STATEMENT BY MS SANKIE MTHEMBI-NKONDO, ACTING MINISTER FOR THE PUBLIC SERVICE AND ADMINISTRATION ON AN AGREEMENT REACHED WITHIN THE CENTRAL CHAMBER OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE BARGAINING COUNCIL ON IMPROVEMENTS IN CONDITIONS OF SERVICE FOR THE CURRENT FINANCIAL YEAR
Issued by: Ministry for Public Service and Administration
25 May 1995
It is with great pleasure that I announce that after 10 months of negotiations in the Central Chamber an agreement was finally reached on 23 May 1995 on improvements in conditions of service for the current financial year. In short the contents of the agreement entails the following:
The above-mentioned improvement plan is linked to a three year plan. The State commits itself to the provision of sufficient funds for negotiation of phases 2 and 3 of the three year plan. This is to be dealt with within the framework of the investigations of the Task Teams, established pursuant to a meeting with the Deputy Presidents, the Minister for the Public Service and Administration and the presidents of the employee organisations admitted to the Central Chamber of the Public Service Bargaining Council.
The improvements are partially to be funded by reducing the State's contribution ratio to the Government Pension Funds by a factor determined by an actuary to generate the additional funds. The various media reports over the last few weeks in this regard might have created a wrong impression in regard to the factual situation. I would therefore like to put the matter into perspective.
The Government of National Unity (GNU) initially, within severe economic constraints, made an amount of R2 500 million available to be utilised for improvements in conditions of service during the current financial year in both the Public Service and Educator sectors.
Through a process of negotiation with the employee organisations admitted to the Central Chamber of the Public Service Bargaining Council it became clear to the GNU that the amount initially allocated was not sufficient if the most urgent needs were to be addressed.
In an effort to conclude an agreement with the employee organisations the GNU investigated the means through which additional funds could be made available. Within the already mentioned economic constraints the only workable option was to propose a reduction in the State's contribution to the pension funds for the current financial year.
This offer should be viewed against the following background:
These guarantees form part and parcel of the agreement that was reached in the Central Chamber. Even the employee organisations in the Central Chamber of the Public Service Bargaining Council who are not party to the agreement accepted the employer's offer that the improvements should be partially funded by reducing the State's contribution to the pension funds.
I would like to emphasise that, taking into consideration the guarantees being given. Public Servants need not have any fears in regard to the utilisation of the State's contribution to the pension funds for purposes of improving conditions of service in the current financial year. This must be seen as a serious effort on the part of the GNU to accommodate the needs of Public Servants.
To summarise, this agreement must be seen as a confirmation of the commitment of the GNU and the Chamber to the objectives of the RDP. The plight of the lower paid workers was again the focus point and will continue to receive priority attention as part of a three year plan, whilst the needs of higher paid personnel will also be attended to.