https://www.polity.org.za
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Case Law / High Courts RSS ← Back
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Embed Video

Spar Group Limited v Synergy Income Fund Limited and Others (8021/2014) [2014] ZAKZDHC 49

Spar Group Limited v Synergy Income Fund Limited and Others (8021/2014) [2014] ZAKZDHC 49

6th November 2014

SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

  • Spar Group Limited v Synergy Income Fund Limited and Others (8021/2014) [2014] ZAKZDHC 49
    Download
    0.45 MB
Sponsored by

[1] By notice of motion dated 8 July 2014 the applicant, the Spar Group Limited, launched an application for the grant of a rule nisi (with interim relief) calling upon the respondents to show cause why an order should not be made protecting what the applicant contends to be its sole trading rights in the shopping centre known as King Senzangakhona Shopping Centre at Ulundi. The first respondent is the applicant’s current landlord, Synergy Income Fund Limited. The second, third and fourth respondents are related entities which fall under the control of Massmart Holdings (Pty) Ltd.


[2] The applicant is a wholesaler and distributor which, as its name suggests, is the supplier to Spar supermarkets, and which runs the Spar organisation. The second, third and fourth respondents feature in this application representing the interests of the retail outlets known as Game and the supermarkets known as Cambridge Food.

Advertisement

[3] For the sake of convenience I will refer in this judgment to the second, third and fourth respondents as “Massmart”.


[4] In May 2008 the applicant concluded a lease in respect of large premises in the shopping centre. The lease was concluded with Khuthala Alliance (Pty) Ltd (“Khuthala”), then the owner of the property. In terms of the lease the applicant had the right to sub-let the premises to a retail member of the Spar Guild of Southern Africa. The intention was that the applicant would hold the head lease over the premises and sublet them to a retailer who would conduct the business of a Spar Supermarket. The agreement of lease provided that the landlord would not during the period of the lease or any renewal thereof lease any portion of the shopping centre (or any extension of it) to a tenant whose business comprised, in whole or in part, a bakery, a butchery, a superette, supermarket, greengrocer, trading store, hypermarket, wholesaler, cash and carry or other like business, department store with a food department (other than Jet Mart), a liquor store (other than a Tops liquor outlet) or a delicatessan. The applicant sublet the premises to a Spar retailer which opened its business and traded.

Advertisement

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options
Free daily email newsletter Register Now