100%

In seven of the nine provinces there has been a decrease in the 1999 full-time enrollment when compared to 1998. In the Eastern and Western Cape there has been an increase in the enrollment of full-time candidates. In all the provinces, except Mpumalanga there is a decrease in the enrollment of part-time candidates when compared to 1998. Nationally there has been a 4,9% decrease in the full-time enrollment i.e. 28 247 fewer candidates sat for the senior certificate this year.

In terms of subject and grade changes, five of the provinces have indicated that there is a decrease in the number of candidates entering certain key subjects, i.e. Mathematics, Physical science, Biology, History and Accounting. The following is an example of some of the changes:

Gauteng
Western Cape

The above changes relate in the main to a change from Higher to Standard Grade and in most cases it implies an increase in the standard grade enrollments in these subjects. In at least three provinces, i.e. Gauteng, KwaZulu Natal, and Western Cape there has been a decrease in the number of candidates enrolling for Biblical Studies. This could mean that learners are beginning to make more meaningful subject choices and are more realistic about the Grade on which the subject is written.


4. PREPARATION FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE SENIOR CERTIFICATE EXAMINATIONS

Table 3 below represents the responses of the provincial education departments to the management of certain key processes in the examination cycle. The responses of the provincial education departments are recorded on a three-point scale, i.e. poorly managed (i.e. a number of problems were experienced); fairly managed (a few minor problems were experienced) or well managed (no problems experienced). The figures in the columns below represent the number of provincial departments that responded to the particular statement in terms of the above scale.

Table 3: Responses of provincial education departments to the management of certain key processes in the examination cycle
PROCESS POOR FAIR WELL
1 Appointment of examiners and moderators 1 (NC) 8
2 Registration of candidates (Part-time/Full- time) 2 (GP, NC) 7
3 Submission of question papers to the internal and external moderator 3 (WC, NC, NP) 6
4 Typing and editing of the question papers 2 (NP, NW) 1 (KZ) 6
5 Printing of question papers 1 (EC) 8
6 Packaging of question papers 1 (NW) 8
7 Distribution of question papers 9
8 Storage of question papers 1 (WC) 8
9 Registration of new examination centres 1(GP) 8
10 Training of invigilators 4(GP, WC, NC, NW) 5
11 Selection and appointment of markers 4(GP, WC, NC, NP) 5
12 Establishment of marking centres 3 (NC, NP, FS) 6
13 Capture of oral, practical and year marks 3(GP, WC, EC) 6
14 Security 4 (WC, NC, EC, NW) 5

Most of the provinces managed the majority of the key processes in the examination cycle well. Over the last three years there has been a progressive improvement in the administration of the Senior Certificate examinations.

However, two of the provinces (EC, NW) indicated that they experienced problems with the typing and editing of question papers. The lack of appointed editors in these provinces has contributed to this problem. Provinces experienced minor problems in the following areas:

The details of some of the problems experienced by the provincial education departments and the remedial measures adopted are listed below:

Northern Province
North West Province
Gauteng
Free State
KwaZulu-Natal
Eastern Cape
Northern Cape
Western Cape

The above problems are not major problems and will be attended to as part of the ongoing refinement and improvement of the examinations. The Inter-provincial Examinations Committee (IPEC) will convene early next year to discuss these problems and to put remedial measures in place. In the interim the provincial departments will be monitored by the national Department to ensure that these problems are given proper attention.


5. CONDUCT OF THE EXAMINATIONS

5.1. Examination Centres

Five of the provinces i.e. Free State, Northern Cape, Eastern Cape, North West and the Northern Province indicated that not all their institutions are fully equipped to conduct the examinations. Special mention was made of schools in the rural areas that lack proper facilities. In the Free State, it was indicated that in certain cases dilapidated buildings are used as examination venues.

However, provincial departments have authorised schools to use community facilities, e.g. community halls if the facilities at the schools are not appropriate. There was also the problem of ABET centres in the North West province that did not have adequate furniture.

