https://www.polity.org.za
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / News / All News RSS ← Back
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Article Enquiry

Public Protector praises court for giving it jurisdiction over government medical scheme

Close

Embed Video

Public Protector praises court for giving it jurisdiction over government medical scheme

Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane
Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane

2nd July 2019

By: News24Wire

SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

The Public Protector has praised a high court ruling confirming her office has jurisdiction over the GEMS medical aid scheme exclusive to government employees.

Spokesperson Oupa Segalwe, said in a statement on Monday: "The ruling paves the way for advocate [Busisiwe] Mkhwebane to carry on with an investigation that deadlocked for nearly two years, leaving the complainant in the matter in the lurch.

Advertisement

"This was as a result of GEMS' earlier contention that it was neither an organ of state nor a government component and thus did not fall within the remit of the Public Protector," Segalwe explained.

Mkhwebane and the medical aid scheme faced off in court following a complaint by a dependent of a GEMS member alleging it had refused to admit him as the beneficiary after the member's death.

Advertisement

The person died on June 27, 2013 and was a GEMS member with full benefits, including a subsidy.

The deceased and the dependent were on the medical aid scheme from June 1, 2013.

"GEMS terminated the complainant's membership soon thereafter," Segalwe added.

The Public Protector's investigation on the matter stalled from June 2017 to June 2018 after the medical aid scheme raised questions on jurisdiction.

This was followed by Mkhwebane issuing subpoenas to GEMS' principal officer, Gunvant Goolab, and legal adviser Johannes Kruger to appear before her.

"It was at that point that GEMS turned to the court for a declaratory order with regard to the jurisdiction of the Public Protector to investigate and entertain the complaint in question, together with ancillary relief to set aside any steps by the Public Protector in pursuit of the complaint, including the subpoenas served on Goolab and Kruger," Segalwe said.

Mkhwebane argued that although the medical aid scheme was not an organ of state, it fell in her jurisdiction because it performed a public function and was established by the government for a government purpose.

The High Court in Pretoria ruled that the case, which is in the interest of the public, should be investigated further to determine whether the complainant was unlawfully excluded from the scheme and if this amounted to improper prejudice on the said complainant.

GEMS' application was subsequently dismissed with costs.

Mkhwebane said she was now expecting Goolab and Kruger to appear before her and provide her with all the information required to bring this case to a close.

"It is a pity that the complainant, who does not have the means to go to court to hold GEMS to account, has had to endure these delays to know whether or not he is entitled to the medical aid benefits he deserves," Mkhwebane concluded.

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options
Free daily email newsletter Register Now