Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Case Law / Supreme Court of Appeal RSS ← Back

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by


Embed Video

Gamede and Another v S (161/2010) [2010] ZASCA 122

30th September 2010


Font size: -+

Sponsored by

The SCA today dismissed an appeal against a conviction of dealing in 556 kgs of mandrax in the case of each of the appellants the value of the mandrax was approximately R50 million.

The appeal against their respective sentences of 20 years' imprisonment was upheld on the basis that the role played by each of them was not substantial and neither of them had been proved to have been the mastermind behind the operation of a mandrax manufacturing plant conducted on Spitskop and Mange Farms in KwaZulu-Natal.


The first appellant was apprehended by police as she was in the process of removing incrimination evidence.

The SCA found that the large scale of the manufacturing operation complied with her conduct in attempting to evade arrest, was consistent with knowledge on her part that she was involved in an illegal operation and that she was aware of the nature of the material she was conveying. The court however found that such knowledge and conduct did not warrant a sentence of 20 years' imprisonment but one more in line with sentences imposed on persons convicted after the fact. Her sentence was accordingly altered to one of five years' imprisonment.


The first appellant was apprehended on Spitskop Farm in possession of a bag of Anthranilic Acid, established on the evidence as being a substance used in the manufacture of mandrax. He was seen prior to his arrest on at least four different occasions on the farm, in the company of workers wearing gas masks, gum boots and gloves. From this evidence the court concluded that he was knowingly bringing the acid to the farm so that the drugs could be manufactured. Because he was directly involved in the manufacturing process the SCA considered, despite his clean record, that his role justified the imposition of no more than a sentence of 15 years' imprisonment for a conviction of drug dealing, as provided for in the Criminal Law Amendment Act 105 of 1997, as amended. The first appellant's sentence was accordingly altered to one of 15 years' imprisonment.



To subscribe email or click here
To advertise email or click here

Comment Guidelines

About is a product of Creamer Media.

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more


We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store


Advertising on is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email

View options
Free daily email newsletter Register Now