Direct communication with examination centres is a problem in certain provinces, especially with those located in the rural areas where telecommunication facilities are inadequate. Provincial departments have overcome these communication problems through a network system established, via the regional, district and area offices.

5.2. Invigilation

In all the provinces, except the Western Cape, educators at school are responsible for invigilation as part of their teaching responsibilities. In the Western Cape, private invigilators are appointed to conduct the examinations at schools. In the other provinces private invigilators are appointed to assist with private candidates. In Gauteng, due to the poor standard of invigilation at some of the inner city independent schools, private invigilators are appointed.

5.3. Monitoring of the Examinations

All provinces have monitoring teams in place to monitor the writing of the examination and the marking process. These teams are operational at provincial, regional and district level. There are also monitoring teams from the national Department of Education and from the South African Certification Council (SAFCERT).

5.4. Irregularities encountered with the writing of the Examination

The problems encountered by most provinces were of a minor nature relating to shortages of question papers at certain centres, change of grades by candidates, errata to questions, etc. Most of these problems were of such a nature that they could be resolved at school level.

The serious problems included the following:

A comprehensive list of all the irregularities reported to the national Department of Education is as follows:

WESTERN CAPE

NORTHERN CAPE

FREE STATE

EASTERN CAPE

KWAZULU-NATAL

MPUMALANGA

NORTHERN PROVINCE

GAUTENG

NORTH WEST

All the irregularities will be handled by the Irregularities Committee established in each province for this purpose. The National Policy on the Conduct of the Senior Certificate examinations provides clear guidelines to provincial education departments on the handling of these irregularities.

It however needs to be noted that due to the swift response of the provincial officials, the above irregularities have not compromised the integrity of the examination as a whole.

5.5. Security at Regional Offices, District Offices and Examination Centres.

The security at the examination centres is poor and therefore all provinces except the Western Cape store question papers at Regional and District offices. Question papers are delivered to the examination centres on a daily basis. In the Western Cape schools have adequate strong room facilities for the storage of question papers are stored at schools. The Western Cape also delivers question papers to certain examination centres, where there are no strong room facilities, on the morning of the examination.

In the other provinces security at the regional and district offices have been improved by employing security guards on 24-hour duty. In some of the provinces the SAPS have inspected the security at these offices. Two of the provinces, i.e. Eastern Cape and North West province, have indicated that there is room for improvement in this area.

5.6. Return of Scripts

Except in the case of the Western Cape, scripts are returned to the district office or a storage point on a daily basis. From the district office or the storage point each province has its own programme for the collection of scripts. In the Western Cape scripts are collected from the schools at least three times per week.

6. MARKING PROCESS

Table 4 provides some information on the marking process in each of the nine provinces.

Table 4: Information on the marking process in each of the nine provinces
PROVINCE CENTRALISED/DECENTRALISED

NO. OF MARKING CENTRES

NO. OF MARKERS

Western Cape Centralized

1

1 900

Northern Cape Centralized

2

478

Eastern Cape Decentralized

5

4 300

KwaZulu Natal Decentralized

14

6 800

Free State Centralised

1

2 100

Gauteng Decentralised

3

12 000

North West Decentralised

10

2 153

Mpumalanga Decentralised

7

2 477

Northern Province Decentralised

13

6 304

TOTAL  

56

38 512

Gauteng uses the staggered marking approach, where marking commences immediately after the paper is written. Each marking centre is therefore used for four marking sessions. The duration of each marking session in Gauteng is reduced to an average of four days (compared to ten days in the other provinces) and therefore a larger number of markers are used in this province

6.1. Appointment of Markers

Prospective markers complete application forms which are verified by the school principal and the district office in certain provinces. A panel constituted in terms of the national policy on examinations then selects the markers. The criteria used for the selection of these markers are also prescribed in the national policy on examinations. Provision is made for novice markers and for representivity (i.e. gender and race).

6.2. Training of Markers

In all the provinces the Chief Markers trains the markers. This is normally done a day before the marking process begins. The training session includes a detailed discussion of the marking memorandum, a discussion of the application of the marking memorandum and other marking procedures.

6.3. Quality Control Measures

In order to ensure the quality of marking, a team of seven markers work under the supervision of a senior marker. Seven senior markers work under the supervision of a chief marker. If the number of senior markers exceeds seven, then Deputy Chief Markers are appointed to supervise the work of the Senior Markers. Senior markers, Deputy Chief Markers and Chief Markers must moderate 10% of the scripts of the markers they supervise. The internal moderator then moderates 10% of the scripts per question paper. In addition examination assistants are appointed to check each script to ensure that the entire script is marked and to check the addition of the marks.

7. CAPTURE AND PROCESSING OF MARKS

In all the provinces the marks are captured in-house, except in the case of the Eastern Cape where the oral and practical marks are captured in-house but the examination marks are out-sourced to a reputable data-capture company.

In all provinces the double capture method is used i.e. the marks are captured by the first Data Capturer and then re-captured by a second Data-Capturer. Any difference between the first and second capture is highlighted by the computer system. In some of the provinces e.g. Gauteng an audit of a sample of the scripts, mark sheets, and computer printouts is done.

8. STANDARDISATION PROCESS AND THE RELEASE OF RESULTS

All 9 provinces are confident about the provincial capacity to handle the processing and the standardisation of results.

The Council of Education Ministers has decided that the senior certificate results should be released between 28 December 1999 and 30 December 1999. This is a precautionary measure to avoid any Y2K related complications. No problems are anticipated with the early release of the results. However, contingency plans are in place to take care of unexpected problems that may occur. These contingency plans include:

Only three provinces are satisfied with the current SAFCERT standardisation process. Comments on the process are as follows:

The entire standardisation of the senior certificate examination will be a part of an investigation to be carried out by the Department of Education in 2000.

9. CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT/ YEAR MARK

Five of the nine provinces are currently implementing continuous assessment in some form or the other. These provinces include Western Cape, Gauteng, Northern Cape, Mpumalanga and the Eastern Cape. Table 5 below provides additional information on the implementation of the year mark in the above five provinces:

Table 5: Additional information on the implementation of the year mark in the above five provinces
PROV. SUBJECTS

WEIGHTING

MODERATION MECHANISM
WC

All

25 - 33%

Face moderation by subject advisors and statistically moderated by SAFCERT
GP

All

40%

Moderation of year mark exams by district officials and statistically moderated by SAFCERT
NC

All

25 - 33%

Face moderation, 10% of portfolios are moderated and statistical moderation by SAFCERT
MP

Biology

25%

10% of schools are moderated and thereafter all mark-sheets are moderated. Also subjected to SAFCERT statistical moderation.
EC

History

20- 25%

Face moderation and statistical moderation by SAFCERT

In the case of the Western Cape the year mark could be higher in practical subjects e.g. Art (50%); Technical subjects (42%) and Music (50%). The oral component in the languages constitutes 33% of the final mark.

Three of the provinces have indicated that they intend implementing the year mark in 2000. These provinces are NorthWest, Northern Province and KwaZulu-Natal. These provinces have already drafted plans and are on schedule to implement continuous assessment in the year 2000. KwaZulu Natal has run pilot projects as part of their planning for the implementation of the year mark in 2000. Only one province viz. Free State does not have any strategy in place to implement continuous assessment in the year 2000.

Problems experienced by the provincial education departments in the implementation of the year mark include:

The national Department of Education is in the process of drafting a national guideline document which will provide a clear framework for the implementation of continuous assessment in Grade 12. This document will ensure uniformity in the implementation of continuous assessment across the nine provincial education departments. The document has been presented to the Inter-provincial Examinations Committee (IPEC) for their comment and thereafter it will be submitted to HEDCOM for approval and to be implemented in the year 2000.

10. SUPPLEMENTARY EXAMINATIONS

Current practice in South Africa is to hold supplementary examinations early in the year following the final examination in October/November of the previous year. Supplementary examinations are conducted to give a second opportunity to learners who lack one or two requirements to obtain a senior certificate pass or a senior certificate with endorsement. Statistics for the 1999 supplementary examination are summarised in table 6 below:

Table 6: Statistics relating to the 1999 supplementary examination
PROVINCE

REGISTERED FOR THE EXAM

WROTE THE EXAM

PERCENTAGE WROTE

N. Province

15 031

12 842

85

Mpumalanga

6 504

4 958

76

North West

3 687

2 985

81

Gauteng

6 948

5 391

78

Free State

7 703

5 055

66

KwaZulu Natal

7 200

7 200

100

Eastern Cape

18 853

13 148

70

N. Cape

945

822

87

W Cape

4894

3227

66

TOTAL

71 765

55 628

78

All nine provinces have already commenced with preparations for the 2000 supplementary examinations. The following forms part of their plans:

10.1. Future of supplementary examinations

Seven out of nine provinces feel that the supplementary examinations should be phased out. The reasons cited are as follows:

Only the Western Cape and Free State feel that it should not be phased out. The problem with the supplementary examination being scrapped would be that candidates who qualify for the supplementary examination due to valid reasons would be disadvantaged.

11. COST OF EXAMINATIONS

Allocated budget for the Senior Certificate examinations

Examinations are fully funded by provincial education departments of education. The budget allocations per province are listed in table 7 below:

Table 7: Budget allocations per province for Senior Certificate examinations
PROVINCE

BUDGET

Northern Province

64 359 743

Mpumalanga

23 175 000

North West

23 698 000

Gauteng

32 000 000

Free State

15 000 000

KwaZulu Natal

73 000 000

Eastern Cape

46 789 000

Northern Cape

8 982 000

Western Cape

16 000 000

TOTAL

303 003 743

The examination budget of the nine provincial education departments varies from 8 million in the Northern Cape to 73 million in KwaZulu-Natal. The total budget for all nine provincial education departments amounts to R303 million. Mpumalanga, KwaZulu-Natal and the Northern Cape have indicated that their current budget is adequate. The other 6 provinces have indicated that their budgets are inadequate. Problems relating to the budget include:

There is general consensus among the provinces that an examination fee should be instituted to offset the high examination costs. This matter will receive full consideration by the Council of Education Ministers early in the year 2000.

12. EVALUATION OF THE EXAMINATION SYSYEM

Review of the Senior Certificate Examinations by the Cambridge International Examinations

As part of the Ministry's ongoing review of the Senior Certificate Examinations, the Minister of Education, Professor Kader Asmal, requested the Cambridge International Examinations to conduct an international review and benchmarking of all procedures relating to the conduct of the South African Senior Certificate Examinations.

The following is a summary of the findings of this review:

The recommendations of the review by the Cambridge International Examinations were discussed extensively at the meeting of the Heads of Education Departments (HEDCOM) and this will be further discussed at the meeting of the Council of Education Ministers (CEM) early in the new year. Emanating from these discussions a clear plan of action will be put in place to implement the important recommendations.

As a follow up to this review the Council of Education Ministers (CEM) has already approved the international benchmarking of the standards of the Senior Certificate examinations. As a first step the Senior Certificate will be benchmarked with the Scottish Higher Examination Authorities and this process is scheduled to commence in the year 2000.

13. CONCLUSION

The provincial education departments administered the first Senior Certificate examination in 1996. In this examination the disparate practices and procedures of the ex-departments had to be amalgamated and the exercise was fraught with serious problems. However, over the last four years, through the intervention of the national Department of Education and the closer collaboration between provincial education departments, a remarkable improvement in the examination process has resulted. The focused approach to the administration of the examinations and the exceptional commitment of all officials have contributed to this improvement.

Despite the fact that certain areas are still in need of refinement, the examination system in the country is currently of a high standard. The following are some of the areas that are in need of refinement or change:


Contents   |    Next